Andrews v Camnet Finance Pty Ltd [2013] QCAT 671
CITATION: Andrews v Camnet Finance Pty Ltd [2013]
QCAT 671
PARTIES: Scott Andrews
(Applicant)
v
Camnet Finance Pty Ltd
(Respondent)
APPLICATION NUMBER: MCDO1306-13
MATTER TYPE: Other minor civil dispute matter
HEARING DATE: On the papers
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Adjudicator Bertelsen
DELIVERED ON: 21 August 2013
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE: 1. The application to dismiss this
proceeding is refused.
2. Both applicant and respondent are
granted leave to be legally represented at
mediation.
CATCHWORDS: Application – allegation of identical facts –
abuse of process – identification and clarity of
facts at mediation to determine continuity
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (QCAT Act).
REASONS FOR DECISION
[1] The respondent asserts that a local Court Downing Centre claim was
made by the respondent as plaintiff and the applicant as defendant; that
judgement was obtained on 31 October 2012 and that a bankruptcy notice
was issued on 7 December 2012.
[2] It appears the local Court action involved the same items and the same
facts and circumstances. The respondent asserts that this application is
-- 1 of 2 --
2
an abuse of process. Material produced by the respondent and furnished
to the applicant would suggest that this may be the case. An
unsuccessful attempt has been made to obtain a reply from the applicant.
[3] The respondent’s application for legal representation has been furnished
to the applicant. There has been no reply.
[4] An allegation of abuse of process is a serious matter. The respondent
should be allowed legal representation at mediation as should the
applicant. Mediation should proceed to allow the parties to place all facts
before each other before proceeding further. Mediation will serve the
useful purpose of resolving the application at that point or clarifying what
issues remain unresolved that may necessitate a hearing in due course.
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCAT/2013/671