ACP Properties (Townsville) Pty Ltd v 11 Oonoonba Road Pty Ltd & Anor [2019] QDC 265
DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: ACP Properties (Townsville) Pty Ltd v 11 Oonoonba Road
Pty Ltd & Anor [2019] QDC 265
PARTIES: ACP PROPERTIES (TOWNSVILLE) PTY LTD (ACN
631 282 293)
(Plaintiff / Applicant)
v
11 OONOONBA ROAD PTY LTD (ACN 615 776 148)
(First Defendant / Respondent)
and
TIMOTHY EDMONDS
(Second Defendant)
and
STEPHEN GEORGE CAMPBELL
(First Third Party)
and
A.C.P. PROPERTIES (QLD) PTY LTD (ACN 606 370
870) AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CAMPBELL PROPERTY
TRUST NO. 2
(Second Third Party)
FILE NO/S: BD2476/19
DIVISION: Civil
PROCEEDING: Chamber application
ORIGINATING
COURT: Brisbane District Court
DELIVERED ON: 5 December 2019
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARING DATE: 18 October 2019
JUDGE: Richards DCJ
ORDER: Application dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT –
PROPERTY – MORTGAGE – where the plaintiff and
second third party companies are directed by the first third
party – where the defendant alleges the second mortgage was
fraudulently signed and registered by the second third party
without their knowledge or consent – where the first ranking
mortgage was paid out by and assigned to the plaintiff –
-- 1 of 4 --
2
where the second third party exercising power of sale as
mortgagee transferred the property to the plaintiff – whether
the defendant has prospects of success in this claim – whether
this application is premature pending resolution of other
issues arising in this matter at trial
COUNSEL: N H Ferrett QC for the plaintiff
L Copley for the first and second defendant
SOLICITORS: Archibald and Brown Lawyers for the plaintiff
Mobbs and Marr Legal for the first and second defendants
[1] On 23 December 2016 ACP Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd and 11 Oonoonba Road Pty Ltd
completed the purchase of the Townsville Transit Centre. They entered into a joint
venture agreement to facilitate the purchase and development of the property. The
agreement provided that Mr Campbell, the director of ACP Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd
would lend Mr Edmonds, the director of 11 Oonoonba Road Pty Ltd, $1,350,000 to
pay for his share of the property and $297,500 to complete some work on the property.
It was agreed that to secure the loans, ACP Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd would take a first
registered mortgage on the property. That mortgage was registered on 3 April 2017.
The loan was initially to be repaid by 23 December 2017 but was later extended to 23
December 2018.
[2] Mr Edmonds was unable to obtain finance to repay the loan so it was agreed to
approach the NAB to obtain finance to refurbish the property. On 11 April 2018,
NAB approved and issued loan documents for a facility for $1.6 million. The loan
was provided to both companies with personal guarantees from Mr Edmonds and Mr
Campbell. NAB would only agree to the facility if it held the first ranking registered
mortgage on the property so the initial mortgage was released on 20 June 2018.
[3] On 23 August 2018, ACP Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd registered a duplicate copy of the
initial mortgage as a second mortgage. It was registered by in-house counsel for ACP
Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd, Miss Reynolds. It is alleged that this second mortgage was
registered without Mr Edmonds’ knowledge or consent.
[4] On 3 December 2018, ACP Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd issued three notices of exercise
of power of sale citing various defaults on the second mortgage. On 5 December
2018 the solicitors acting for the defendant wrote to solicitors acting for ACP
Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd indicating that the second mortgage on the property had been
improperly registered and to withdraw any purported exercise of power of sale.1 The
registration of the second mortgage from an early stage was very much in dispute.
[5] NAB entered into a deed of assignment of the NAB facilities to ACP Properties
(Townsville) Pty Ltd in February of 2019. The assignment was said to have taken
place upon payment of the debt as defined in the deed to be $460,210.70. On 9 May
1 Affidavit of Kendall Bocos ex KKB4
-- 2 of 4 --
3
2019 ACP Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd in its own right and as mortgagee exercising
power of sale under the second mortgage signed a transfer document transferring the
property to ACP Properties (Townsville) Pty Ltd for the sum of $2,730,000. That
transfer was registered on 31 May 2019. None of the sale proceeds that were received
by ACP Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd were used to discharge the first ranking mortgage.
None of the funds were retained by the purchaser to discharge their first ranking
mortgage.
[6] Stephen Campbell is the sole director and secretary of ACP Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd,
ACP properties (Townsville) Pty Ltd and ACP Holdings Pty Ltd.
[7] The plaintiff submits the actions of ACP Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd do not affect the
liability of the defendants in relation to the assigned mortgage from the National
Australia Bank. Whether the proceeds of the sale of the property was applied
incorrectly and whether the second mortgage was registered without authority is a
matter of dispute between the defendants, Campbell and ACP Properties (Qld) Pty
Ltd.
[8] The defendant argues that firstly, the plaintiff paid out the debt to the National
Australia Bank rather than taking an assignment of the debt because the property was
transferred to it before the assignment took place. This argument depends on an
argument that title to the property passed to the plaintiff on 9 May 2019 when the
transfer documents indicate that the payment was made. There is material before me
that indicates the date that payment was exchanged between the plaintiff and the
second third party in the form of a settlement statement was 30 May 2019 when the
transfer was registered however, given the close relationship of the companies
involved in the transaction, the allegations of fraud and the fact that this document
was signed by the sole director of both companies, it does not carry as much weight
as it might otherwise. No doubt bank statements will resolve any uncertainty in this
regard.
[9] Secondly, the defendants claim that the second mortgage upon which the foreclosure
was made was fraudulently registered. The registration of the mortgage was effected
by Ms Reynolds, presumably acting on the direction of Mr Campbell. Mr Campbell
and ACP Properties (Qld) Pty Ltd have been joined as third parties to the action, but
they have not as yet filed defences. Essentially the defendants say the application is
premature, because given the close relationship between the plaintiff and the third
parties, it may be that the fraud allegations become relevant to the case against the
plaintiff as well.
[10] Thirdly, it is argued for the second defendant Mr Edmonds that the personal guarantee
given by him for the loan was signed implicit in the knowledge that there was a first
registered mortgage over the property which easily covered the value of the property.
It is submitted that the guarantee was voided by the actions of the assigned mortgagor
who, bought the property in full knowledge of the first mortgage that it held but then
did not press its rights over the vendor in circumstances where the vendor had full
-- 3 of 4 --
4
knowledge of the first registered mortgage and the allegations of fraud in relation to
the second mortgage.
[11] In this case, while the plaintiff is a different entity to the first and second third parties,
it cannot be ignored that the companies are related and that the sole director of both
companies is the first third party. Neither can it be ignored that the plaintiff subverted
its own rights under the first registered mortgage to pay the second third party the full
sum of the purchase price agreed. Whilst it is by no means certain, there is an arguable
case that the ownership of the property may have passed before the assignment of the
lease. It may also transpire that the fraud allegations may bear on the legitimacy of
the claim of the plaintiff.
[12] In my view, having regard to the matters raised by the defendants, that at the very
least this application is premature. The application is dismissed.
-- 4 of 4 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2019/265