FT [2015] QCAT 321
CITATION: FT [2015] QCAT 321
PARTIES: FT
APPLICATION NUMBER: GAA4470-15
MATTER TYPE: Guardianship and administration matters for
adults
HEARING DATE: On the papers
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Senior Member Endicott
DELIVERED ON: 1 July 2015
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE: SY must send to The Public Trustee of
Queensland a full and unredacted copy of the
Will of FT dated 16 April 2009 by 4:00pm on
10 July 2015.
CATCHWORDS: GUARDIANSHIP – where administrator
appointed for all financial matters of adult –
where attorney in place to make personal and
health care decisions – where request made by
administrator for a copy of the Will of the adult –
where request refused by attorney
DIRECTION – where direction sought by
administrator for attorney to provide copy of Will
– whether information required for informed
exercise of administrator’s power – whether any
reasonable excuse for refusal
Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld)
ss 44, 44(2), 44(3), 44(5) and 44(6)
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) (QCAT Act).
REASONS FOR DECISION
-- 1 of 4 --
2
[1] FT is 88 years of age. The Public Trustee of Queensland has been
appointed as his administrator for all financial matters. His daughter, SY, is
his attorney for personal and health matters.
[2] FT and SY are registered owners as tenants in common of land situated at
Stanton Road, Neurum.
[3] FT made a will in 2009. The administrator made a request to SY in June
2014 for a copy of FT’s will. SY refused to accede to that request. However
more recently she has provided a copy of what purports to be the will of FT
but with most of the wording on the will blocked out. The testamentary
intentions of FT cannot be ascertained by reading the document provided
by SY.
[4] The administrator applied to QCAT for a direction that SY provides a copy
of FT’s will to the administrator. SY has responded to that application in the
following terms: Without full disclosure as to why you want the Will of FT, I
am only supplying you with proof that a Will exists. That is all that you
should require.
[5] This response did not satisfy the request made by the administrator and
The Public Trustee seeks an appropriate direction from the tribunal.
[6] The Public Trustee submitted that SY appears to object to the release of a
copy of the Will as she is not satisfied that possession of a copy of the Will
is necessary for the Public Trustee to make an informed exercise of his
power as administrator for all financial matters for FT.
[7] However, section 44 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld)
provides an administrator with an entitlement to possess all information
which is necessary to make an informed exercise of the administrator’s
power. A person who has custody or control of information must give that
information to the administrator unless the person has a reasonable
excuse.1 If a person does not comply with the request made by the
administrator, the tribunal may order the person to give the information to
the administrator.2
[8] The Public Trustee has submitted that an administrator is not required to
provide a person, who has information about an adult who is subject to an
administration appointment, with full disclosure of the motive behind a
request for information under section 44 of the Act. It was submitted that in
some circumstances the motive may be confidential or privileged to the
adult.
[9] I accept those submissions and find that The Public Trustee was not
required to satisfy SY of the appropriateness of his reasons for the request
when the request was first made for a copy of the Will of FT. SY could only
1 Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld) s 44(2).
2 Ibid s 44(3).
-- 2 of 4 --
3
refuse the request if she had a reasonable excuse for that refusal. Full
disclosure by The Public Trustee of the reason why the Will is sought was
not a prerequisite for SY formulating a reasonable excuse for refusing to
comply with the request for a copy of the Will. Full disclosure would have
probably assisted SY in formulating her response to the request but it was
not a pre-condition to her decision.
[10] However when a direction is sought under s 44(3) of the Act, the tribunal
should be satisfied whether it is appropriate for the administrator to have
possession of the requested information in order to make an informed
exercise of decision-making power by the administrator. The Public Trustee
has submitted that he has no reason to attempt to defeat the testamentary
intentions of FT. The Public Trustee does express concerns however that
he has been compelled to make decisions without the benefit of referring to
FT’s will.
[11] In particular, The Public Trustee in August 2014 made a decision to sever
the joint tenancy of the property at Stanton Road, Neurum. It is reasonably
likely that the administrator may need to make further decisions about the
real property interests of FT in his role as decision-maker for all financial
matters for FT.
[12] The Public Trustee submitted that his overriding concern must be the proper
care and protection of FT in his lifetime. To exercise that care, an
administrator will necessarily have regard to the succession plan for his
estate that has been instigated by FT in his Will. It was submitted that it is
consistent with the General Principles and with decided legal authority, that
a substitute decision-maker must have regard to an adult’s competent
testamentary intentions.
[13] I accept those submissions. I find that The Public Trustee should have
regard to the testamentary intentions of FT when exercising financial
decision-making power for him. I am satisfied that it is entirely appropriate
for a copy of the Will of FT to be provided to The Public Trustee so decisions
are not made that inadvertently frustrate the testamentary intentions of FT.
In particular, ongoing decisions about the real property interests of FT
should be made with regard to his overall testamentary intentions.
[14] I am satisfied that I should make an order under section 44(3) requiring SY
to provide a full and unredacted copy of the Will of FT to The Public Trustee.
Under section 44(4), SY must comply with such a direction unless she has
a reasonable excuse. SY was given by my directions made on 3 June 2015
an opportunity to disclose any reasonable excuse. She did not file any
response in the tribunal.
[15] SY did however send to The Public Trustee a response as outlined in
paragraph 4 of these reasons. The Public Trustee has submitted that her
response does not disclose any reasonable excuse. I agree. It is not a
reasonable excuse for SY to continue to refuse to provide a copy of the Will
because she has not been told why the request was made. The Public
-- 3 of 4 --
4
Trustee has a right to a copy of the Will in order to make an informed
exercise of his powers as an administrator.
[16] The Act itself sets out a statutory basis for an excuse in s 44(5), namely to
avoid self incrimination. Release by SY of a copy of the Will to The Public
Trustee will not expose her to any breach of her lawful duties as an attorney
given the provisions in section 44(6) which override any restriction about
disclosure of the information in any other Act or at common law. I accept
the submissions of The Public Trustee that there is no legal objection
against disclosure of the copy of the Will arising out of the duties of SY as
a fiduciary for FT.
[17] I therefore direct that SY must send to The Public Trustee of Queensland a
full and unredacted copy of the Will of FT dated 16 April 2009 by 4:00pm on
10 July 2015.
-- 4 of 4 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCAT/2015/321