Edgarange Pty Ltd v Pretirment Villages Pty Ltd [2012] QDC 319
1
[2012] QDC 319
DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE ROBIN QC
No 918 of 2011
EDGARANGE PTY LTD Plaintiff
and
PRETIREMENT VILLAGES PTY LTD Defendant
BRISBANE
..DATE 15/10/2012
ORDER
CATCHWORDS
Commercial List - uncontroversial listing - desirability of
fixing trial dates when listing occurs
-- 1 of 3 --
2 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
HIS HONOUR: Order as per initialled draft. The effect of
that draft is to place this proceeding in the commercial list.
This is not opposed by the defendant, but it does oppose the
fixing of trial dates. That's on the basis that the defendant
has in mind to join a third party, and that it would have the
appearance of being too precipitate in committing to a
timetable that may prejudice the third party.
These things are always flexible. My own notion of the way
the commercial list ought to work is that, prima facie, trial
dates ought to be allocated at the earliest possible stage so
that case management occurs with a view to meeting those
target dates. It seems to be a feature of the system that
unless dates are allocated well ahead the opportunity for
early trials may be lost. It's usually possible to use space
that is freed up somewhere in the interim if the worst comes
to the worst.
The plaintiff, which is simply seeking to collect the contract
price of construction work, has done all it needs to to
indicate its readiness for trial. That occurred some three
months ago. The defendant's quibbles are based on the idea
that the third party, a firm of engineers who are now named,
are going to be brought into the proceeding as a third party.
-- 2 of 3 --
3 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
It seems to me the defendant has been taking its time in this
regard. Still, nothing has been revealed as to the precise or
general basis on which the third party is said to be at fault,
although I accept from Mr Stretton that, within his firm,
thought has been given to that and the case is being worked
up.
Acknowledging the possibility that it's uncertain what will
emerge when and if the third party is joined in relation to
the exigencies of the preparation for trial affecting it, I
think it's preferable to get things moving. The defendant's
performance in this regard has been less expeditious than one
would hope for, and the listing may serve to improve that
situation.
Order as per initialled draft.
-----
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2012/319