Boyers v Coward [2013] QCAT 86
CITATION: Boyers v Coward [2013] QCAT 86
PARTIES: Jasmine Ida Boyers
v
Ryan Glynn Coward
APPLICATION NUMBER: MCDO2173-11
MATTER TYPE: Other minor civil dispute matters
HEARING DATE: On the papers
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Peta Stilgoe, Senior Member
DELIVERED ON: 21 February 2013
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE: 1. The application for the production of a
thing is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: MINOR CIVIL DISPUTE – where settlement
agreement – where application not re-list for
a hearing – where application refused –
where application for production of a thing –
where “thing” was amount due under
settlement
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
The tribunal heard and determined this matter on the papers pursuant to s 32 of
the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (QCAT Act).
REASONS FOR DECISION
[1] Ms Boyers and Mr Coward, driving separate cars, were involved in a car
accident. Ms Boyers applied to the Tribunal for an order that Mr Coward
pay the cost of the damage to her car.
[2] Sensibly, the parties settled the dispute at mediation. The agreement
provided that Mr Coward would pay Ms Boyers by instalments. They
agreed that, if either party defaulted under the agreement, the other could
apply for an order to give effect to the settlement.
[3] Mr Coward did default. Ms Boyers applied for an order that Mr Coward pay
her the balance. An Adjudicator dismissed her application.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
[4] Ms Boyers then applied for an order that Mr Coward produce a thing,
namely $4,628.00, the same amount as she had claimed in her earlier
application.
[5] Ms Boyers wants to enforce the settlement agreement by forcing
Mr Coward to produce the settlement sum to the Tribunal. The Tribunal
has no enforcement powers and it cannot acquire those powers by the
artificial means of an application to produce.
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCAT/2013/086