Ansen v Sameiro Pty Ltd & Ors [2013] QDC 22
1
[2013] QDC 22
DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE ROBIN QC
No 3226 of 2008
RENE HENDRICUS GERARDUS ANSEN
and
BRENDA KAY ANSEN
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
and
SAMEIRO PTY LTD (ACN 110 560 051) Defendant
and
SAMEIRO BUSINESS TRUST Trust
BRISBANE
..DATE 31/01/2013
ORDER
CATCHWORDS
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules - r56
Proposed consent orders for payment of moneys in court made
subject to the filing of an affidavit regarding entitlements
on claims by others.
-- 1 of 3 --
2 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
HIS HONOUR: There is an application proposed to be heard
about an oral hearing before the court which deals with the
disposition of funds paid into Court some time ago. Those
were approximately $100,000, described as retention moneys
held after the sale of a business. The defendant company is
now in receivership and liquidation. Those in control of it
have agreed with the plaintiffs upon an appropriate
disposition of the funds in court.
Mr Long's affidavit has as exhibits two counterparts of a deed
of settlement dated 12th December 2012, which has been
executed by all parties. The funds are to go to the
plaintiffs as to $60,000, otherwise to the liquidator of the
defendant. In the interim the parties are agreed the funds
ought to be transmitted by the Registrar to MSB Lawyers, who
are the liquidators' solicitors. That's the reason why the
draft order, which I've initialled, provides for payment out
of the moneys in court to the trust account of that firm.
The application is made under rule 561. Reference to
subrule (2) indicates that it has been overlooked; it was
appropriate to include in paragraph 1 of the order, at the
beginning of it, the following words: "Subject to the filing
of an affidavit of the liquidators of the defendant stating
awareness of a right or claim by another person to all or any
part of the notice."
The direction to release the moneys should obviously be
subject to such a condition.
-- 2 of 3 --
3 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
Order as per initialled draft.
-----
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2013/022