Director of Proceedings on behalf of the Health Ombudsman v XD [No 2] [2024] QCA 258
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Director of Proceedings on behalf of the Health Ombudsman
v XD [No 2] [2024] QCA 258
PARTIES: DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF THE
HEALTH OMBUDSMAN
(applicant)
v
XD
(respondent)
FILE NO/S: Appeal No 12814 of 2023
QCAT No 121 of 2020
QCAT No 288 of 2021
DIVISION: Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING: Application for Leave Queensland Civil and Administrative
Tribunal Act – Further Order
ORIGINATING
COURT:
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal – [2023]
QCAT 340 (Judicial Member Dick SC)
DELIVERED ON: 17 December 2024
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARING DATE: On the papers
JUDGES: Dalton JA and Fraser AJA and Brown J
ORDER: No order as to costs.
CATCHWORDS: PROCEDURE – CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND
TERRITORY COURTS – COSTS – where the appellant had
mixed success in the substantive appeal – where, as a result,
the parties agreed in their written submissions that there should
be no order as to costs – whether the court should make no
order as to costs
COUNSEL: J R Hunter KC, with S J Cartledge, for the applicant
G W Diehm KC, with C D Templeton, for the respondent
SOLICITORS: Office of the Health Ombudsman for the applicant
K&L Gates for the respondent
[1] THE COURT: The Court delivered its judgment in the appeal in this matter on
8 November 2024. In relation to costs, the Court ordered:
“5. If the parties intend that there should be any costs order other
than that costs follow the event, they should file written
submissions on costs not exceeding five pages, the respondent
within seven days of the date of delivery of this judgment, and
the appellant within seven days thereafter.
6. Otherwise, costs follow the event.”
-- 1 of 2 --
2
[2] Both parties provided short written submissions as to costs. The respondent
submitted that there should be no order as to costs. The appellant agreed that there
should be no order as to costs. In light of the parties’ position, it is therefore
appropriate that the Court make no order as to costs.
[3] The order of the Court is that there be no order as to costs.
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCA/2024/258