R v DAVID ROSS CROUCH [2024] SASC 57
Applicant: R Counsel: MS T NELSON - Solicitor: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (SA)
Respondent: DAVID ROSS CROUCH Counsel: MR M LOVE - Solicitor: LEGAL SERVICES
COMMISSION (SA)
Hearing Date/s: 17/08/2023, 26/03/2024
File No/s: SCCRM-22-328
B
SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
(Criminal: Application)
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply
to this judgment. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach
any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court in which it was generated.
R v CROUCH
[2024] SASC 57
Judgment of the Honourable Justice Stein
19 April 2024
CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCE - SENTENCING ORDERS - ORDERS AND
DECLARATIONS RELATING TO SERIOUS OR VIOLENT OFFENDERS OR
DANGEROUS SEXUAL OFFENDERS
CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCE - POST-CUSTODIAL ORDERS - OTHER TYPES
OF POST-CUSTODIAL ORDERS
The respondent pleaded guilty to aggravated possess child exploitation material and possess child
exploitation material contrary to s 63A(1) of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA).
The applicant seeks an indefinite detention order pursuant to s 57 of the Sentencing Act 2017 (SA).
The applicant submits that it is appropriate to make an order for indefinite detention in circumstances
where the Court can be satisfied the respondent is incapable or unwilling to control his sexual
instincts, where he poses a significant risk to the safety of the community, and where the risk will
not be substantially ameliorated by any alternative order.
The respondent accepted that his prior offending enlivened s 57 of the Sentencing Act 2017 (SA) and
that the court could be satisfied that the respondent is unwilling to control, his sexual instincts. The
respondent submitted however that the Court should not exercise the discretion as the protection of
the community is not required primarily because there has been no escalation in offending and no
contact offending since 2006.
Held:
1. It is appropriate, in all the circumstances, to grant the application for an indefinite detention
order under s 57 of the Sentencing Act 2017 (SA).
Sentencing Act 2017 (SA) s 57; Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) s 63A, referred to.
-- 1 of 29 --
-- 2 of 29 --
R v CROUCH
[2024] SASC 57
Criminal: Application
1 STEIN J: The Director of Public Prosecutions (“the Director”) has applied for
an order that David Ross Crouch be detained in custody until further order pursuant
to s 57(7) of the Sentencing Act 2017 (SA) (“the Act”).
2 The Director submitted that there is a cogent evidentiary basis to support the
conclusion that Mr Crouch is unwilling to control his sexual instincts.
The Director contended the Court should exercise the discretion to detain
Mr Crouch in custody until further order on the grounds that, if given the
opportunity, there is a significant risk that Mr Crouch will not only engage in child
exploitation material but again commit contact sexual offending.
3 Mr Crouch relied on a number of matters in opposing the application,
including that he has not committed contact offending since 2006 and that there
has been no escalation of his offending.
4 I have considered carefully all of the material before me. I have accepted the
opinions of the psychiatrists that Mr Crouch is unwilling to control his sexual
instincts. For the reasons I explain below, I have determined to exercise the
discretion to make an order detaining Mr Crouch in custody until further order.
Chronology of offending, sentences imposed and treatment programs
5 Mr Crouch’s history of relevant sexual offending and his engagement in
treatment programs is relevant. I set out a summary below.
6 Between 1 January 1989 and 27 April 1991, Mr Crouch committed the
offence of unlawful sexual intercourse with a person under 12 years. The victim
was Mr Crouch ’s stepson, aged about six years at the time. The offending
involved performing oral sex on the victim.
7 Between 1 September 1996 and 1 September 1997, Mr Crouch committed
the offence of unlawful sexual intercourse with a person under 12 years.
The victim was Mr Crouch’s stepson, who was then aged 11 or 12 years old.
The offending involved performing oral sex on the victim and the victim
performing oral sex on Mr Crouch. This offending occurred after Mr Crouch’s
stepson returned to reside with Mr Crouch and his then wife after an interval living
elsewhere.
8 On 28 March 2002, Mr Crouch was sentenced for the two counts of unlawful
sexual intercourse and received a term of imprisonment of three years and nine
months to commence from 28 March 2002. On 27 September 2004, Mr Crouch
was released on parole.
-- 3 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
2
9 On 18 November 2004, Mr Crouch commenced attending the Sex Offender
Treatment and Assessment Program and attended 43 out of 55 weekly treatment
sessions.
10 Mr Crouch’s period of parole in respect of the imprisonment for the counts
of unlawful sexual intercourse expired on 27 December 2005.
11 Between March 2006 and 14 May 2006, Mr Crouch committed the offence
of unlawful sexual intercourse with a person over the age of 12 and under the age
of 17. The victim was aged 14 years. Mr Crouch had known the child since she
was 18 months old. On 27 August 2006, Mr Crouch committed the offence of
unlawful sexual intercourse with a person over the age of 14 and under the age of
17. The victim was the same victim of the March to May 2006 offending.
The offending included penile/vaginal sexual intercourse. Mr Crouch also filmed
the victim in the bath.
12 Between 20 November 2006 and 21 December 2006, Mr Crouch breached
his conditions of bail by contacting the victim of his offending contrary to the terms
of his bail agreement.
13 On 16 August 2007, Mr Crouch was sentenced in relation to the 2006
offending. Mr Crouch received a term of imprisonment of five years and four
months.
14 In 2009 while in custody, Mr Crouch took part in the Sexual Behaviour Clinic
program (“SBC”). Mr Crouch was assessed both before and after treatment
through the Sexual Behaviour Clinic. The post-treatment assessment estimated
Mr Crouch’s overall risk of sexual re-offending as falling within the high range.
15 Mr Crouch’s parole period expired, and he was released on 21 April 2012.
16 Between 23 July 2014 and 13 March 2015, Mr Crouch committed the offence
of using a listening device to monitor private conversations. Mr Crouch was
witnessed filming children in an adjacent yard without permission.
17 On 13 March 2015, Mr Crouch committed the offence of possessing child
pornography contrary to s 63A of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA).
18 On 19 August 2016, Mr Crouch was sentenced by the Magistrates Court for
the offending which occurred between July 2014 and 13 March 2015. Mr Crouch
was sentenced to a period of imprisonment of four years and 10 months to
commence from 13 May 2015.
19 In 2019, Mr Crouch engaged in, and completed, the Sexual Behaviour Clinic
program.
20 In a report dated 16 November 2019, Dr Raeside assessed Mr Crouch as
being at ongoing significant risk of further sexual re-offending.
-- 4 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
3
21 On 26 February 2020, the Supreme Court made orders imposing on Mr
Crouch an extended supervision order (“ESO”) for three years.
22 On 12 May 2020, Mr Crouch was released from custody.
23 On 28 October 2021, Mr Crouch was interviewed by the Parole Board of
South Australia in relation to two breaches of the no drugs condition of the ESO
and received a warning from the Parole Board.
24 On 16 March 2022, Mr Crouch committed the offence of aggravated
possessing child exploitation material and possessing child exploitation contrary
to s 63A(1) of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA). Mr Crouch was
alleged to have breached his ANCOR obligations by following a 15 year old
female on Instagram. The discovery of the Instagram contact resulted in the police
searching Mr Crouch’s residence and finding the child exploitation material. The
charge referable to the Instagram contact was later withdrawn.
25 Mr Crouch pleaded guilty to the charges of aggravated possession and
possession of child exploitation material.
26 On the prosecution’s application, Mr Crouch was remanded by the District
Court to be dealt with by the Supreme Court pursuant to s 57 of the Sentencing
Act.
27 For the charges of aggravated possession and possession of child exploitation
material I sentenced Mr Crouch to imprisonment for a period of five years, reduced
to three years and nine months on account of his guilty plea, with a non-parole
period of three years. I determined the commencement date for both the head
sentence and non-parole period was 16 March 2022.
Relevant background to the charges of aggravated possession and possession
of child exploitation material
28 On 16 March 2022, police searched Mr Crouch’s residence and identified a
large number of files of both aggravated and basic child exploitation material
located across seven electronic devices being a hard disk drive, four USBs, three
memory cards and a telephone. A total of 4,635 files of aggravated child
exploitation materials and 7,979 files of child exploitation material were located.
29 The files were subsequently categorised as falling between aggravated
category 1 to aggravated category 5 and basic categories 1 to 6.
30 The majority of the files fell within the Child Exploitation Tracking Scheme
category 1 with a significant number in categories 2, 3 and 4 and some in category
5 and 6. There were 890 files of aggravated category 4 material and 1,278 files of
category 4 material and 15 files of aggravated category 5 material and 277 files of
category 5 material.
-- 5 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
4
31 The Child Exploitation Tracking Scheme Category 1 refers to images of
children likely to cause offence to a reasonable adult but where there is no actual
sexual activity occurring. Category 2 refers to material showing sexual acts
between children only including non-penetrative sexual activity between children
or solo masturbation by a child. Category 3 refers to material which features adults
with a child in any non-penetrative sexual activity. Category 4 refers to material
which shows penetrative sexual activity between children or between a child and
an adult. Category 5 contains images of children likely to cause offence to a
reasonable person where a child is subjected to sadism, torture, bestiality, or
humiliation. Category 6 refers to visual or audio representations of child
pornography in an image which does not appear to be a genuine photograph or
feature a real child.
32 Any depiction which shows a child who appears to be under 14 years of age
is an aggravated category.
33 The investigating officer who reviewed the electronic devices said the images
and videos he viewed during the review were of the worst kind he has viewed in
his experience. Images included penetrative penis-vagina sex between adults and
infant children. He identified 149 videos and 741 pictures depicting penetrative
sexual activity between adults and children under the age of 14 and most of the
images were of children with an estimated age of between four and 10 years old.
34 A number of other documents were also located. Mr Crouch had possession
of digital copies of court transcripts containing graphic evidence given by children
of their own experiences of sexual abuse.
35 The investigator also located a digital eBook entitled “How to practice child
love”, which was described as a 170 page publication depicting detailed step-by-
step instructions to paedophiles interested in locating and grooming children for
sexual activity. The eBook contained numerous written examples and descriptions
of sexual activity between adults and children. The investigator described the book
as “a horrendous piece of material” that encourages and enables paedophiles to
transition from viewing child exploitation material to engaging in contact sexual
offending against real child victims.
36 The digital book was last accessed on 6 October 2021 and the court
transcripts were last accessed on 13 January 2022, about three months prior to
Mr Crouch’s arrest.
37 Mr Crouch also had 34 images of the victim of Mr Crouch’s offending for
which he was sentenced in 2007. Six images depicted the genitals of the victim
and Mr Crouch positioned next to each other. Metadata indicated the images were
last accessed in October 2021, about six months prior to Mr Crouch’s arrest.
-- 6 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
5
Applicable legal principles
38 Section 57 of the Act relevantly provides as follows:
57—Offenders incapable of controlling, or unwilling to control, sexual instincts
(1) In this section—
…
person to whom this section applies means—
(a) a person convicted by the Supreme Court of a relevant offence; or
(b) a person remanded by the District Court or the Magistrates Court under
subsection (2) to be dealt with by the Supreme Court under this section; or
(c) a person who is the subject of an application by the Attorney General under
subsection (3);
relevant offence means—
(a) an offence under section 48, 48A, 49, 50, 56, 58, 59, 63, 63A, 63B, 69 or 72
of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935; or
(b) an offence under section 23 of the Summary Offences Act 1953; or
(c) an offence under a corresponding previous enactment substantially similar to
an offence referred to in either of the preceding paragraphs; or
(d) any other offence where the evidence indicates that the defendant may be
incapable of controlling, or unwilling to control, the defendant's sexual
instincts; or
(e) an offence of failing to comply with a reporting obligation relating to
reportable contact with a child without a reasonable excuse where the
defendant is a registrable offender within the meaning of the Child Sex
Offenders Registration Act 2006;
unwilling—a person to whom this section applies will be regarded as unwilling to
control sexual instincts if there is a significant risk that the person would, given an
opportunity to commit a relevant offence, fail to exercise appropriate control of the
person's sexual instincts.
(2) If, in proceedings before the District Court or Magistrates Court, a person is
convicted of a relevant offence and—
(a) the court is of the opinion that the defendant should be dealt with under this
section; or
(b) the prosecutor applies to have the defendant dealt with under this section,
the court will, instead of sentencing the defendant itself, remand the convicted
person, in custody or on bail, to appear before the Supreme Court to be dealt with
under this section.
-- 7 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
6
(3) …
(4) …
(5) …
(6) The Supreme Court must, before determining whether to make an order that a person
to whom this section applies be detained in custody until further order, direct that at
least 2 legally qualified medical practitioners (to be nominated by a prescribed
authority for the purpose) inquire into the mental condition of a person to whom this
section applies and report to the Court on whether the person is incapable of
controlling, or unwilling to control, the person's sexual instincts.
(7) The Supreme Court may order that a person to whom this section applies be detained
in custody until further order if satisfied that the order is appropriate.
(8) The paramount consideration of the Supreme Court in determining whether to make
an order that a person to whom this section applies be detained in custody until
further order must be to protect the safety of the community (whether as individuals
or in general).
(9) The Supreme Court must also take the following matters into consideration in
determining whether to make an order that a person to whom this section applies be
detained in custody until further order:
(a) the reports of the medical practitioners (as directed and nominated under
subsection (6)) provided to the Court;
(b) any relevant evidence or representations that the person may desire to put to
the Court;
(c) any report required by the Court under section 61;
(d) any other matter that the Court thinks relevant.
(10) A copy of a report provided to the Supreme Court under subsection (9) must be given
to each party to the proceedings or to counsel for those parties.
(11) …
(12) If a person to whom this section applies has not been sentenced for a relevant offence,
the Supreme Court will deal with the question of sentence at the same time as it deals
with the question whether an order is to be made under this section and, if the Court
decides to make such an order, the order may be made in addition to, or instead of,
a sentence of imprisonment.
(13) If the detention is in addition to a sentence of imprisonment, the detention will
commence on the expiration of the term of imprisonment, or of all terms of
imprisonment, that the person is liable to serve.
…
39 Mr Crouch accepts that the definition of “relevant offence” includes the
offences of aggravated and basic possession of child exploitation material and
accordingly applies to him.
-- 8 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
7
40 The definition of a person being “unwilling” to control his or her sexual
instincts differs from the ordinary meaning of the word “unwilling”. The question
of whether a person is unwilling to, or incapable of, controlling their sexual
instincts is a threshold question which must be answered “yes” or “no”.1 Before
making an order for indefinite detention, the Court is required to be satisfied a
person is either incapable of controlling or unwilling to control their sexual
instincts.2 If the threshold question is answered “yes”, there is a foundation for
making an order for indefinite detention.
41 However, a residual discretion remains. Even if the person is incapable of
controlling, or unwilling to control, their sexual instincts, there may nevertheless
be circumstances in which it is inappropriate for an indefinite detention order to
be made.3
42 The making of an order which is based on what it is apprehended a person
might do, as opposed to what a person has done, is an exceptional step with grave
consequences for personal liberty. A cogent evidentiary foundation must therefore
be established.4
43 In R v Hoare,5 Hinton J referred to observations of Bleby J in R v England6
(in relation to a provision which was the precursor to s 57(7)) as follows:
... satisfaction as to the inability of a person to control their sexual instincts is a matter of
assessing the opinions to that effect, their strengths and their weaknesses, to a point where
the court can be satisfied that the incapacity is present. In doing so, the court will need to
take account of the seriousness of the declaration it is asked to make and the gravity of the
consequences of giving the direction. To borrow the words of Dixon J in Briginshaw v
Briginshaw, the necessary degree of satisfaction cannot be produced “by inexact proofs,
indefinite testimony or indirect inferences”. It will require cogent and acceptable evidence
in order to justify the making of the declaration and the giving of the direction. But even
then, there is a residual discretion conferred by the use of the word “may” in the subsection.
In that respect it may also be appropriate to consider, as in the case of R v Fahey and R v
Riley whether, if a sentence is also imposed, the defendant is likely, at the end of the
custodial period, to resume similar sexual activities. This will, in turn, require
consideration, among other things, of the defendant’s access to and the likely effect of
various regimes of treatment, and whether they can be effected in the prison setting or in
some other institution contemplated by the section.
(citations omitted)
1 Hoare v The Queen [2017] SASC 7 at [63] (Hinton J) (His Honour considering similar provisions under
previous sentencing legislation).
2 R v Schuster [2016] SASCFC 86; (2016) 125 SASR 388 at [97]-[98] (Kourakis CJ, Blue and Doyle JJ)
(Their Honours considering similar provisions under previous sentencing legislation).
3 Attorney-General (SA) v Driver [2021] SASC 66 at [22] (Livesey J) citing, R v Hoare [2017] SASC 7
at [63] (Hinton J).
4 Attorney-General (SA) v Driver [2021] SASC 66 at [24] (Livesey J) quoting, R v Hoare [2017] SASC
7 at [65] (Hinton J)
5 [2017] SASC 7 at [65] (Hinton J).
6 [2004] SASC 20 at [56]; (2004) 87 SASR 411 at 423-4 (Bleby J).
-- 9 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
8
44 These observations are apposite in the exercise of the discretion required by
s 57(7) of the Act.7
45 The paramount consideration is the protection of the safety of the community,
whether generally or as individuals. The exercise to be undertaken by the Court
remains a balancing exercise. The Act does not prescribe a minimum acceptable
risk because such risk cannot be measured with precision. In Hoare, Hinton J
adopted observations made in R v Schuster8 to the effect that the safety of the
community is not a condition precedent to the favourable exercise of the discretion.
The Court is not required to be satisfied there is no or no material risk to the safety
of the community before the discretion is enlivened. The question is whether the
community’s protection is adequately ensured.9 An order for supervised release
should, in principle, be preferred to a detention order if supervision is apt to ensure
adequate protection having regard to the risk posed to the community. This is
because the intrusions of the Act upon the liberty of the subject are exceptional
and such liberty should be constrained to no greater extent than is warranted by the
legislation.10
46 Justice Hinton observed that this approach applies in the case of an
application for indeterminate detention. Consequently, if the Court is satisfied the
offender is incapable or unwilling to control his or her sexual instincts, the question
is whether an order for indeterminate detention is appropriate to ensure adequate
protection of the community having regard to the risk to the community posed by
the offender.
Psychiatric and other reports
47 I received a report of Dr Haeney dated 2 November 2022 and reports of
Dr Raeside dated 16 November 2019, 15 September 2022, and 6 December 2022.
I heard oral evidence from Dr Raeside. Dr Haeney was not required for cross-
examination.
Reports of Dr Raeside
Report in support of previous extended supervision order
48 Dr Raeside is a specialist psychiatrist practising in consultant forensic
psychiatry with significant experience in his area of expertise.
49 Dr Raeside previously assessed Mr Crouch for the purposes of an application
for an ESO. Dr Raeside considered Mr Crouch to have significant underlying
psychosexual problems which did not fall neatly into a particular diagnostic label.
Dr Raeside diagnosed Mr Crouch as suffering from mixed personality disorder
7 Attorney-General (SA) v Driver [2021] SASC 66 at [25] (Livesey J).
8 [2016] SASCFC 86; (2016) 125 SASR 388.
9 R v Schuster [2016] SASCFC 86; (2016) 125 SASR 388 at [79] (Kourakis CJ, Blue and Doyle JJ).
10 R v Schuster [2016] SASCFC 86; (2016) 125 SASR 388 at [83] (Kourakis CJ, Blue and Doyle JJ)
quoting, Attorney-General (Qld) v Francis [2006] QCA 324; [2007] 1 Qd R 396 at [39] (Keane and
Holmes JJA, Dutney J).
-- 10 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
9
with antisocial and borderline traits, chronic post traumatic stress disorder and
unspecified paraphilia.
50 At the time of preparing his report, Dr Raeside supported the application for
an ESO as he considered Mr Crouch was at an ongoing significant risk of further
sexual offending in the community based on his history and because he had
obtained limited benefit from various sexual offender programs.
51 Dr Raeside noted the risk would increase if Mr Crouch were to abuse
substances that would further affect his emotional control and regulation.
Dr Raeside considered the fact Mr Crouch re-offended shortly after completing an
extended sentence increased concern.
Report in support of indefinite detention order
52 Dr Raeside observed that Mr Crouch in interview did not appear depressed
or elevated in mood nor unduly anxious. He did not display any psychotic features
such as delusional ideas, psychotic thought disorder, or perceptual disturbances.
53 In addition to chronic neck pain and back pain and well controlled
hypertension, Mr Crouch had been diagnosed with low grade prostate cancer.
Dr Raeside understood that there was no suggestion of spread and Mr Crouch was
not actively receiving treatment but was on a watch program.
54 Mr Crouch reported some issues with his mental health. He had anxiety and
concern about his prostate cancer diagnosis and his future.
55 Dr Raeside summarised Mr Crouch as a 53 year old single man who
experienced difficulties in his childhood with bullying and teasing, experiencing
some identity disturbance, aggravated by being sexually abused in adolescence.
As an adult he was sexually assaulted at gunpoint in a home invasion and was
injured in a separate home invasion. He developed several post-traumatic stress
symptoms and probably a post-traumatic stress disorder. He has been on
antidepressants for many years.
56 Mr Crouch’s explanation to Dr Raeside for the child exploitation material
was a spiral of his post-traumatic stress disorder, difficulties sleeping and feeling
depressed and anxious. Mr Crouch said he discovered old computer discs and “did
a recovery” on some files finding, among other things, child exploitation material.
While claiming he did not know what was on the devices, Dr Raeside observed
that Mr Crouch’s other comments contradicted that position. Mr Crouch
acknowledged to Dr Raeside that he went through the materials, reviewed them,
kept some child exploitation material and put them on a separate file. Mr Crouch
explained he was feeling down and viewing them made him feel better.
57 Dr Raeside considered Mr Crouch’s explanation and comments suggested
there was motivation for him to recover the files and the conduct was not simply
accidental.
-- 11 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
10
58 Dr Raeside asked Mr Crouch about the many thousands of child exploitation
material images. Mr Crouch responded that when he did a recovery on his disc,
files would have been duplicated. In the opinion of Dr Raeside, Mr Crouch missed
the point of the question, which was why he would have so many images.
59 Mr Crouch did not explain why he had the digital eBook and copies of trial
transcripts. Mr Crouch claimed he had never read the whole book, that the book
did not promote sex with children, and it was not intended to be a manual.
Mr Crouch described curiosity as to how such a book could be written and
published, seemingly distancing himself from the actual material.
60 Mr Crouch acknowledged finding images of his victim from 2007 and
looking at them but denied doing so for sexual stimulation. Mr Crouch claimed it
helped him because it reminded him that he had abused her trust.
61 Dr Raeside considered Mr Crouch demonstrated minimisation and other
cognitive distortions around his offending, that he appeared detached in terms of
its significance and demonstrated no understanding of the impact on the victims.
62 When asked whether he thought he was a risk for further sexual offending,
Mr Crouch said he did not want to hurt anyone else. When asked about past
offending, he said he did not understand the impact he was having.
63 Dr Raeside observed that Mr Crouch had not had any mental health or further
sexual offender therapy since 2019.
64 He referred to his discussions with Mr Crouch in 2019 including strategies
Mr Crouch planned to use to prevent further offending. Dr Raeside said Mr Crouch
had not used his strategies more recently and previous sentencing remarks
suggested he had not learnt from his previous offending despite imprisonment.
65 Dr Raeside reported that in previous participation in the Sexual Behaviour
Clinic program, it was thought Mr Crouch developed some greater insight but he
failed to use the necessary skills. Mr Crouch’s sexual offending was thought in
part to be due to a use of sexual arousal as a coping strategy for dealing with
traumatic events and persistent depression. Dr Raeside noted that this continued
to be problematic.
66 Dr Raeside thought that Mr Crouch’s offending involving filming
neighbouring children and having possession of child pornography suggested
ongoing sexual interest concerning children as well as adults. Mr Crouch’s only
long term significant heterosexual relationship to an ex-wife involved diverse
sexual behaviour.
67 Dr Raeside formed the view that Mr Crouch intentionally sought child
exploitation material that he had found maladaptively to help with feelings of
anxiety and depression. Dr Raeside considered Mr Crouch used sex as a coping
-- 12 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
11
mechanism but with deviant and distorted sexual interest and arousal. He observed
that Mr Crouch continued to distort, minimise and detach in relation to the issues.
68 Dr Raeside considered that Mr Crouch has significant underlying
psychosexual problems that do not fall neatly in a diagnostic label such as
paedophilia because of Mr Crouch’s obvious sexual interest in adults as well.
However, his sexual offending involved underage children and was not simply
restricted to images. Dr Raeside referred to possession of the trial transcripts of
victims of abuse as presumably being for deviant sexual arousal.
69 Dr Raeside assessed Mr Crouch as having underlying chronic post-traumatic
stress disorder best conceptualised as mixed personality disorder with borderline
and antisocial traits and with non-specific paraphilia.
70 Dr Raeside considered Mr Crouch had an ongoing significant risk of further
sexual offending. He reached this view taking into account his history and the
limited benefit obtained from various sexual offender programs. That risk would
increase if Mr Crouch abused substances. He referred to Mr Crouch’s intravenous
use of methamphetamine out of curiosity and breaching his ESO as suggesting a
recklessness and disregard for restrictions to assist him to control his behaviour.
71 Dr Raeside’s opinion is that Mr Crouch is unwilling to control his sexual
instincts in the sense that if, given the opportunity, he would likely act on his sexual
urges and commit further offences. He further opined that Mr Crouch is at
significant risk of not only engaging in child exploitation material but committing
contact sexual offending.
72 Dr Raeside supported the application for indefinite detention. He observed
that while there may be little benefit to a further referral, further Sexual Behaviour
Clinic assessment and management was probably appropriate.
Further report
73 On 6 December 2022, Dr Raeside provided a further brief report concerning
anti-libidinal medication.
74 Dr Raeside noted that such medication is used to reduce testosterone level.
However, sexual drive and urges are not simply a biological response to
testosterone but involve psychological and social factors as well. It would not
change the person’s sexual preference, deviant or otherwise, but could potentially
reduce the likelihood of acting on such urges.
75 While such medication may be used in the treatment of prostate cancer,
Mr Crouch was not receiving such medication.
Evidence of Dr Raeside
76 Dr Raeside considered the possession of child exploitation material in 2022
represented a continuation of a similar pattern of Mr Crouch’s previous offending.
-- 13 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
12
In his view, the fact that Mr Crouch was accessing court transcripts and previous
images suggested an ongoing interest and a high risk of moving to contact
offending if the opportunity presented itself.
77 He said Mr Crouch has had an ongoing pattern of offending when not
incarcerated and when he has had the opportunity to offend. Despite periods of
imprisonment, not only had Mr Crouch failed to not re-offend but he also had
breached conditions. This suggested to Dr Raeside that the Court’s supervision
order conditions were insufficient to control Mr Crouch.
78 Mr Crouch’s most prominent diagnoses are chronic post-traumatic stress
disorder and a mixed borderline and antisocial personality disorder. Dr Raeside
said a longstanding maladaptive pattern of behaving is not a mental illness and is
not amenable to medication but is a mental health problem.
79 Dr Raeside diagnosed Mr Crouch with non-specific paraphilia, denoting any
inappropriate sexual arousal, sexual behaviour or deviancy including paedophilia.
Mr Crouch’s past offending suggested paedophilia or paedophilic tendencies but
Mr Crouch has sexual interest in adults as well. He said Mr Crouch had progressed
to more interest in children and into further ranging sexual deviance and the
breadth of the diagnosis generated more concern because of Mr Crouch’s sexual
deviancy.
80 Dr Raeside explained the factors used to predict a risk of re-offending being
likelihood, magnitude, frequency and imminence. Dr Raeside explained the
importance of not only focussing on the likelihood of an offender committing a
further offence but considering whether the likelihood was imminent or in the
future, considering the severity or magnitude of the potential offending and the
frequency of such behaviours in the past.
81 In the case of Mr Crouch, Dr Raeside opined that the risk of potential
offending was high because Mr Crouch has had contact offences against children
in the past and remains at risk of contact offending in the future. Dr Raeside
predicted the potential for re-offending to occur soon after being released based on
Mr Crouch’s previous behaviour which suggested he re-offended relatively soon
after release from custody when given the opportunity to do so. Dr Raeside
considered there was a likelihood Mr Crouch would again engage in such
behaviour which could involve online child exploitation material or may progress
to contact offending.
82 While a clear and strong association between viewing online images and
progressing to contact offending has not been demonstrated, in the case of
Mr Crouch, Dr Raeside thought Mr Crouch would be at high risk of either online
pornography or contact offending because of his past offending. Dr Raeside was
of the view that accessing court transcripts for the sexual arousal of re-living
trauma the victims went through, accessing images of his prior victim, and
-- 14 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
13
accessing the eBook suggesting how to contact offend dramatically increased the
risk of Mr Crouch engaging in further contact offending.
83 Dr Raeside accordingly expressed the opinion that Mr Crouch is at high risk
on all relevant factors for both non-contact and contact offending.
84 Nothing will ameliorate the effect of Mr Crouch’s static risk factors including
gender, age, past criminal history and victimisation. Dr Raeside agreed that if
Mr Crouch’s dynamic factors, including substance abuse and mental health, were
capable of change that would alter the risk of re-offending. One such key factor
was Mr Crouch feeling depressed and turning to maladaptive behaviour to make
himself feel better. Consequently, not being depressed and abstaining from illicit
drugs and alcohol would assist. Dr Raeside nevertheless thought the weight of
Mr Crouch’s static factors, particularly his past history, suggested Mr Crouch
would remain at high risk although less so than if he was depressed or abusing
substances.
85 Dr Raeside said custodial sentences do not appear to have acted as a deterrent
apart from the fact that Mr Crouch had not had further contact offending since
2007. That could have been a result of the deterrent factor of custody. However,
Dr Raeside also said that Mr Crouch’s breach of supervision conditions suggested
Mr Crouch had not done everything he could have done to avoid further re-
offending.
86 Dr Raeside suspected that Mr Crouch had shifted to child exploitation
material for his primary sexual gratification since coming out of custody after the
2007 offences. It was important in his view that in breaching the ESO, Mr Crouch
did not simply take drugs or drink but attempted to access the internet and thus
took steps that would increase his risk of further offending.
87 Dr Raeside was reluctant to say Mr Crouch had no insight, but observed that
Mr Crouch has a number of cognitive distortions including minimising prior
behaviour and minimising the risk in which he placed himself and impaired insight
in not recognising the nature of activities and the risks they pose. As an example
he referred to Mr Crouch’s response when asked about the material with which
Mr Crouch was found. Mr Crouch initially said he had that material for years, then
denied it promoted sex with children, and then said he had curiosity in it.
Dr Raeside regarded this as a form of cognitive distortion and minimisation and
thought any suggestion that Mr Crouch was interested in reading the material as
an article rather than for sexual gratification was implausible. He said that while
Mr Crouch did not deny his prior offending, he tended to minimise it as not being
significant.
88 Dr Raeside said that any use of methamphetamine would increase risk
through the effect of increasing sexual arousal and as alcohol is disinhibitory,
a combination of methamphetamine and alcohol would be a particularly
problematic mix.
-- 15 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
14
89 Dr Raeside referred to past programs in which Mr Crouch had engaged
including at Owenia House, while in the community and two Sexual Behaviour
Clinic programs in custody. He considered that Mr Crouch was not suited to the
SBC-me program which is a modified program for those with poor literacy,
numeracy or actual intellectual disability. Mr Crouch’s difficulties related more
to his emotional capacity. However, given that Mr Crouch had completed the
programs before and failed to benefit from them, if he were to take part in another
SBC program in custody, Dr Raeside said a modified version may be worth
considering.
90 Dr Raeside thought the treatment course was not effective given Mr Crouch
had continued to offend after completing the SBC. He did not necessarily agree
that with each subsequent course the efficacy decreases because Mr Crouch’s
maturity or insight or motivation might change. However, Dr Raeside said that if
the course does not address the underlying problem, repeating it will not matter.
91 Dr Raeside opined that Mr Crouch is unwilling to control his sexual instincts
and there is a high risk that should Mr Crouch have the opportunity to act, he would
choose to act on his sexual instincts. He did not however think Mr Crouch’s sexual
instincts were primarily focussed on children. Mr Crouch had shown interest in
both males and females as well as pre-pubertal and post-pubertal children which
increased the level of risk.
92 Dr Raeside was reluctant to offer any opinion in relation to whether
Mr Crouch was becoming closer to being incapable of controlling his sexual
instincts including because he was not aware of any inappropriate sexual behaviour
in custody.
93 Dr Raeside said Mr Crouch had not trialled anti-libidinal medication to
decrease his testosterone and thus decrease his sexual urges and his likelihood of
acting on them. Anti-libidinal medication would also potentially treat his prostate
cancer as the treatment reduces testosterone. He said a reduction to sufficiently
low testosterone level may be achieved, but that may or may not have any real
bearing on Mr Crouch’s sexual urges and risk of acting. This is because sexual
interest also depends on cognitive and social factors.
94 Dr Raeside considered it possible that anti-libidinal medication may be
effective in combination with a further attempt to address Mr Crouch’s cognitive
distortions. However, he observed that it would not be possible to know whether
treatment was effective while in custody and the only real test would be once
Mr Crouch was released into the community.
95 In cross-examination, Dr Raeside agreed that some people view child
exploitation material for living out fantasies without ever acting on it physically.
However, he maintained that as Mr Crouch continued to be sexually aroused by
such material, he considered it likely that if Mr Crouch had the opportunity,
he would act on it.
-- 16 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
15
96 Dr Raeside thought it likely that Mr Crouch’s sexual drive will decrease with
time particularly with the combination of age, prostate cancer and anti-libidinal
medication, if administered. If Mr Crouch required surgery for his prostate, that
would probably further decrease sexual drive. He agreed there is a reduction in
sex drive with age, that the last contact offending occurred when Mr Crouch was
in his 30s and he is now in his 50s. Dr Raeside clarified that Mr Crouch did not
describe an aversive behaviour to child exploitation material. He said diminishing
sex drive might explain no further contact offending but there were other factors
including the circumstances in which a person finds themselves which may be
relevant. He said it may also be that Mr Crouch did not want to offend against
children, however, the way Mr Crouch responded to his questions in interview
suggested Mr Crouch did not have that level of insight. Dr Raeside opined that
there is a high risk that, should he have the opportunity, Mr Crouch would choose
to act on his sexual instincts.
97 Dr Raeside confirmed that removal of the prostate can result in impotence
and other side effects and that if Mr Crouch were to receive various treatments for
prostate cancer it could quite likely decrease his ability to achieve or maintain an
erection and therefore decrease the opportunity to act on any sexual arousal.
He said that if Mr Crouch no longer achieved physical sexual gratification from
viewing child exploitation material it would reduce his likelihood of continuing to
watch the material at least to the same frequency which would make him less likely
to be sexually aroused in the community.
98 Dr Raeside said the effect of undergoing treatment of anti-libidinal drugs
would be expected to reduce sex drive as testosterone levels reduce. However
individual variable factors will impact on the completeness of the treatment.
99 Dr Raeside did not consider Mr Crouch’s depression to be a cause of why he
looked at the child exploitation material but he said that Mr Crouch may use it as
a form of escape and thus feel less depressed. However, he said that with forms
of addictive behaviour linked to depression, momentary escape from the
unpleasant feelings can occur but often the sufferer feels worse afterwards.
Dr Raeside agreed that a reduction in depression and undertaking hobbies and
other prosocial activities would generally reduce his risk, but he remained of the
view that Mr Crouch would still likely be in the high risk range. Further,
Mr Crouch’s criminal history would limit his ability to take part in activities in the
community.
100 Dr Raeside was unable to answer to what extent a finite sentence with an end
date was likely to encourage rehabilitation. He agreed that an indefinite sentence
can be crushing and result in lack of attempts to rehabilitate. However, he
considered the notion that Mr Crouch may apply for release in the future might be
a motivation to engage in rehabilitation programs.
-- 17 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
16
Report of Dr Haeney
101 On 2 November 2022, Dr Haeney provided a report in relation to Mr Crouch.
Dr Haeney is a consultant forensic psychiatrist with significant relevant
experience.
102 Dr Haeney summarised Mr Crouch’s history of offending and the various
reports obtained including the report of Dr Raeside in 2019 for the ESO
application.
103 Mr Crouch told Dr Haeney that he commenced using child exploitation
material again after an event towards the end of 2020 where he was awoken by a
bang from his neighbour’s house and he heard retreating footsteps and he felt this
triggered his symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder from his previous home
invasion. Mr Crouch said it made him feel better because he had used it before
and it was an escape from reality. It took him back to the days when he played
“doctors and nurses” with kids in the street. Restarting the use of child exploitation
material left him feeling conflicted because he knew it was wrong and he thought
he would end up back in gaol but it made him feel better. Mr Crouch told
Dr Haeney that he believed he had little to lose given how low he was feeling and
he associated his offending with depression.
104 Mr Crouch told Dr Haeney that after an admission to hospital in April 2021
he began using the internet and developed an interest in cryptocurrency.
He enjoyed the process and his use of cryptocurrency started to replace his child
exploitation material habit. He then began joining social media sites. Mr Crouch
knew of his reporting obligations. When asked if he was allowed to use social
media, Mr Crouch’s response was that it was little bit grey. When police inspected
his devices in early March 2021, child exploitation material was not found because
it was saved on a USB he did not disclose. Mr Crouch said he was using child
exploitation material three or four times a week, looking at it and sometimes
masturbating.
105 When asked about the extent of the child exploitation material found,
Mr Crouch said a lot of it dated back to 2012 to 2014. He said he performed a
recovery on SD cards and acknowledged that maybe he was hoping there was child
exploitation material but said there were personal photos he wished to recover.
106 Mr Crouch acknowledged he was most sexually aroused by activity
displaying sexual interactions between children aged eight or above. His preferred
sexual interest was mainly females but also some males generally 10 years old or
above, but he maintained he was not generally interested in sadomasochism,
bondage, or domination. While acknowledging some material discovered
involved sadistic behaviour, he said it was not right, but he had kept the material
because it would make him stop and think and give him a reality check.
107 Mr Crouch maintained that he had not made attempts to contact children.
He said he downloaded the eBook years ago and was not much of a reader and so
-- 18 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
17
had never got around to reading the full material and he did not intend to use it as
a how-to guide.
108 Mr Crouch maintained the material from the Court was obtained to undertake
research.
109 Mr Crouch told Dr Haeney he had downloaded some child exploitation
material but found some through salvaging hard drives at his waste recycling work.
If he found child exploitation material he would use it. He acknowledged
recording his neighbours’ children and that he found the elder girl to be attractive.
He denied any face-to-face contact but said he had masturbated to the recordings.
110 Mr Crouch acknowledged the sexual abuse of his stepson was wrong, but he
told himself his stepson was not suffering ill effects, it was not doing a great deal
of harm, and if he was caught Mr Crouch would kill himself. He described the
abuse of the 14 year old girl coming to light when someone stayed with him.
Mr Crouch described that person as supposedly a friend. Dr Haeney thought this
suggested Mr Crouch felt aggrieved at their intervention.
111 Mr Crouch said the Sexual Behaviour Clinic and Sexual Offender Treatment
and Assessment Program taught him that victims and their families were likely to
suffer. He said the children portrayed in child exploitation material were abused
to develop the material and that obtaining the material perpetuates people doing
evil. Nevertheless, Mr Crouch continued to use child exploitation material saying
he sometimes wished he could go back to being a kid exploring his sexuality with
other kids.
112 Dr Haeney noted that Mr Crouch had previously been diagnosed with either
an unspecified paraphilia or paedophilia and had a long and diverse history of
sexual offending. Shortly after he completed his sentence for the offending against
his stepson, he offended against his particularly vulnerable 14 year old female
neighbour by grooming and sexually abusing her.
113 Despite his second period of imprisonment and completing the Sexual
Behaviour Clinic program, Mr Crouch offended again through possession of child
exploitation material and covertly filming his neighbours’ children. Despite being
released on an ESO, he was arrested again in March 2022.
114 Dr Haeney performed a risk assessment utilising the framework of the Risk
for Sexual Violence Protocol. The Protocol identifies 22 factors associated with
risk of sexual offending clustered over five domains, being sexual violence history,
psychological adjustment, mental disorder, social adjustment and manageability.
Each item is assessed for presence and relevance and relevant factors are used to
develop a formulation of an individual’s sexual violence offending, considering
potential scenarios for further offending and management plans. The Protocol
does not generate an estimate of the likelihood of an individual perpetrating further
-- 19 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
18
sexual violence offending but judgments can be made on the analysis of risk factors
and the feasibility of management plans.
115 Dr Haeney observed that Mr Crouch had engaged in contact and non-contact
offending within the Protocol. He said it could not be said that Mr Crouch’s
offending had escalated given the most serious offences were his earliest
offending. It was unclear whether treatment had prevented further contact
offending or further contact offending had been curtailed by other factors such as
supervision. Psychological coercion or grooming was evident.
116 Dr Haeney considered Mr Crouch did not display extreme minimisation or
denial and he broadly accepted his previous offences and current charges.
However, there was some noticeable rationalisation and minimisation. Mr Crouch
continued to rationalise his most recent offending portraying it as a response to
reactivated PTSD, isolation and depression. Mr Crouch portrayed his decision to
download and keep sadistic child exploitation material as a reality check and
insisted much of the material found was recovered from deleted files in searching
for personal photographs. Dr Haeney considered that the instructional eBook
suggested Mr Crouch condoned sexual abuse of children. Dr Haeney said while
Mr Crouch could refer to many core themes of the treatment he had completed,
despite the work he has undertaken he continued to offend often within a short
period of release. Dr Haeney thought Mr Crouch’s justifications suggested
significant difficulty with ongoing self-awareness.
117 Dr Haeney considered Mr Crouch showed clear evidence of sexual deviance
which has a strong link with sexual offending. Given the broad nature of child
exploitation material images found, Dr Haeney considered there is a possibility of
interest in sadism and bondage. Despite his antisociality, Dr Haeney considered
Mr Crouch does not appear to meet the criteria for psychopathic personality
disorder. Dr Haeney considered Mr Crouch does not have a major mental illness
directly relevant to his offending, but he had a history of substance abuse.
His offending did not appear to be directly mediated by substance misuse.
118 The domain of manageability was cause for significant further concern as
Dr Haeney considered Mr Crouch resistant to treatment for his sexual re-
offending. Dr Haeney considered it significant that Mr Crouch had consistently
re-offended despite three treatment programs in which Mr Crouch apparently
engaged well and despite an ESO and ANCOR registration. Accordingly,
Dr Haeney considered the prospect of response to further treatment not promising.
119 Mr Crouch demonstrated a number of concerning risk factors that will remain
live going forward which have not been adequately addressed. Dr Haeney
described Mr Crouch’s offending as long lasting, diverse and immutable and not
prevented by treatment and supervision.
120 Dr Haeney considered Mr Crouch’s deviant sexual drive persisted with
evidence of previous and ongoing cognitive distortions which increased his risk of
-- 20 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
19
recidivism. Mr Crouch’s long history of offending despite treatment and
supervision demonstrated significant risk that he would re-offend if given the
opportunity to do so.
Department of Correctional Services information
121 A letter dated 18 May 2023 from the Department for Correctional Services
to the Director records that Mr Crouch completed sexual offending programs in
2009 and 2018. Participation in those programs and the benefit of completing
another program of the same type would be considered by the Sentence
Management Unit in conjunction with the Rehabilitation Programs Branch.
122 Mr Crouch previously completed the Sexual Behaviour Clinic which is
delivered to sentenced prisoners assessed at being a moderate to high risk of sexual
re-offending. He would have to consent to participate in assessment for the
programs.
123 A special aspects pre-sentence report prepared on 12 December 2023 by the
Department for Correctional Services identified the SBC-me program as a program
delivered to sentenced prisoners assessed at being moderate to high risk of sexual
re-offending who have identified intellectual, learning or developmental
disabilities.
124 The program uses psychological techniques to address values, attitudes,
emotions, and behaviours that contribute to sexual offending. Key treatment areas
include problematic sexual fantasy and arousal, offence supportive attitudes,
empathy and victim awareness, intimacy and relationships, emotional
management, and substance abuse. The purpose is to contribute to public safety
by giving offenders the skills to manage their thoughts and emotions and improve
their ability to deal with problem situations.
125 Programs run for different lengths of time and are scheduled according to
need. Prisoners assessed as eligible are added to a wait list which is prioritised
according to conditional release dates and sentence end dates. Program scheduling
also considers availability of prison room locations and staff availability.
126 Mr Crouch completed the SBC program in Port Lincoln Prison. The letter
stated that the strict criteria in relation to suitability for the SBC-me course would
not be overridden to include Mr Crouch in the program. Further, Mr Crouch
needed to be sentenced before he can be assessed for suitability for the SBC-me
course. If cognitive testing was required, this may add to the time required to
assess what program would be most suitable for Mr Crouch.
127 Once a sentenced person’s individual development plan is finalised for the
SBC, generally a minimum of 12 to 18 months in custody prior to end of release
date is required to allow participation.
-- 21 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
20
Prison health report
128 A report dated 6 December 2023 from Prison Health Services indicates
prostate cancer level tests are conducted every three months to assess Mr Crouch.
His results show stability and reduction in levels from March to September 2023.
A prostate MRI in July 2023 showed stable disease in comparison to imaging in
July 2022. In August 2023, Mr Crouch was offered and declined a further biopsy
as he would need to be transferred to Adelaide. No other treatment was proposed
at this stage.
129 There were no records documenting testosterone or androgen deprivation
therapy.
Prosecution submissions
130 The prosecution relied on a number of matters, which I summarise below, in
support of the contention that Mr Crouch is incapable of controlling, or unwilling
to control, his sexual instincts.
1. Dr Raeside’s opinion that Mr Crouch is unwilling to control his sexual
instincts; that if given the opportunity he would likely act on his sexual
urges and commit further offences; and that he is at significant risk of
not only engaging in child exploitation material but again committing
contact sexual offending.
2. Dr Haeney’s acknowledgement that while Mr Crouch was able to refer
to many core themes of the sexual offending treatment programs,
he nevertheless continued to offend often within a short period
following release from custody. Mr Crouch acknowledged to Dr
Haeney that he was most sexually aroused by activity showing sexual
interactions between children from aged eight or above and his
preferred sexual interest was mainly females but also males usually 10
years of age and above.
3. Dr Haeney’s view that Mr Crouch’s offending shows chronicity and
diversity and has spanned 30 years despite imprisonment and treatment
programs.
4. Dr Haeney’s opinion that those who commit multiple kinds of sexual
offences are at increased risk of recidivism. Mr Crouch’s long history
of offending despite treatment and supervision demonstrated a
significant risk he will re-offend given the opportunity to do so.
5. Both Dr Raeside and Dr Haeney opined that Mr Crouch is unwilling to
control his sexual instincts within the meaning of s 57(1) and
accordingly the power exercisable under s 57(7) is enlivened.
-- 22 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
21
131 In relation to the whether the discretion should be exercised to order
indefinite detention, the prosecution relied on the following matters as weighing
strongly in favour of such an order.
1. Mr Crouch is at a high risk of further sexual offending with an extensive
history of contact and non-contact offending extending to both males
and females across pre-pubertal and post-pubertal age ranges.
Offending against both male and females as well as pre-pubertal and
post-pubertal aged children increases the risk because the offending is
broader in nature.
2. Mr Crouch’s earliest known offending commenced in 1989 and
concluded with his arrest most recently in 2022.
3. Mr Crouch has committed serious sexual offending and received
substantial terms of imprisonment.
4. Drug and alcohol use are not causative factors, however substance
abuse is a disinhibiting factor in Mr Crouch ’s offending.
5. Mr Crouch has participated in three sexual offending programs so far
with apparently little benefit. There is conflicting evidence regarding
Mr Crouch’s self-awareness. Thus far, no forms of treatment have
impacted upon his offending behaviour.
6. Dr Raeside gave evidence it would be unusual for a prisoner to do more
than two courses of sexual offending programs. He observed that it
would not matter how many times a person did the program if the course
is not really addressing the underlying problems.
7. No other forms of treatment are likely to have an impact on Mr
Crouch’s risk of re-offending.
8. The evidence suggests Mr Crouch has not adequately addressed his
static risk factors. While Mr Crouch’s risk profile may change,
nevertheless, Dr Raeside’s opinion is that Mr Crouch would still remain
at high risk, but less high risk than if he were depressed or abusing
substances.
9. Mr Crouch poses a high risk of further sexual offending. Mr Crouch
has accessed court transcripts and previous images suggesting an
ongoing interest with a high risk of moving to contact offending if Mr
Crouch has the opportunity to do so.
10. Mr Crouch has continued to reoffend despite being subject to ANCOR
obligations and being placed on an ESO. Further, the breaches of the
ESO were in relation to attempts to access the internet and thus taking
steps which would increase the risk of further offending.
-- 23 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
22
11. Any trial of anti-libidinal medication has not commenced. Further,
levels of testosterone may or may not have any real bearing on Mr
Crouch’s sexual urges. There is no information relating to testosterone
treatment or androgen deprivation therapy documented in prison health
medical records. The only inference to draw is that Mr Crouch is not on
a formal wait list to commence such treatment. There is no objective
measure in relation to the efficacy of the treatment insofar as it relates
to reducing a risk of further offending. Dr Raeside suggested that a trial
of antilibidinal medication could commence prior to completion of
another program, such as the SBC-me, but could not offer any opinion
as whether Mr Crouch would be considered appropriate for that
modified program.
12. As Mr Crouch has been in custody since March 2022, any sentence
would be backdated. If potential treatment options were to be made
available the length of incarceration would need to incorporate an
antilibidinal trial, completion of the SBC-me course (if Mr Crouch was
deemed suitable) and evaluation of the effectiveness of both courses
which would not take into account potential wait lists for the courses.
13. The procedural mechanism for the Attorney-General to apply to the
Supreme Court under ss 57(3), (4) and (5) cannot be made more than
12 months before a person is eligible to apply for release on parole. The
timeframe in which to bring such an application may be narrow. It is
likely nothing will change in the intervening period so as to appreciably
reduce the risk of Mr Crouch returning to the community.
14. The application is not premature taking into consideration the likely
length of sentence and the length of time of any further treatment in
custody, assuming Mr Crouch was considered a suitable candidate.
15. Mr Crouch had historically re-offended soon after release as follows:
(a) release on parole in September 2004, head sentence expiring
December 2005, contact offending in March 2006;
(b) release from custody in April 2012, offence relating to listening
device in July 2014 and possess child exploitation material in
March 2015;
(c) release from custody in May 2020, offence relating to child
exploitation material in March 2022.
This was consistent with offending approximately two years after
release.
16. An order for indefinite detention is required to achieve a satisfactory
level of protection for the community.
-- 24 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
23
Defence submissions
132 Mr Crouch opposed the s 57 application.
133 Mr Crouch accepted he had been convicted of a relevant offence and admitted
the contents of his offender history report and his prior convictions.
134 Mr Crouch accepted the pre-requisite to making an order, that is, satisfaction
he is unwilling to control his sexual instincts, was established. However,
Mr Crouch submitted the application ought to be dismissed as the making of such
an order would not be appropriate because protection of the community is not
required.
135 Mr Crouch relied on the fact he has not committed contact offending since
2006, a period of approximately 18 years, as a matter of significance. Mr Crouch
pointed to Dr Raeside’s acceptance that a diminishing in sex drive may explain
why there has been no further contact offending given Mr Crouch is now in his
50s and the last contact offending occurred when he was in his 30s. Mr Crouch
also referred to Dr Raeside’s acceptance that diminishing sex drive could be one
of the reasons and it was possible Mr Crouch did not want to offend against
children.
136 Mr Crouch submitted that the exceptional step of an order for indefinite
detention based on what it is feared a person might do should not be taken in all of
the circumstances in light of Dr Raeside’s evidence.
137 Mr Crouch distinguished his position from cases such as Driver11 and
Mountford12 which involved significant contact offending.
138 Relying on the statement by Dr Haeney to the effect that it cannot be said
with any reliability that Mr Crouch’s offending had escalated given that his contact
sexual offending was his earliest offending, Mr Crouch submitted there has not
been escalation but rather a reduction in his offending given there had been no
contact offending for some time.
139 Mr Crouch submitted that in all of the circumstances, I should hesitate in
granting the application given there has been approximately 18 years since any
contact offending. He submitted that the Court did not know what might or may
occur in the future, including in the circumstances in which Mr Crouch was to be
sentenced for his offending and he accepted a significant sentence of imprisonment
would be opposed. Mr Crouch submitted the s 57 application could be deferred.
Is Mr Crouch unwilling to control his sexual instincts?
140 Mr Crouch did not dispute the opinions of the psychiatrists. In any event,
I am satisfied that the evidence cogently establishes that Mr Crouch has been
11 Attorney-General (SA) v Driver [2021] SASC 66.
12 R v Mountford [2019] SASC 16.
-- 25 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
24
convicted of a relevant offence and that Mr Crouch is unwilling to control his
sexual instincts within the meaning of the legislation.
141 Mr Crouch accepted that the prerequisites to the exercise of the discretion are
enlivened.
Exercise of discretion
142 I must consider the risk that Mr Crouch poses to the community and whether
an order for indefinite detention is required for the protection of the community in
the sense explained by the authorities to which I have referred above.
143 In the circumstances of this case, the factors most relevant to the assessment
of the protection of the safety of the community, having regard to the risk to the
community posed by Mr Crouch, are:
• the opinions of Dr Raeside and Dr Haeney;
• the nature of Mr Crouch’s offending;
• the relevance of Mr Crouch’s contact offending last occurring in 2006;
• Mr Crouch’s age;
• Mr Crouch’s prostate cancer and its potential implications;
• Mr Crouch’s engagement in past treatment programs and the impact of
those programs;
• potential further treatment and programs;
• the potential deterrent effect of custodial sentences and other court
orders and obligations.
144 While I have focussed on these matters, I have taken into account all of the
material before me and the submissions in considering the exercise of the
discretion.
Opinions of the psychiatrists and past offending
145 I have set out above the history of offending and the summaries of the reports
and opinions of Dr Raeside and Dr Haeney. The history is acknowledged by Mr
Crouch.
146 Neither Dr Raeside nor Dr Haeney are of the view that Mr Crouch should be
released back to the community.
Length of time since contact offending
147 Mr Crouch has not committed contact offended since 2006.
-- 26 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
25
148 Of the time that has elapsed since his last contact offending, that is,
approximately 18 years, Mr Crouch has spent over 12 years in custody. He has re-
offended on each occasion about two years after release.
149 As Mr Crouch’s contact offending was his first offending, Mr Crouch’s
offending cannot be described as having escalated. It is unclear what factors have
resulted in Mr Crouch not committing further contact offending. However, despite
the chronology of offending, Dr Raeside considered Mr Crouch remains a
significant risk of not only engaging in child exploitation material but also
committing contact sexual offending. I will not summarise again the matters upon
which Dr Raeside relied. I note, however, the significance of Mr Crouch’s
possession of the eBook, trial transcripts and images of his previous victim which
Dr Raeside considered indicated Mr Crouch’s ongoing interest and a high risk of
moving to contact offending if there was an available opportunity. Mr Crouch’s
explanations for his possession of, and access to, those materials were not plausible
and the relatively recent access to those materials was consistent with Mr Crouch
remaining interested in them.
150 Dr Haeney also considered Mr Crouch at significant risk of re-offending if
given the opportunity. While Dr Haeney did not opine expressly on Mr Crouch’s
risk of returning to contact offending, he pointed to Mr Crouch’s deviant sexual
drive and ongoing cognitive distortions as increasing the risk of recidivism.
151 I accept the opinions concerning the overall risk and Dr Raeside’s specific
opinion as to the risk of Mr Crouch resuming contact offending.
152 While there is a risk of offending against adults, the psychiatric reports
indicate risk in relation to children of both genders, teenagers and young children.
Age
153 Mr Crouch is now in his 50s. Dr Raeside accepted diminishing sex drive
might explain the absence of further contact offending. However, as sexual
interest also depends on cognitive and social factors, Mr Crouch’s age may or may
not have any real bearing on his sexual urges and risk of acting on such.
154 Dr Raeside and Dr Haeney were aware of Mr Crouch’s age when they formed
their respective opinions as to Mr Crouch’s risk profile which was not of itself
sufficient to result in a reduction in their assessment of his risk.
Prostate cancer
155 Mr Crouch has been diagnosed with prostate cancer. While treatment such
as removal of his prostate or anti-libidinal medication could decrease his
opportunity to act on any sexual arousal, there is no evidence that Mr Crouch is to
have any such treatment. As set out above, he has declined a biopsy and regular
testing confirms his disease is stable and controlled.
-- 27 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
26
Potential deterrence
156 Custodial sentences have not acted as a deterrent, although Dr Raeside
accepted it is possible that incarceration had deterred Mr Crouch from engaging in
further contact offending.
157 Mr Crouch has breached bail and extended supervision conditions in ways
which increased his risk of further offending.
Treatment programs
158 Mr Crouch has completed the Sexual Behaviour Clinic, or an equivalent,
on three occasions.
159 The consequence of the sentence and non-parole period I have imposed is
that Mr Crouch would remain in custody for a minimum of about 11 months and
a maximum of about 20 months in the absence of an order detaining him
indefinitely. Based on the information in the letter from DCS, this may or may not
be sufficient time to complete a further program.
160 I have considered whether the prospect of Mr Crouch being accepted into,
and completing, a further program is sufficient basis to exercise the discretion to
refuse the application. Even if I assume in Mr Crouch’s favour that he will be able
to, and will take part in, such as program, I have concluded that is not enough by
itself or in combination with other factors to justify refusing the application.
161 Mr Crouch previously engaged in the programs, was able to cite the core
themes to Dr Haeney and learned strategies to implement through completing the
courses. Nevertheless, Mr Crouch continued to offend.
162 Mr Crouch continues to display impaired insight, minimisation and cognitive
distortions.
163 Dr Haeney thought Mr Crouch was resistant to treatment for his sexual re-
offending and considered the prospect of response to further treatment was not
promising.
164 Dr Raeside considered the SBC course was not effective for Mr Crouch.
He took the view that if the course did not address the underlying problem and as
such it would not be rectified by repetition.
165 While Dr Raeside thought a modified SBC-me program may be worth
consideration, there is no suggestion Mr Crouch meets the threshold requirements
for inclusion in such a course.
166 The fact Mr Crouch was able to cite core themes to Dr Haeney does not
suggest the modified SBC-me course was required to enable Mr Crouch to engage
with or understand the course contents.
-- 28 of 29 --
[2024] SASC 57 Stein J
27
167 The opinions of Dr Raeside and Dr Haeney support the conclusion that
further repetition of the available treatment programs are unlikely to be highly
effective. That said, if Mr Crouch in the future asks to engage in rehabilitation
programs, his motivation together with Dr Raeside’s views should be taken into
consideration.
Other factors
168 While it appears that reducing Mr Crouch’s depression and undertaking
hobbies would reduce Mr Crouch’s risk, Dr Raeside thought Mr Crouch would
remain in the high risk range of re-offending.
169 Drugs and alcohol would increase his risk.
170 I have considered the submission that the application for an order should be
deferred while Mr Crouch completes his sentence. Mr Crouch’s prostate cancer
levels are stable. He will not age markedly while serving the balance of his
sentence. His rehabilitation prospects are pessimistic. The material before me
does not support the conclusion that the intervening period of custody may have
considerable impact on Mr Crouch’s risk profile or the factors relevant to the
exercise of my discretion. I am not persuaded that there is sufficiently good reason
to warrant deferring consideration of the application until the end of Mr Crouch’s
sentence.
Conclusion
171 There is ample evidence that Mr Crouch’s risk to the community is high.
172 The members of the public particularly at risk of harm from Mr Crouch are
children, including young children of both genders, who are among the most
vulnerable members of the community.
173 Given that level of risk, the question is whether an order for indefinite
detention is required to ensure adequate protection or some lesser restriction on the
liberty of Mr Crouch would suffice.
174 The opinions of the psychiatrists together with Mr Crouch’s previous
offending while on an extended supervision order supports the view that any such
order would be insufficient to provide adequate protection for the community,
including the group of the community particularly at risk.
175 In my view, based on all of the matters to which I have referred above, an
order for the indefinite detention of Mr Crouch is appropriate.
Orders
176 I order that Mr Crouch be detained in custody until further order pursuant to
s 57(7) of the Sentencing Act. In accordance with s 57(13) of the Sentencing Act
such detention will commence on the expiration of Mr Crouch’s term of
imprisonment.
-- 29 of 29 --