Burns v Queensland Police Service [2010] QDC 463
[2010] QDC 463
DISTRICT COURT
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
JUDGE SAMIOS
No D76 of 2010
EDWARD ROBERT WAYNE BURNS Appellant
and
QUEENSLAND POLICE SERVICE Respondent
TOOWOOMBA
DATE 24/11/2010
JUDGMENT
-- 1 of 4 --
2
HIS HONOUR: This is an appeal against the learned
Magistrate's sentence imposed on 20 August 2010 in the
Toowoomba Magistrates Court. The appellant, who was born on
14 October 1991, appeals on the ground that the sentence
passed by the learned Magistrate was manifestly excessive.
The sentence imposed by the learned Magistrate was that the
intensive correction order imposed on the appellant on
30 April 2010 be revoked and that he be sentenced to the
unexpired portion of the order from the date of the offence
the appellant committed on the 18th of May 2010. That is, he
was sentenced to the unexpired portion, being from the 18th of
May 2010 to the 29th of January 2011. The intensive
correction order made on 30 April 2010 was for a period of
nine months.
The learned Magistrate though, when it came to fixing a parole
release date, as the sentence was less than three years, fixed
the 28th of January 2011 as the parole release date. He gave
no reasons for setting a date that was more than halfway into
the sentence and gave no opportunity to the representatives of
the appellant and the respondent to make submissions about
that aspect of the matter.
It is clear the learned Magistrate erred in the approach he
took. There's no complaint about requiring the appellant to
serve the unexpired portion of the intensive correction order
as a term of imprisonment. The complaint rather is that he
was given no apparent benefit for his plea of guilty and no
-- 2 of 4 --
3
reasons were given for selecting a date more than halfway in
the sentence.
The learned Magistrate has often mistook this aspect of the
law. The authorities are available. The notes on R v Kitson
[2008] QCA 086, relied upon by the appellant today, are to be
found in paragraph 101035B.1 of the Carter's Criminal Law of
Queensland, which I assume is available to the learned
Magistrate. There the notes say the Court of Appeal
considered a sentence of nine months' imprisonment with a
parole release date set after three-quarters of the sentence
had been served. The sentence was imposed after a plea of
guilty by the accused. Fraser JA, with whom Fryberg and
Lyons JJ agreed, noted that where an accused had a claim upon
the discretion that a parole release date be set after serving
less than half of the head sentence in view of the plea of
guilty, a parole release date which is significantly beyond
the mid-point of the head sentence is very unusual. If such
an unusual order was made, the duty to give reasons requires
that the sentencing remarks explain the process of reasoning
underlying it. Where such a decision is being contemplated by
the sentencing Judge, the parties should be given an
opportunity to be heard.
The full text of the case is available. Mr Lynch, who appears
on behalf of the appellant today, offered me a copy. I have
considered the decision before and I have considered this type
of ground of appeal before, coming from the learned
Magistrate. It must stop. The learned Magistrate must cease
-- 3 of 4 --
4
making these orders. The effect is to impose an order that is
not according to law but also incurs considerable stress and
strain on those who are not given the benefit of these orders
as they should be made, and costs are incurred.
I allow the appeal. I confirm the learned Magistrate's
revoking the intensive correction order pursuant to section
127(1) of the Penalties and Sentences Act and I confirm his
committal of the appellant to prison for the portion of the
term of imprisonment to which the offender was sentenced that
was unexpired on the date the relevant offence against section
123(1) was committed.
However, as to the parole release date, I vacate that order
made by the learned Magistrate and I order that the appellant
be sentenced to a parole release date of the 25th of November
2010, which is tomorrow.
-----
-- 4 of 4 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2010/463