Application for Declarations in relation to s 691C of the Industrial Relations Act 1999 [2014] QIRC 115
QUEENSLAND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
CITATION: Re: Application for Declarations in relation to
s 691C of the Industrial Relations Act 1999
[2014] QIRC 115
PARTIES: Queensland Urban Utilities
The Electrical Trades Union of Employees,
Queensland
Automotive, Metals, Engineering, Printing and
Kindred Industries Industrial Union of
Employees
Queensland Construction, Forestry, Mining &
Energy, Industrial Union of Employees
Plumbers and Gasfitters Employees Union
Queensland, Union of Employees
Queensland Services, Industrial Union of
Employees
The Association of Professional Engineers,
Scientists and Managers, Australia, Queensland
Branch, Union of Employees
The Australian Workers Union of Employees,
Queensland
Together Queensland, Industrial Union of
Employees
Queensland Council of Unions
CASE NO: B/2014/31
PROCEEDING: Application for Declarations
DELIVERED ON: 23 July 2014
HEARING DATE: 23 July 2014
MEMBER: Deputy President O'Connor
Deputy President Kaufman
Commissioner Neate
-- 1 of 6 --
2
ORDERS : We make the following declarations:
that the preamble to cl.7.3, to the extent
that it commits QUU to no forced
redundancies is of no effect;
that the words: If the employee does not
accept a voluntary redundancy offer, then
the employee will be placed in any role in
accordance with this Agreement, subject to
the provisions for income maintenance"
appearing at the end of cl.7.3.2 are of no
effect;
that cll.7.3.2, 7.3.3, 7.3.4 and 7.3.5 do not
apply in circumstances where QUU
proposes to forcibly retrench an
employees;
that QUU is entitled to forcibly retrench
employees;
that in the event of forced retrenchment
by QUU, employees covered by the
agreement are entitled to notice and
redundancy pay as provided by:
1. Notice in accordance with Part 3 of
Chapter 3 of the Industrial
Relations Act 1999; and
2. Redundancy pay in accordance
with Part 4 Division 1AA of
Chapter 3 of the Industrial
Relations Act 1999.
CATCHWORDS: INDUSTRIAL LAW - APPLICATION FOR
DECLARATIONS - forced redundancy -
employment security provision - organisational
change provision - whether the provision preventing
forced redundancy is of no effect
CASES: Industrial Relations Act 1999 s 274A, s 691C,
s 691C(1)(b), s 691C(1)(c), s 691C(2)
APPEARANCES: Mr J. Wells, of Allens Linklaters Lawyers for
Queensland Urban Utilities
Mr N. Henderson, for Queensland Services,
Industrial Union of Employees, The Electrical
Trades Union of Employees, Queensland Council of
Unions, Automotive, Metals, Engineering, Printing
and Kindred Industries Industrial Union of
Employees, Construction, Forestry, Mining &
Energy, Industrial Union of Employees, The
-- 2 of 6 --
3
Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and
Managers, Australia, Queensland Branch, Union of
Employees
Mr B. Watson, Australian Workers Union
Reasons for Decision
[1] Queensland Urban Utilities ("QUU") has applied pursuant to s.274A of the
Industrial Relations Act 1999 ("the Act") for declarations seeking to have parts of
cl.7.3 of the Queensland Urban Utilities (QUU) Certified Agreement 2011 declared
of no effect. It seeks:
A declaration that the preamble to clause 7.3 of the Queensland Urban
Utilities (QUU) Certified Agreement 2011, which commits Queensland
Urban Utilities to 'no forced redundancies' is of no effect as a provision
prescribed by section 691C of the Industrial Relations Act 1999;
A declaration that Queensland Urban Utilities may forcibly retrench an
employee;
A declaration that clauses 7.3.2, 7.3.3, 7.3.4, and 7.3.5 of the
Queensland Urban Utilities (QUU) Certified Agreement 2011 do not
apply in circumstances where Queensland Urban Utilities proposes to
forcibly retrench an employee;
Alternatively to the declaration sought in Para 3 above, a declaration that
clauses 7.3.2, 7.3.3, 7.3.4, and 7.3.5 of the Queensland Urban Utilities
(QUU) – Certified Agreement 2011 are of no effect as provisions
prescribed by s 691C of the Industrial Relations Act 1999;
A declaration that, in the event of forced retrenchment by Queensland
Urban Utilities, employees covered by the Queensland Urban Utilities
(QUU) – Certified Agreement 2011 are entitled to:
1. Notice in accordance with Part 3 of Chapter 3 of the
Industrial Relations Act 1999; and
2. Redundancy pay in accordance with Part 4 Division 1AA of
Chapter 3 of the Industrial Relations Act 1999.
[2] The application is made on the basis that cl.7.3, or at least parts of it, is an
employment security provision within s.691C(1)(b) of the Act or, alternatively an
organisational change provision within s.691C(1)(c) and are therefore of no effect.
[3] Cl.7 deals with Organisational Change and cl.7.1 is headed "Organisational change
process". Cl.7.2 deals with retraining and placement.
[4] Cl.7.3 is headed "Redundancy" and its preamble reads:
"7.3 Redundancy
QUU is committed to supporting employees who are affected by
organisational change. QUU prefers to retrain and place employees
made surplus to requirements into the areas where they can continue to
provide value for money and make a positive contribution. In order to
-- 3 of 6 --
4
support this preference, QUU commits to no forced retrenchments
during the life of this Agreement."
This procedure provides options to manage situations in which these
aims may not be achievable or may prove unsuccessful, and/or may not
be desired by the employees involved.
This procedure demonstrates respect for people by assisting QUU
employees who are affected by technological or organisational change to
leave the organisation in a fair and reasonable manner.
This process applies only to permanent employees.
…
Voluntary redundancy may apply where an employee has become
surplus to requirements as a result of new technologies being introduced
and/or changes to business or operational requirements, and does not
have required skills or capabilities or the capacity to retrain within a
reasonable time."
[5] Put simply, QUU contends that the words: "QUU commits to no forced retrenchment
…" mean what they say. They prevent QUU making any of its employees covered
by the agreement redundant against the will of the employee concerned.
[6] We accept that a provision in a certified agreement that prevents an employer from
retrenching an employee against the employees will is an employment security
provision within the meaning of that expression as defined in s 691C(2).
[7] For the unions opposing the application it was put that, read contextually, there is no
prohibition against QUU compulsorily retrenching an employee once the processes
set out in the clause have been exhausted.
[8] They point to the second paragraph in the preamble and its reference to the
procedure providing options "to manage situations in which these aims may not be
achievable or may prove unsuccessful, and/or may not be desired by the employees
involved."
[9] We do not accept that the aims extend beyond retraining and placing employees in
other areas of QUU. In particular, we reject the unions' submission that QUU's
commitment to no forced retrenchments is an aim. Clause 7.3.2 makes it clear
beyond doubt that if QUU does not offer, or an employee does not accept, voluntary
retrenchment that the employee will be placed elsewhere in the organisation and his
or her income will be maintained.
[10] The remainder of cl.7.3 deals with how voluntary redundancies are to be
implemented and the processes associated therewith. A perusal of the headings
demonstrates that.
[11] The entire structure of cl.7.3 presupposes that the only form of retrenchment that can
occur is of a voluntary nature. It does not leave open the compulsory retrenchment
-- 4 of 6 --
5
of employees. In our opinion cl.7.3 covers the field on the topic of retrenchment. In
the context of the agreement as a whole, and particularly cl.7, the express conferral
of the right to offer voluntary redundancies, excludes the right to forcibly retrench
employees. There is no scope for QUU to implement forced retrenchments.
[12] However, QUU's primary submission is that we make a declaration that the
preamble to cl.7.3, to the extent that it commits QUU to no forced redundancies is of
no effect and that cll.7.3.2, 7.3.3, 7.3.4 and 7.3.5 do not apply in circumstances
where QUU proposes to forcibly retrench an employees. QUU also seeks a
declaration that that it is entitled to forcibly retrench employees.
[13] Its alternative submission is that the abovementioned clauses be declared to be of no
effect.
[14] It also seeks a declaration that in the event of forced retrenchment by QUU,
employees covered by the agreement are entitled to notice and redundancy pay as
provided by the Act.
[15] Given that cl 7.3.3 deals comprehensively with voluntary redundancy we are
disinclined to interfere with the agreement reached by the parties any further than is
absolutely necessary.
[16] This end could be achieved by the making of declarations as set out in [13] above. It
would also be necessary to declare that the words: "If the employee does not accept
a voluntary redundancy offer, then the employee will be placed in any role in
accordance with this Agreement, subject to the provisions for income maintenance"
appearing at the end of cl.7.3.2 are of no effect.
[17] QUU submitted that the requirement that up to six months may elapse after an
employee is offered retraining and placement, before the employee must be offered
voluntary redundancy, is also an employment security provision and thus of no
effect. We disagree. QUU does not submit that the voluntary redundancy process is
of no effect. That it has agreed to a process that takes some months does not render
that process an employment security provision. It is not a provision about job
security.
[18] Having regard to our conclusions it is not necessary to consider whether any parts of
cl.7 are an organisational change provision and of no effect for that reason. Having
regard to the definition of that expression in s 691C(2) of the Act, we doubt that any
part of cl.7 offends the Act.
[19] We make the following declarations:
that the preamble to cl.7.3, to the extent that it commits QUU to no forced
redundancies is of no effect;
that the words: If the employee does not accept a voluntary redundancy
offer, then the employee will be placed in any role in accordance with this
Agreement, subject to the provisions for income maintenance" appearing at
the end of cl.7.3.2 are of no effect
that cll.7.3.2, 7.3.3, 7.3.4 and 7.3.5 do not apply in circumstances where
QUU proposes to forcibly retrench an employees;
-- 5 of 6 --
6
that QUU is entitled to forcibly retrench employees;
that in the event of forced retrenchment by QUU, employees covered by
the agreement are entitled to notice and redundancy pay as provided by:
1. Notice in accordance with Part 3 of Chapter 3 of the Industrial
Relations Act 1999; and
2. Redundancy pay in accordance with Part 4 Division 1AA of
Chapter 3 of the Industrial Relations Act 1999.
-- 6 of 6 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QIRC/2014/115