Bryce v McDonald [2010] QDC 428
1-1
[2010] QDC 428
DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE ROBIN QC
No 3184 of 2009
VAUGHAN BRYCE Applicant
and
SCOTT OWEN McDONALD Respondent
BRISBANE
..DATE 26/10/2010
ORDER
CATCHWORDS
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999
Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (repealed)
Substituted service of application for "criminal compensation"
by newspaper advertisement and service on respondent's mother
- service address desired by applicant to be kept confidential
(to placate Corrective Services authorities)
-- 1 of 3 --
1-2 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
HIS HONOUR: The court makes an order in terms of the
initialled draft allowing substituted service of an
application for compensation under the Criminal Offence
Victims Act 1995.
The applicant's solicitor is being punctilious in declining to
disclose to the court the address supplied to him by
Corrective Services for purposes of serving such an
application on the offender respondent. On the evidence, it
appears that he does not live there at all. So one wonders at
the need for such circumspection.
What is proposed is an advertisement in the Courier-Mail
newspaper to permit the hearing of the application to occur
before the sentencing Judge on 15 November 2010.
I thought it appropriate to make that advertisement a little
more informative by indicating that the application follows
the respondent's conviction on 25 July 2007.
I have also required copies of the originating application and
affidavit and of the order to be served on the respondent's
mother at an address elliptically described the circumstances
to preserve confidentiality. That lady has provided certain
information regarding the whereabouts of her son who is said
to be overseas and perhaps unsurprisingly been uncooperative
in respect of accepting service. It is difficult in the
circumstances to be confident about the efficacy of the
advertisement in the newspaper but there is reason to think
-- 2 of 3 --
1-3 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
that the lady is in a position to inform the respondent about
the application.
Order as per initialled draft.
-----
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2010/428