Ali Jaser v Marist 180 [2026] FWC 1907

1 Fair Work Act 2009 s.394—Unfair dismissal Ali Jaser v Marist 180 (U2025/16932) DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON SYDNEY, 25 MAY 2026 Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – application fee not paid or waived – application not made in accordance with the Act - application dismissed. [1] On 21 October 2025, Mr Ali Jaser made an unfair dismissal application to the Fair Work Commission under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). [2] Mr Jaser’s application was not made in accordance with the Act (per s.587(1)(a)) because the prescribed fee (per s.395) has not been paid or waived. [3] Commission staff attempted to contact Mr Jaser on 28 October, 31 October and 15 December 2025 by SMS and email. [4] Section 587 confers a discretion on the Commission to dismiss Mr Jaser’s application if it has not been made in accordance with the Act. Mr Jaser has had ample opportunity to rectify the deficiency in his application and has had ample opportunity to show why his application should not be dismissed under s.587 (see generally Bond v Carbridge Pty Ltd T/A Carbridge [2024] FWC 1302 at [15]-[16] and the cases cited therein). [5] I make the following order: A. The application under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) made by Mr Ali Jaser on 21 October 2026 is dismissed. [2026] FWC 1907 DECISION AND ORDER -- 1 of 2 -- [2026] FWC 1907 2 DEPUTY PRESIDENT Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer <PR810356> -- 2 of 2 --