Cousland v Tropic Landscapes Pty Ltd t/as Sovereign Landscapes [2020] QCAT 449
QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION: Cousland v Tropic Landscapes Pty Ltd t/as Sovereign
Landscapes [2020] QCAT 449
PARTIES: ROBERT WILLIAM COUSLAND
(applicant)
v
TROPIC LANDSCAPES PTY LTD T/AS
SOVEREIGN LANDSCAPES
(respondent)
APPLICATION NO/S: BDL 211-19
MATTER TYPE: Building matters
DELIVERED ON: 10 November 2020
HEARING DATE: On the papers
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Member Paratz AM
ORDERS: Tropic Landscapes Pty Ltd trading as Sovereign
Landscapes is to pay the amount of twelve thousand
and fifty-eight dollars and sixty-five cents ($12,058.65)
to Robert William Cousland.
CATCHWORDS: CONTRACTS – BUILDING, ENGINEERING AND
RELATED CONTRACTS – PERFORMANCE OF
WORKS – REMEDIES FOR BREACH – DAMAGES –
where a landscaper failed to complete works and to
remedy defects – where the landscaper made no response
to the claims – where the claims were assessed – where
costs were allowed for disadvantaging the other party
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009
(Qld), s 100, s 102
REPRESENTATION:
Applicant: Self-represented
Respondent: No appearance
APPEARANCES: This matter was heard and determined on the papers
pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and
Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)
-- 1 of 6 --
2
REASONS FOR DECISION
[1] Robert and Lori Cousland entered into two contracts for landscaping works to be
conducted by Tropic Landscapes Pty Ltd (the landscaper).
[2] Mr Robert William Cousland, on behalf of the owners (the owners), filed an
Application for domestic building works in the Tribunal on 9 August 2019, seeking
an award for damages in the amount of $11,689.85 plus interest and costs.
[3] The owners say that Contract 1 was dated 27 June 2019, in relation to a retaining wall
and Colorbond fence, and involved some shared components of work with
neighbours.
[4] The application claims $1,731.64 in relation to Contract 1 as follows:
Incomplete works $ 958.34
Defective works $ 773.30
Contract 1 claim $1,731.64
[5] Contract 2 was dated 20 July 2018. The contract price was $44,708.00. The owners,
by their solicitors, gave notice terminating Contract 2 on 12 April 2019. The letter
from their solicitors noted as follows:1
Our clients entered into landscape contract dated 20 July 2018 to complete
landscaping works with practical completion for 31 October 2018. The practical
completion date was moved to end of December 2018. We are instructed that
your company has failed to complete tiling (87m2) and concrete work (5m2) as
per contract. In fact your company has failed to return to work since 27
November 2018 and has been in substantial breach of contract.
[6] The application claims $9,958.21 in relation to Contract 2 as follows:
Incomplete works $11,575.20
Defective works $ 2,583.81
Contract 2 claim $ 9,958.21
[7] The owners seek damages in relation to the two contracts. The total claim for Contract
1 and Contract 2 is $11,689.85.
[8] The owners say that the total contract amount was $66,988.60, and that total payments
were made of $62,517.80, leaving an amount owing of the contract price of $4,470.80.
Directions have been made in relation to the matter on 26 August 2019, 5 November
2019 and 23 January 2020. The directions variously required the landscaper to file a
Response to the application, a Response to a table prepared by the owners as to their
claim, to attend a Compulsory Conference, and to file Statements of Evidence.
[10] The landscaper has not filed any material in the proceedings in relation to the
Directions, or otherwise; and failed to attend the Compulsory Conference on 5
November 2019, or to provide any explanation for failing to do so.
[11] The landscaper has not responded to the owners’ claims.
1 Letter Narayan Lawyers to Tropic Landscapes Pty Ltd, 12 April 2019.
-- 2 of 6 --
3
[12] I gave directions on 23 January 2020 for the application to be determined on the
papers.
[13] These are the Reasons in determination of the application.
[14] Not all items that are referred to in the Application are the subject of a claim. I will
assess and decide on each item in respect of which a claim is made. Where I consider
that the claim is supported by evidence, and is reasonable, I will allow the claim.
[15] Any amounts for works that are within the contract price which have been paid for
and which have not been performed, and the reasonable cost of rectification of any
defects in the work that has been performed, are recoverable as damages for breach
of contract.
Contract 1 – retaining wall and Colorbond fence
[16] The owners say in the application that they have paid the contract price and variations
for Contract 1 of $17,277.60 in full.
Item 1
[17] This item is in relation to a missing Colorbond gate between the side walkway and
new retaining wall at the front side of the house.
[18] The claim is to supply and erect a 1.8 m high fitting single gate (1 m wide) with D-
latch in Coloursmart – Ironstone.
[19] A quote has been obtained from Fences R Us for $958.34. The quote is not challenged,
and I allow that amount.
Item 2
This item is a defect in relation to a leaning fence/poor concrete footings located at
the last 15 m at rear of the property.
The claim is to straighten and re-concrete for Colorbond posts.
A quote has been obtained from Fences R Us for $386.10. The quote is not challenged,
and I allow that amount.
Item 3
[23] This item is a defect in relation to an incorrectly oriented and sized Colorbond fence
panel which is 15 m from the rear boundary.
[24] The claim is for $387.20 to replace the incorrectly fitted Colorbond panel. The quote
is not challenged, and I allow that amount.
Total allowed for Contract 1
Item 1 $958.34
Item 2 $386.10
Item 3 $387.20
Total allowed for Contract 1 $1,731.64
-- 3 of 6 --
4
Contract 2 – concreting/tiling/pool fencing/stormwater
The owners say in the application that the grand total for the contract price and
variations of contract is $49,711.00 and that they have paid $45,240.20, leaving an
outstanding balance of $4,470.80.
Item 5
This item is in relation to completion of 87 m 2 of tiling work that was not performed.
The claim is for $11,463.00, being a quote obtained from Evolution Tile and Stone
dated 13 April 2019. Other quotes were obtained from PERC tiling for $11,814, and
from Dejan Ocvirk for $13,560.
None of the quotes is challenged, and I allow the lower quote from Evolution Tile and
Stone in the amount of $11,463.00.
Item 6
This item is for 20 missing glass pool fence panel spigot covers.
A quote has been supplied from Oxworks for $112.20. The quote is not challenged,
and I allow that amount.
Item 11
This item is a back-charge for repair of an exposed water main that was left above the
surface at the front of the property.
The application states that the connection was severed by the landscaper at a depth of
30 to 40 cm, and was partially repaired during the stormwater installation on 6
November 2018.
The claim is for rectification by digging into the required depth so the water main
could be buried.
A quote has been obtained from Fallon Solutions for $232.51. The quote is not
challenged, and I allow that amount.
Item 12
This item is in relation to a black aluminium pool fence panel which was not raked as
specified.
The claim is to remove and replace one panel of 1.2 m black flattop pool fencing with
a 1.6 m long rake of 220 mm custom panel.
A quote has been obtained from Fences R Us for $459.80. The quote is not challenged,
and I allow that amount.
Item 13
This item is in relation to alfresco garden beds with excessive fill which were not
levelled.
The claim is to move the excessive fill to behind a retaining wall near the filtration
equipment.
A quote has been obtained from Tropiscapes for $2,161.50. The quote is not
challenged, and I allow that amount.
-- 4 of 6 --
5
Total items allowed for Contract 2
Item 5 $11,463.00
Item 6 $112.20
Item 11 $232.51
Item 12 $459.80
Item 13 $2,161.50
Total items allowed for Contract 2 $14,429.01
The total of items allowed for Contract 2 is $14,429.01. As an amount of $4,470.80 is
still owing in respect of the contract, that amount is to be subtracted from the items
allowed, giving an amount of $9,958.21.
The total claim allowed is $11,689.85 as set out below:
Contract 1 claim $1,731.64
Contract 2 claim $9,958.21
Total claim allowed $11,689.85
Interest
The owners make a claim for interest in their Application.
No amount, or basis for an award of interest, is specified in the application. The only
reference is in clause 9 of Part C of the Application which says:
Additionally the owner wishes to claim any interest payable on these amounts
deemed applicable by the tribunal.
In the absence of any applicable provision in a contract, or a claim giving notice to
the landscaper of the extent of any interest claimed, or the basis upon which interest
is claimed, in the Application, to which the landscaper could respond, no amount for
interest can fairly be allowed.
I do not allow any amount for interest.
Costs
The owners make a claim in clause 9 of Part C of the Application for costs.
Section 100 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)
provides that each party usually bears their own costs. Section 102 provides that the
tribunal may make an order for costs if it considers the interests of justice require it to
make the order. Section 102(3)(a) provides that the tribunal may have regard to
whether a party unnecessarily disadvantages another party to the proceeding.
The landscaper has not responded to the claim in any way, and has put the owners to
the expense of pursuing their claim to a decision. That conduct of the landscaper has
unnecessarily disadvantaged the owners.
The owners have incurred a filing fee in the Tribunal of $368.80. No other costs have
been identified.
I allow costs to the owners of $368.80.
-- 5 of 6 --
6
Conclusion
I am satisfied that the claim by Robert William Cousland in the full amount of
$11,689.85 is substantiated.
I allow costs in the amount of $368.80.
The total award is $12,058.65.
I order that Tropic Landscapes Pty Ltd trading as Sovereign Landscapes pay the
amount of $12,058.65 to Robert William Cousland.
-- 6 of 6 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCAT/2020/449