Benussi v Morello [2012] QDC 128
1-1
[2012] QDC 128
DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE ROBIN QC
No 1479 of 2012
JED SHANE BENUSSI Applicant
and
VITO SEBATIAN MORELLO Respondent
BRISBANE
..DATE 20/04/2012
ORDER
CATCHWORDS
Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002, s 36(5), s 40(9), s
59(2)(b)
With cooperation of impecunious respondent, compulsory
conference and mandatory final offers dispensed with -
applicant allowed an additional 12 months to commence a
proceeding in expectation his injuries should stabilise within
that time
-- 1 of 3 --
1-2 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
HIS HONOUR: The Court makes an order in terms of the
initialled draft. It abridges the time for service of the
application which is superseded by an amended application the
subject of leave to file today. The respondent has been
served but not appeared when called. He has been informed of
the proposed amendment by an email sent by the applicant's
solicitors yesterday to which he responded by his own email
indicating agreement.
What is, therefore, being ordered, effectively by consent, is
that under section 36(5) of the Personal Injuries Proceedings
Act 2002 the requirement of the parties to participate in a
compulsory conference be dispensed with. Also the obligation
on the parties to exchange mandatory final offers is being
dispensed with under section 40(9).
Finally, under section 59(2)(b) the applicant's given leave to
commence proceedings on or before 25 April 2013. That has the
effect of extending the limitation period for a year to
accommodate understandable desires of the parties; in
particular, it's anticipated that the plaintiff's injuries,
which were burns, may have settled in the next year so that a
better idea of the long term consequences is available.
The circumstances are unusual. On Anzac Day 2009 a bonfire
was being held at the respondent's residence in Stanthorpe.
Something or other which shouldn't have got into the fire did,
occasioning a serious explosion which injured, the Court's
told, not only the applicant but others as well.
-- 2 of 3 --
1-3 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
The respondent occupier is now self-acting and explains the
cooperative attitude he's taking by reference to his
impecuniosity from the point of view of funding attendance at
or representation at conferences the like and also from the
point of view of making any offers. He says he hasn't got any
money.
So, order as per initialled draft.
-----
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2012/128