Chen v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service (No 2) [2025] ICQ 29
INDUSTRIAL COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Chen v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service (No 2) [2025]
ICQ 029
PARTIES: VICTOR CHEN
(appellant)
v
GOLD COAST HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICE
(respondent)
FILE NO: C/2023/32
PROCEEDING: Appeal
DELIVERED ON: 4 December 2025
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARING DATE: 3 December 2025
MEMBER: Davis J, President
ORDERS: 1. The appeal is allowed.
2. The order made on 9 August 2023 by the Queensland
Industrial Relations Commission is set aside.
3. There be no order as to costs of the appellant’s
application for interlocutory reinstatement.
4. There be no order as to costs of the appeal.
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – GENERAL
PRINCIPLES – where the appellant was employed by the
respondent – where the appellant was allegedly dismissed from
his employment with the respondent – where the appellant
sought relief alleging unfair dismissal and adverse action –
where the appellant brought an interlocutory application
seeking interim reinstatement – where that application was
dismissed – where the respondent applied for costs of the
interim reinstatement application – where costs of the interim
reinstatement application were awarded in a lump sum against
the appellant – where the appellant appealed the costs order –
where the respondent conceded the appeal – where the
respondent conceded that an order should be made that there
be no costs of the interim reinstatement application or the
appeal – where the respondent’s concessions are made on a
pragmatic basis and without concessions as to the allegations
against the respondent or various individuals – whether there
ought be no order as to costs
Industrial Relations Act 2016 (Qld), s 280
-- 1 of 3 --
2
CASES: Chen v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service [2025] ICQ
017, related
Chen v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service (No. 4) [2023]
QIRC 128, related
Chen v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service (No. 5)
[2023] QIRC 226, related
COUNSEL: The appellant appeared on his own behalf
Mr P M Zielinski for the respondent
SOLICITORS: The appellant acted for himself
MinterEllison for the respondent
[1] Dr Victor Chen, the appellant, appeals against a decision made on 9 August 2023 by
the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission that he pay the costs of the
respondent, fixed at $5,334.00,1 of an unsuccessful application for interlocutory
reinstatement.2
[2] Dr Chen is an interventional cardiologist who was employed by the respondent, the
Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, on a casual basis.
[3] However, from 10 December 2020, Dr Chen was not allocated any casual work by
Gold Coast Health and on 23 December 2020 he filed an application in the
Commission alleging adverse action.3
[4] Dr Chen concluded that his employment had in fact been terminated and so on 12
March 2021, he commenced an application for reinstatement. On 22 June 2021, the
two claims were consolidated.
[5] The proceedings have become quite complicated and there have been many decisions
in the Commission, some of which have been subject to interlocutory appeals.
[6] On 17 February 2023, an application was filed by Dr Chen seeking interim
reinstatement pending the final determination of his claims. Industrial Commissioner
Pidgeon dismissed that application on 9 May 2023.4 On 9 August 2023, Industrial
Commissioner Pidgeon ordered Dr Chen to pay Gold Coast Health’s costs fixed at
$5,334.00.5 The appeal currently before me is from the costs order.
[7] In the current appeal, Dr Chen sought to introduce new evidence on the appeal. That
application was unsuccessful.6
1 Chen v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service (No. 5) [2023] QIRC 226.
2 Chen v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service (No. 4) [2023] QIRC 128.
3 Industrial Relations Act 2016, s 280.
4 Chen v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service (No. 4) [2023] QIRC 128.
5 Chen v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service (No. 5) [2023] QIRC 226.
6 Chen v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service [2025] ICQ 017.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
[8] In the course of giving judgment dismissing the application to adduce new evidence,
I observed:
“[12] Gold Coast Health accepts that Industrial Commissioner Pidgeon erred
in exercising the discretion to award costs. However, the appeal is
resisted on the bases that:
(a) the error was not material; and
(b) upon a re-exercise of the discretion by this Court, the result would
be the same as that ordered by the Industrial Commissioner.”7
[9] For the reasons which follow, it is unnecessary to determine the consequences of that
concession.
[10] When the appeal came before me on 3 December 2025 for mention, I was advised
that Gold Coast Health had changed its position. It maintained its concession that
there was error, but consented to the appeal being allowed and an order made that
there be no order as to costs of the interim reinstatement application and no order as
to costs of the current appeal.
[11] Counsel for Gold Coast Health informed the court that the adoption of the new course
was a purely pragmatic decision without reference to the merits (apart from the
concessions of error). In the litigation between Gold Coast Health and Dr Chen,
various allegations have been made by Dr Chen against Gold Coast Health and
various individuals. Counsel informed the court that by conceding the appeal it ought
not to be taken to be making any concessions in relation to those allegations. Counsel
submitted that the basis of the concession ought to be recorded. I accept that
submission and have hereby recorded counsel’s submissions.
[12] It is appropriate to make orders allowing the appeal, setting aside the order below and
making an order that there be no order as to costs of the interim reinstatement
application or this appeal.
[13] I make the following orders:
1. The appeal is allowed.
2. The order made on 9 August 2023 by the Queensland Industrial Relations
Commission is set aside.
3. There be no order as to costs of the appellant’s application for interlocutory
reinstatement.
4. There be no order as to costs of the appeal.
7 Chen v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service [2025] ICQ 017 at [12].
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/ICQ/2025/029