Acacia Avenue Preschool Association Inc & Ors (As Represented By Early Learning Association Australia Inc. T/A Early Learning Association Australia) v Australian Education Union (Victorian Branch) and the United Workers Union [2024] FWC 1447
1
Fair Work Act 2009
s.248 -Application for a single interest employer authorisation
Acacia Avenue Preschool Association Inc & Ors (As Represented By Early
Learning Association Australia Inc. T/A Early Learning Association
Australia)
v
Australian Education Union (Victorian Branch) and the United Workers
Union
(B2024/235)
COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL MELBOURNE, 3 JUNE 2024
Single interest employer authorisation regarding proposed Victorian Early Childhood
Teachers and Educators Agreement (VECTEA 2024).
[1] This matter concerns an application by Acacia Avenue Preschool Association Inc &
Ors under s.248 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) for a single interest employer
authorisation to cover the 387 employers (the Applicant Employers). The Authorisation is
sought in respect of bargaining for the proposed enterprise agreement being the Victorian
Early Childhood Teachers and Educators Agreement (VECTEA 2024).
[2] The employees to be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement are:
a. Early childhood teachers,
b. Early childhood educators (certificate III qualified and diploma qualified),
employed to support the delivery of kindergarten education programs, including
those employed as an additional assistant or activity group leader,
c. Early childhood advisors, early childhood advisors in charge and preschool field
officers, and
d. Nominated supervisors and educational leaders.
[3] The Early Learning Association Australia Inc. T/A Early Learning Association
Australia (ELAA) is nominated by the Applicant Employers to make applications under the
Act in connection with this authorisation. I am satisfied the Application has been validly
made.
[4] The application is made by the Applicant Employers who seek to bargain together.
Accordingly, the additional requirements of s.249(1A) of the Act apply, and the terms of
s.249(1B) of the Act and consequential provisions do not. Therefore, the constraints operating
under s.249(1D) of the Act do not apply.
[2024] FWC 1447
DECISION
-- 1 of 3 --
[2024] FWC 1447
2
[5] The respondents to the application are the Australian Education Union (AEU)
Victorian Branch and the United Workers Union (UWU). At least some of the employees who
would be covered by the proposed agreement are represented by either the AEU or the UWU.
I am satisfied that the AEU and UWU as the bargaining representatives were provided with an
opportunity to express their views on the proposed authorisation. The AEU and UWU have
provided submissions confirming they support the Authorisation being made.
[6] The ELAA filed submissions on behalf of the Applicant Employers. The Applicant
Employers were provided with an opportunity to express any further views other than those
contained in the application. No views were submitted beyond those already contained in the
application.
[7] Each of the Applicant Employers that will be covered by the proposed agreement have
agreed to bargain together. Each of the Applicant Employers signed an Employer Bargaining
Representative Authorisation form in which they consented to appoint the ELAA as a
bargaining representative under s.176(1)(d) of the Act, in relation to the negotiation and
making of a single interest employer agreement made under s.249 of the Act. I am satisfied
that no person has been coerced, or threatened to coerce, any of the employers to agree to
bargain for a single-interest enterprise agreement.
[8] I am satisfied that the Applicant Employers have clearly identifiable common
interests. All the employers have sites in Victoria which is relevant in the context of funding
and operational implications as well as there being a common regulatory framework that
applies. The parties in this matter have a long history of bargaining together and have been
party to multiple-business certified agreements (enterprise agreements) under the Workplace
Relations Act 1996 (Cth) or single-interest agreements under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
[9] The Applicant Employers have shared common interests, and it is submitted that
continuing to provide consistent terms and conditions of employment across the Applicant
Employers is likely to result in more stable recruitment and retention in an industry where
there is a scarcity of appropriately qualified early childhood teachers to deliver kindergarten
education programs and early childhood educations. I am satisfied that it would not be
contrary to the public interest to make the authorisation.
[10] The Applicant Employers have comparable operations and business activities. They
are each required to comply with the state-based regulatory requirements as part of the
Victorian education system for kindergarten education. The Applicant Employers provide
services of the same kind and engage employees to perform the same duties. Therefore, many
of the Applicant Employers operate collaboratively sharing resources and funding activities
across centres.
[11] The agreement will not cover those employees in relation to general building and
construction work. Therefore, the Authorisation meets the requirement of s.249A of the Act.
-- 2 of 3 --
[2024] FWC 1447
3
Conclusions
[12] I am satisfied that all the relevant requirements under s.249(1) of the Act have been
met. I am therefore obliged to issue the authorisation sought.
[13] The Authorisation to be issued separately in PR775629 satisfies the requirements of
s.250 of the Act.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR775630>
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2024fwc1447.pdf