Ask Funding Ltd v Ligi Lee Chiu [2011] QDC 148
1-1
[2011] QDC 148
DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE ROBIN QC
No 136 of 2011
ASK FUNDING LIMITED
(ACN 094 503 385) Plaintiff
and
LIGI LEE CHIU Defendant
BRISBANE
..DATE 12/07/2011
ORDER
CATCHWORDS
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999, r 116
Substituted service ordered on defendant's local solicitors in
accordance with his repeated advice, notwithstanding
solicitors' assertion their retainer did not extend to
accepting service - defendant overseas
-- 1 of 3 --
1-2 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
HIS HONOUR: The Court makes an order in terms of the
initialled draft.
It relieves the plaintiff from the embarrassing consequences
of having limited its costs claim to "$1,615 for costs of
issuing the claim and the statement of claim." That is
changed to the simply expression "costs."
It also permits substituted service of the claim and statement
of claim on a Gold Coast solicitor in circumstances where it's
made to appear that the defendant has left her address on the
Gold Coast and moved to another address where, indeed, the
process server found her the day after his unsuccessful
attempt to serve her at the known address. Unfortunately, he
apparently wasn't in a position to effect service on that day.
There appears to have been no difficulty until recent times in
telephone contact being made with the defendant who has
advised that a nominated solicitor on the Gold Coast who's
attending to various matters for her should be served. He
says that his retainer doesn't extend to accepting service of
Court process. The defendant has renewed her instructions to
the plaintiff that he should be served. She's presently out
of the country in Taiwan and unable to say when she'll be
returning.
In the circumstances, it seems appropriate to order service on
a solicitor who, whatever the terms are of his retainer in his
view, appears to be in regular contact with the defendant.
-- 2 of 3 --
1-3 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
Order as per initialled draft.
-----
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2011/148