I AM THE LAW
Browse › Case law › Queensland

Burke v Hampton [2012] QDC 343

Case law · Queensland · 2012
1-1 [2012] QDC 343 DISTRICT COURT CIVIL JURISDICTION JUDGE ROBIN QC No 3153 of 2010 DOMINIC BURKE Plaintiff and WENDY HAMPTON and AQIS/MAFF Defendant BRISBANE ..DATE 31/10/2012 JUDGMENT CATCHWORDS Informal representations by the plaintiff following publication of court's reasons for striking out (fourth) statement of claim and staying the claim - court not dissuaded from making the orders foreshadowed. -- 1 of 2 -- 1-2 JUDGMENT 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 HIS HONOUR: For reasons published to the parties two weeks ago, the statement of claim of the plaintiff is struck out and the proceeding is stayed. The defendant is ordered to pay the applicant/defendant's costs of their application to be assessed on the standard basis. I ought to say that Mr Burke has sent a lengthy email to my associate for my attention. In essence, it refers to other matters involving the second defendant which Mr Burke appears to be alleging represent similar instances involving organs of the second defendant to those he complains of in this proceeding, presumably as a kind of corroboration of his claim in a last ditch attempt to persuade me not to stay it, but rather to let him have his day in court. The published reasons indicate that I'm not in any doubt about Mr Burke's genuineness, which is not to say he has a claim that deserves to succeed. The orders made today don't involve any assessment of the merits, but visit on him what seem to me inevitable consequences of serious deficiencies in his process. I've indicated the orders. ----- -- 2 of 2 --