Clayton UTZ lawyers v P & W Enterprises Proprietary Limited [2011] QDC 325

1-1 [2011] QDC 325 DISTRICT COURT APPELLATE JURISDICTION JUDGE SAMIOS CLAYTON UTZ LAWYERS (A FIRM) Plaintiff/Respondent and P & W ENTERPRISES PROPRIETARY LIMITED Applicant/Defendant BRISBANE ..DATE 07/06/2011 ORDER -- 1 of 2 -- 1-2 ORDER 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 HIS HONOUR: Regarding that final point raised by Mr Fraser, I am satisfied that notice does not have to be given to counsel. The objection raised speaks for itself and it is a matter that will be taken into account by the costs assessor. I do not think that in essence the counsel are required to be parties, as it were, to that item number. That is a matter for the costs assessor to determine. If it's not worded accurately, then that will be a matter for the - for PW Enterprises Pty Ltd to either apply for an amendment or wear the consequences. In all the circumstances, having considered the submissions that have been made today, I am going to make an order as per the draft prepared by the plaintiff, Clayton Utz Lawyers (a Firm) that has been handed up to me by Mr Fraser in his material. They'll be - that'll be the order. Yes, thank you. MR ROBINSON: Thank you, your Honour. MR FRASER: Thank you, your Honour. HIS HONOUR: Thank you. ----- -- 2 of 2 --