Blocker v Vlahogenis [2015] QCAT 239
CITATION: Blocker v Vlahogenis [2015] QCAT 239
PARTIES: Dan Blocker
(Applicant/Appellant)
v
Maria Vlahogenis
(Respondent)
APPLICATION NUMBER: OCL027-15
MATTER TYPE: Other civil dispute matters
HEARING DATE: On the papers
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Judge Horneman-Wren SC, Acting President
DELIVERED ON: 23 June 2015
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE: 1. The application for a finding of contempt
is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL –PROCEDURE –
QUEENSLAND – OTHER MATTERS –MINOR
CIVIL DISPUTES – where applicant applied to
the Tribunal to make a finding of contempt
relating to affidavit material before Adjudicator
acting under Body Corporate and Community
Management Act 1997 – whether Tribunal
should make a finding of contempt – where
affidavit not filed in the Tribunal – where
application misconceived
Body Corporate and Community Management
Act 1997 (Qld)
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal
Act 2009 (Qld) s 47, s 218, s 219
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) (QCAT Act).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
REASONS FOR DECISION
[1] On 30 March 2015 an Adjudicator acting under the Body Corporate and
Community Management Act 1997 (Qld) published an order and her
reasons in resolution of a dispute under that Act. The applicant in these
proceedings, Dan Blocker, has appealed that order to the Tribunal under
Chapter 6, Part 11 of the BCCM Act. Separately, Mr Blocker filed, on 30
April 2015, what purports to be a contempt application. The alleged
contempt relates to an affidavit sworn in the dispute proceedings before
the Adjudicator.
[2] The contempt application is misconceived. Section 219 of the
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) permits a
Judicial Member of the Tribunal to punish a person in contempt of the
Tribunal. In doing so, the Tribunal has all the protection, powers,
jurisdiction and authority which the Supreme Court has, for that Court, in
relation to contempt.1 The circumstances in which a person may be in
contempt of the Tribunal are set out in s 218(1) of the QCAT Act.
[3] If there has been any contempt, a matter in respect of which I express no
view, it is not of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The
affidavit was not filed in proceedings in the Tribunal.
[4] Because the application is misconceived, it ought be dismissed pursuant
to s 47 of the QCAT Act.
1 Section 219(1).
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCAT/2015/239