EHT Pty Ltd v The Brock Shop Pty Ltd & Anor [2011] QDC 94
1-1
[2011] QDC 94
DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE ROBIN QC
No 547 of 2009
EHT PTY LTD Plaintiff
and
THE BROCK SHOP PTY LTD
and
FRANCES MARY ARGIRO
and
GIUSEPPE ARGIRO Defendants
BRISBANE
..DATE 19/05/2011
ORDER
CATCHWORDS
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 990, r 991
Leave to plaintiff's solicitors to withdraw - court does not
follow usual practice of nominating an address that may be
used for service pending proper notification of a new one -
defendants' solicitors did not take up opportunity to seek
that benefit - service on plaintiff's registered office
available under the general law.
-- 1 of 3 --
1-2 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
HIS HONOUR: The court makes an order in terms of the
initialled draft.
This is an application by the solicitors on the record for the
plaintiff company for leave to withdraw. They establish that
they have carried out the steps required by rules 990 and 991
to be entitled to the order.
My usual practice in such a situation is to protect other
parties who are at risk of losing the advantage of a useable
address for service upon the withdrawal of solicitors, by
indicating an address which may be used for service on the
party losing representation until some new address for service
is properly notified. The arrangements directed typically
authorise use of the address of the withdrawing solicitors, it
being made clear that they are no longer the solicitors and
are under no obligation beyond holding documents to await
inquiry by the erstwhile client.
Mr Stretton in this instance has persuaded me the court ought
not to trouble his firm even to that extent. There are some
good reasons to fall in with his approach. One is that he has
notified the defendants' solicitors of this application. They
have acknowledged that and indicate they don't wish to appear.
They haven't indicated that they'd like anything in particular
done in relation to an address for service.
-- 2 of 3 --
1-3 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
Next is the consideration that the plaintiff is a company with
a registered office at which, under the general law, documents
can be served and by use of post.
Finally, it is relatively unusual that the solicitors
withdrawing represent a plaintiff. In the typical case
they're representing a defendant. Loss of a useable address
for service suffered by a plaintiff in the general run of
things is likely to be more of a blow than the corresponding
loss imposed on a defendant.
...
HIS HONOUR: Order as per initialled draft.
-----
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2011/094