"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union v Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd [2026] FWC 1160
1
Fair Work Act 2009
s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries
Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union
v
Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd
(B2026/347)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 7 APRIL 2026
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd –AEC ballot
[1] This is an application by the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and
Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU
or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot
order in relation to certain employees of Saputo Dairy Australia Pty Ltd (Saputo Dairy or
Employer).
[2] I note that the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal,
Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU)1 have made a separate application
for a protected action ballot order in relation to the same proposed agreement.
[3] On 2 April 2026, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not
object to the Application. I note the Employer initially raised an objection in relation to some
of the details of the declaration accompanying the application but did not wish for the AMWU
to address these points. I also observe the AMWU clarified the proposed agreement and
amended the application to account for inconsistencies raised by the Commission.
[4] In the circumstances, I have amended the application and decided to determine the
matter on the papers without holding a hearing.
[5] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Michael Wickham,
State Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the AMWU in bargaining with the Employer and
that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Saputo Dairy, I am satisfied
that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the
requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
[6] The ballot is to be conducted by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC). I have
amended the Order to reflect the Commission standard wording that is consistent for an AEC
Order. This includes that the detail directions normally issued in the case of a non-AEC ballot
[2026] FWC 1160
DECISION
-- 1 of 2 --
[2026] FWC 1160
2
agent are not required in the case of the AEC given the terms of the Act and the nature of that
entity.
[7] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date
by which voting is to close is 19 May 2026.2 This also establishes the ballot period for the
purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
[8] An Order has been separately issued in PR798343.
[9] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the
s.448A compulsory conciliation conference along with the other related matter if an order is
ultimately made arising from that application. That Member will issue an Order requiring the
attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the
conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the
conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR798342>
1 B2026/348. This application is presently contested.
2 This is, in effect, 30 working days from the making of the Order and is the minimum ballot period required by the AEC.
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc1160.pdf