Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Larry [2011] QSC 120
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Larry [2011]
QSC 120
PARTIES: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF
QUEENSLAND
(Applicant)
and
THOMAS ANDREW LARRY
(Respondent)
FILE NO/S: BS396 of 2011
DIVISION: Trial Division
PROCEEDING: Originating application
ORIGINATING
COURT:
Supreme Court
DELIVERED ON: 19 May 2011
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARING DATE: 3 May 2011
JUDGE: Boddice J
ORDER: Pursuant to Division 3 of the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual
Offenders) Act 2003 the respondent be released from
custody subject to specified conditions until 22 May 2021
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCE - SENTENCING ORDERS
- ORDERS AND DECLARATIONS RELATING TO
SERIOUS OR VIOLENT OFFENDERS OR DANGEROUS
SEXUAL OFFENDERS - DANGEROUS SEXUAL
OFFENDER - CONTINUING DETENTION OR
SUPERVISION - FACTORS RELEVANT TO DECISION –
Where the Attorney-General seeks orders under Division 3 of
the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act for an
-- 1 of 12 --
2
indefinite detention order or alternatively, for release from
custody subject to conditions – Where the respondent
represents a high risk of sexual re-offending – Whether
adequate protection of the community can be reasonably and
practically managed by a supervision order
Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003
Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Francis
[2006] QCA 324
Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Lawrence
[2010] 1 Qd R 505
Fardon v Attorney-General for the State of Queensland
(2004) 223 CLR 575
COUNSEL: Scott, AD for the applicant
Mumford, B for the respondent
SOLICITORS: Crown Law for the applicant
Legal Aid Queensland for the respondent
[1] This is the final hearing of an application by the Attorney-General for orders under
Division 3 of the Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (“the Act”).
[2] The Attorney-General seeks orders pursuant to s 13(5)(a) of the Act:
(a) the respondent be detained in custody for an indefinite term for care, control
or treatment;
(b) alternatively, the respondent be released from custody subject to conditions.
Background
[3] The respondent, a Torres Strait Islander, was born on 12 November 1976. He is
currently serving a period of imprisonment for a number of offences. That sentence
is due to expire on 22 May 2011.
[4] Relevantly, this sentence includes a sentence of eight years for burglary and
attempted rape committed on 8 March 2002. The respondent broke into the home
of the complainant in the early hours of the morning. He placed a doona over a
window of the complainant’s bedroom before waking her up and attempting to rape
her. The complainant struggled and screamed. The offence of rape was not
ultimately committed. During the incident, the respondent punched the complainant
on three separate occasions causing significant injuries.
-- 2 of 12 --
3
[5] The respondent’s current period of imprisonment also includes a term of three
months for an offence committed at the Lotus Glen Correctional Facility on 10 June
2008. The complainant was conducting a certificate course at the centre when the
respondent, then a prisoner at the facility, unexpectedly stood up, pulled his pants
down, exposed his genitals and gave the complainant a note containing a poem.
The respondent explained his conduct as having had “a brain snap”.
[6] During his current period of imprisonment, the respondent has completed a number
of programs, including the Sexual Offending Maintenance Program. The last of
these courses was completed in 2009.
[7] On 30 May 2010, an incident was reported to have occurred at the Townsville
Correctional Centre involving the respondent and a nurse at that Centre. It was
reported that during a consultation, the respondent became sexually aroused and
touched the nurse just below her right buttock. He then allegedly tried to pull the
nurse towards him and asked that she examine his penis. The respondent was
charged with sexual assault in relation to this incident. However, the charge was
struck out after the prosecution offered no evidence in relation to it.
[8] The respondent’s criminal history is as follows:
Date Description of Offence Sentence
Thursday
Island
Magistrates
Court
16/08/1994
• Break and enter place with intent (on
28/5/94);
• Burglary (on 5/3/93)
No conviction recorded
12 mths probation
Restitution $103.40
pursuant to s 91(A)
Penalties and Sentences
Act
No conviction recorded
12 mths probation
pursuant to s 91(A)
Penalties and Sentences
Act
Thursday
Island
Magistrates
Court
16/03/1995
• Break and enter dwelling house with
intent (on/abt 19/12/94);
• Stealing (on/abt 19/12/94
On all charges: convicted
and fined $900
Costs $49.52
Compensation $180
Cairns
Magistrates
Court
22/01/1996
• Breach bail undertaking Convicted and fined $240
-- 3 of 12 --
4
Date Description of Offence Sentence
Cairns
Magistrates
Court
31/07/1996
• Application for fine option order (re:
22/01/96, breach Bail Act)
Granted
Fine option order 28 hours
community service
Cairns
Magistrates
Court
1/08/1996
• Breach Bail Act (contempt) (on
14/2/96)
Convicted and sentenced
imprisonment 2 mths
Cairns
Magistrates
Court
2/08/1996
• Breach probation order imposed on
16/8/94 (re: break and enter place)
Pursuant to s 125(2)(A)
Penalties and Sentences
Act $103.40 compensation
In default 3 days imp
4 mths time to pay
Cairns
Magistrates
Court
9/08/1996
• Aggravated assault on a female (on
14/07/96)
Convicted and fined $525
Costs $49.25 in default
imp 14 days time to pay 6
mths
Cairns
Magistrates
Court
17/03/1997
• Breach fine option order imposed on
31/07/96 (re: 22/01/96, breach Bail Act)
Order revoked
Cairns
Magistrates
Court
28/10/1997
• Breach bail undertaking (on 11/9/96) Convicted and sentenced
imp 2 mths
Mareeba
Magistrates
Court
19/12/1997
• Obstruct police (2 chgs on 11/3 and
9/6/97;
• Enter or in dwelling and commit
indictable offence (btn 26/7 and 4/8/97;
• Wilful damage (on 10/10/97);
• Stealing (on 11/3/97)
On each charge: convicted
and sentenced 1 mth imp
On each charge: convicted
and sentenced 6 mths imp
Cairns
District
Court
• Robbery with actual violence (on
13/10/97)
• Grievous Bodily Harm (on 13/10/97)
On each charge:
conviction recorded; 5
years imp; all terms of imp
are to be served
-- 4 of 12 --
5
Date Description of Offence Sentence
12/06/1998 concurrently; all sentences
to be effective from 7/6/98
Cairns
District
Court
12/06/1998
• Break and enter dwelling house with
intent in the night-time (on 25/5/95);
• Assault occasioning bodily harm (on
25/5/95)
Conviction recorded; 2 yrs
imp
Conviction recorded; 6
mths imp
All terms of imp to be
served concurrently; all
terms effective from
7/6/98
Cairns
Magistrates
Court
16/06/1998
• Breach Bail Act (contempt) (on
27/10/97);
• Obstruct police officer in performance
of duty (on 13/10/97)
Cause shown; convicted;
no penalty imposed
Cairns
Magistrates
Court
25/06/2002
• Breach bail undertaking (on 30/5/02) Convicted and not further
punished
Cairns
District
Court
18/06/2003
• Assault occasioning bodily harm in
company (on 19/04/03);
• Assault occasioning bodily harm (on
22/04/03)
Above refers to indictment no. 276/03
• Stealing (on/abt 8/03/02);
• Wilful damage (on 8/03/02);
• Escape by person in lawful custody (on
8/03/02);
• Enter dwelling with intent with
circumstances of aggravation (on
8/03/02);
• Attempted rape (on 8/03/02);
• Assault occasioning bodily harm (on
8/03/02)
On each charge:
conviction recorded 2 yrs
imp
On each charge:
conviction recorded 12
mths imp
On each charge:
conviction recorded 8 yrs
imp; declare deft to be a
serious violent offender
Conviction recorded 3 yrs
imp
All terms of imp to be
served concurrently;
declare time spent in pre-
sentence custody be
deemed as time already
served under this sentence
-- 5 of 12 --
6
Date Description of Offence Sentence
Above refers to indictment no. 266/02 (110 days btn 9/03/02 and
19/03/02 and btn 28/02/03
and 18/06/03)
Cairns
Magistrates
Court
18/06/2003
• Stealing (on 28/02/03);
• Possession of property suspected stolen
or unlawfully obtained (on 28/02/03);
• Obstruct police officer (2 chgs on
8/03/02);
• Common assault (on 8/03/02);
• Possess utensils or pipes etc (not to be
used for needles and syringes) (on
4/09/02);
• Enter dwelling without consent of
owner/person in lawful occupation (on
24/06/02);
• Obstruct police officer (3 chgs on
24/06/02, 28/02/03);
• Contravene direction or requirement (2
chgs on 24/06/02 and 28/02/03)
On each charge: convicted
and sentenced 1 mth imp
Convicted and sentenced 6
mths imp; concurrent
On each charge: convicted
and sentenced 7 days imp
On each charge: convicted
and fined $150 I/D imp 3
days no time to pay
Mareeba
Magistrates
Court
28/07/2008
• Indecent act in any place with intent to
insult or offend any person (on
10/06/08)
Convicted and sentenced 3
mths imp; cumulative
[9] This history includes two previous sexual offences. The first was committed in the
early hours of 5 March 1993 at Coconut Island. The complainant woke to find the
respondent standing naked in her bedroom. He left when told to do so by the
complainant. The second offence occurred on the night of 25 May 1995 at
Warraber Island. On that occasion, the complainant woke to find the respondent
sitting on top of her. He smelt of alcohol. The complainant punched the respondent
who punched her in the face before running away.
[10] The respondent’s criminal history also includes offences of violence. On 9 August
1996, the respondent was convicted of aggravated assault of his ex-girlfriend. The
assault involved punching her in the back of the head and punching her again in the
jaw whilst following her. He subsequently pushed her in the side of the head before
leaving the scene. On 12 June 1998, the respondent was convicted of having, in
company, stolen a pair of tracksuit pants and unlawfully doing grievous bodily
harm. The circumstances of that offence involved the random selection of an
-- 6 of 12 --
7
entirely innocent person and a brutal beating of that person. On 7 March 2002, the
respondent threatened a drinking companion with a butter knife, forcing her into the
bedroom. He stated he was going to stab her but was subdued when another person
came into the bedroom. On 18 June 2003, the respondent was convicted of assault
occasioning bodily harm. This offence was committed on 19 April 2003 whilst he
was in custody at the Cairns watchhouse.
Statutory framework
[11] The objects of the Act are to provide for continued detention and supervision of a
particular class of prisoner, and to provide continuing control, care or treatment of a
particular class of prisoner to facilitate their rehabilitation.1 The Attorney-General
bears the onus of satisfying the Court, by acceptable and cogent evidence to a high
degree of probability that the respondent is a serious danger to the community in the
absence of a Division 3 order.2 The respondent will be such a serious danger if
there is an unacceptable risk the respondent will commit a serious sexual offence if
he is released from custody, or if he is released from custody without a supervision
order being made. 3 There are a number of factors to be considered in determining
what is an unacceptable risk.
[12] In determining whether the respondent is a serious danger to the community, the
Court must have regard to the following matters:
(a) any report produced under s 8A of the Act;
(b) reports prepared by psychiatrists under s 11 of the Act and
the extent of the respondent’s co-operation during the
examination;
(c) other medical, psychiatric, psychological assessments
relating to the respondent;
(d) information indicating whether or not there is a propensity
on the part of the respondent to commit serious sexual
offences in the future;
(e) the pattern of offending behaviour on the part of the
respondent;
(f) efforts by the respondent to address the cause or causes of
the offending behaviour and his participation in
rehabilitation programs;
(g) whether or not the respondent’s participation in
rehabilitation programs has had a positive effect on him;
(h) the respondent’s antecedents and criminal history;
(i) the risk of the respondent committing another serious sexual
offence if released into the community;
1 Section 3 of the Act
2 Sections 13(1), (3) and (7) of the Act.
3 See Fardon v Attorney-General for the State of Queensland (2004) 223 CLR 575 at [60] and [225].
-- 7 of 12 --
8
(j) the need to protect members of the community from that
risk;
(k) any other relevant matter. 4
[13] In the event the Court is satisfied the respondent is a serious danger to the
community, the Court may make a Division 3 order in relation to the respondent.
The Division 3 order may either be a continuing detention order or a supervision
order. It is for the Court’s discretion whether such an order should be made in the
circumstances.5 The Attorney-General bears the onus of satisfying the Court that a
continuing detention order rather than a supervision order should be made.6
[14] In deciding whether to make such an order, the paramount consideration is the need
to ensure the adequate protection of the community.7 The Court must consider
whether adequate protection of the community can be reasonably and practically
managed by a supervision order, and whether its requirements can be reasonably
and practically managed by corrective services officers.8 If supervision is apt to
ensure adequate protection of the community, a supervision order should in
principle be preferred,9 although such an order is not to be made if the Attorney-
General satisfies the Court a supervision order will not afford adequate protection to
the public.10
Evidence
[15] A large body of affidavit material was relied upon at the hearing. In addition,
specialist reports were tendered from three psychiatrists, Dr Michael Beech,
Dr Donald Grant and Dr Scott Harden. Each psychiatrist was called to give
evidence. Whilst there were differences in their reports, each agreed that whilst the
respondent presents a high risk of re-offending, both sexually and violently, if
released into the community, that risk could, with appropriate supervision and
monitoring together with conditions in respect of abstinence from alcohol and
ongoing assistance as to places of accommodation, be reduced to a level such that
his continued detention in custody was not justified in the circumstances.11
[16] The one area of difference between the psychiatrists related to the significance of
the incident alleged to have occurred on 30 May 2010. Dr Harden, in a
supplementary report, had opined that that incident was of such significance as to
give rise to a concern that no amount of monitoring would render the risk associated
with releasing the respondent into the community reasonable. In evidence,
Dr Harden accepted the fact that the charge did not ultimately proceed meant the
incident should be placed in a lesser category, although it was still relevant to be
considered depending upon the basis for the decision to not continue further with
that prosecution.12 In evidence, Dr Beech and Dr Grant both agreed that incident
4 See s 13(4) of the Act.
5 Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Lawrence [2010] 1 Qd R 505 at [28]-[30].
6 Lawrence at [31].
7 Section 13(6)(a) of the Act.
8 Section 13(6)(b) of the Act.
9 Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Francis [2006] QCA 324 at [39].
10 Attorney-General for the State of Queensland v Lawrence [2010] 1 Qd R 505 at [33].
11 T1-7, T1-9, T1-13, T1-15, T1-20, T1-24, T1-25, T1-26
12 T1-24
-- 8 of 12 --
9
may be relevant depending upon the circumstances of the discontinuance of that
prosecution.13
[17] Notwithstanding that proviso, each psychiatrist opined that the proposed conditions
were generally reasonable (some were considered to be unnecessary),14 and would
provide sufficient protection for the community in the event the respondent was
released under a continuing supervision order.
Conclusions
[18] Having regard to the opinions expressed by the specialists psychiatrists, I am
satisfied the respondent is a serious danger to the community in the absence of a
Division 3 order. The respondent has a prolonged history of sexual and violent
offences. He committed his 2008 exposure offence after the completion of relevant
courses. His explanation for the motivation of that offence indicates that
notwithstanding the completion of those programs, he continues to exhibit a
tendency to externalise blame for his offending. Further, that offence occurred
without the disinhibiting influence of alcohol or illicit substances, which
demonstrates a capacity to re-offend sexually without those influences. Risk
assessments made over a number of years place the respondent in the high risk
category. Those assessments include the three expert psychiatric assessments made
by Doctors Beech, Grant and Harden. I am satisfied a Division 3 order should be
made in respect of the respondent.
[19] Whilst a Division 3 order ought to be made, the opinions expressed by Drs Beech,
Grant and Harden suggest there is no need for a continuing detention order. The
risks of re-offending, albeit high, can be adequately met by the imposition of a
supervision order. Each psychiatrist proffered the opinion that that order should be
for a period of ten years, particularly having regard to the respondent’s age. I am
satisfied it is appropriate the order be for that period. I am also satisfied the
proposed conditions will adequately address the continuing risk associated with the
imposition of a supervision order. This is particularly so having regard to the
accommodation arrangements that have been reached for the respondent’s
accommodation upon release.
[20] I am satisfied to the requisite standard that the respondent, is a serious danger to the
community in the absence of an order pursuant to Division 3 of the Dangerous
Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003.
[21] I order:
1. The respondent be released from custody subject to conditions.
2. The respondent must:
(a) be under the supervision of an authorised Corrective Services officer
for the duration of the order;
(b) report to an authorised Corrective Services officer at the Queensland
Corrective Services Probation and Parole Office closest to his place
of residence between 9am and 4pm on the day of release from
13 T1-5, T1-12, T1-17
14 T1-20
-- 9 of 12 --
10
custody and at that time advise the officer of the respondent’s current
name and address;
(c) report to, and receive visits from, an authorised Corrective Services
officer at such times and at such frequency as determined by
Queensland Corrective Services;
(d) notify and obtain the approval of an authorised Corrective Services
officer for every change of the respondent’s name at least two (2)
business days before the change occurs;
(e) comply with a curfew direction or monitoring direction;
(f) comply with any reasonable direction under s 16B of the Act given
to the prisoner;
(g) comply with every reasonable direction of a Corrective Services
officer that is not directly inconsistent with a requirement of the
order;
(h) not leave or stay out of Queensland without the written permission of
an authorised Corrective Services officer;
(i) seek permission and obtain approval from an authorised Corrective
Services officer prior to entering into an employment agreement or
engaging in volunteer work or paid or unpaid employment;
(j) notify the authorised Corrective Services officer of the nature of his
employment, or offers of employment, the hours of work each day,
the name of his employer and the address of the premises where he is
or will be employed at least two (2) days prior to the commencement
or any change;
(k) reside at a place within the State of Queensland as approved by a
Corrective Services officer by way of a suitability assessment;
(l) must seek permission and obtain the approval of an authorised
Corrective Services officer prior to any change of residence;
(m) demonstrate reasonable efforts to secure alternative, viable long term
accommodation to be assessed for suitability by Queensland
Corrective Services if accommodation is of a temporary or
contingency nature;
(n) not reside at a place by way of short term accommodation including
overnight stays without the permission of the authorised Corrective
Services officer;
(o) not commit an indictable offence during the period of the order;
(p) not commit an offence of a sexual nature during the period of the
order;
-- 10 of 12 --
11
(q) respond truthfully to enquiries by authorised Corrective Services
officers about his activities, whereabouts and movements generally;
(r) not to have any direct or indirect contact with a victim of his sexual
offences;
(s) disclose to an authorised Corrective Services officer upon request the
name of each person with whom he associates and respond truthfully
to requests for information from an authorised Corrective Cervices
officer about the nature of the association, address of the association,
address of the associate if known, the activities undertaken and
whether the associate has knowledge of his prior offending
behaviour;
(t) notify an authorised Corrective Services officer of the make, model,
colour and registration number of any vehicle owned by or generally
driven by him, whether hired or otherwise obtained for his use;
(u) submit to and discuss with an authorised Corrective Services officer
a schedule of his planned and proposed activities on a weekly basis
or as otherwise directed;
(v) if directed by an authorised corrective services officer, make
complete disclosure of the terms of this supervision order and the
nature of his past offences to any person as nominated by an
authorised Corrective Services officer, who may contact such
persons to verify that full disclosure has occurred;
(w) abstain from the consumption of alcohol for the duration of this
order;
(x) abstain from illicit drugs for the duration of this order;
(y) submit to any form of drug and alcohol testing including both
random urinalysis and breath testing as directed by the authorised
Corrective Services officer;
(z) disclose to an authorised Corrective Services officer all over the
counter medication that he obtains;
(aa) not visit premises licensed to supply or serve alcohol, without the
prior written permission of the authorised Corrective Services
officer;
(bb) attend upon and submit to assessment, treatment, and/or medical
testing by a psychiatrist, psychologist, social worker, counsellor or
other mental health professional as directed by an authorised
Corrective Services officer at a frequency and duration which shall
be recommended by the treating intervention specialist;
(cc) permit any medical, psychiatrist, psychologist, social worker,
counsellor or other mental health professional to disclose details of
treatment, intervention and opinions relating to level of risk of re-
offending and compliance with this order to Queensland Corrective
-- 11 of 12 --
12
Services if such a request is made for the purposes of updating or
amending the supervision order and/or ensuring compliance with this
order;
(dd) attend any program, course, psychologist or counsellor, in a group or
individual capacity, as directed by an authorised Corrective Services
officer in consultation with treating medical, psychiatric,
psychological or other mental health practitioners where appropriate;
(ee) must develop a risk management plan in consultation with a treating
psychologist or psychiatrist and discuss it as directed with an
authorised Corrective Services officer;
(ff) notify an authorised Corrective Services officer of any computer or
other device connected to the internet that he regularly uses or has
used;
(gg) supply to an authorised Corrective Services officer any password or
other access code known to him to permit access to such computer or
other device or content accessible through such computer or other
device;
(hh) allow any device where the internet is accessible to be randomly
examined using a data exploitation tool to extract digital information
or any other recognised forensic examination process;
(ii) advise an authorised Corrective Services officer of the make, model
and phone number of any mobile phone owned, possessed or
regularly utilised by the respondent within 24 hours of connection or
commencement of use, including the reporting of any changes to
mobile phone details;
(jj) not access pornographic images on a computer or on the internet or
purchase or obtain pornographic material in any other format without
the prior written approval of an authorised corrective services officer
in consultation with the treating psychiatrist or psychologist; and
(kk) take prescribed drugs as directed by a medical practitioner and
disclose details of all prescribed medication as requested to an
authorised corrective services officer.
-- 12 of 12 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/2011/120