Chien v CPT Manager Ltd & Quad Services Pty Ltd [2010] QDC 324
1-1
[2010] QDC 324
DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE ROBIN QC
No 2269 of 2010
CATHERINE CHIEN Applicant
and
CPT MANAGER LIMITED and
QUAD SERVICES PTY LTD Respondents
BRISBANE
..DATE 13/08/2010
ORDER
CATCHWORDS
Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002, s 43
Whether evidence before court sufficiently indicated consent
of proposed defendants to leave being granted to commence a
proceeding
-- 1 of 3 --
1-2 ORDER
HIS HONOUR: The court makes an order in terms of a consent
order on which I have written the heading "Draft Order".
It authorises the applicant to start proceedings in respect of
injuries suffered in a fall or falls on 19 August 2007, which
means that the limitation period is about to run out.
The applicant and the two respondents, proposed defendants,
have been engaged in carrying out the pre-litigation steps
mandated by the Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002.
Those respondents have separately signed copies of the consent
order. So far as the first respondent, which was the owner of
the shopping centre where the applicant fell, is concerned,
there is a signature by a firm of solicitors on the relevant
document.
In respect of the second defendant, which has been selected as
the relevant cleaning contractor charged with keeping the
premises safe, the word "solicitor" has been struck out and
replaced by "claims manager".
The court proceeds on the basis that either Quad Services Pty
Ltd had its own claims manager clothed with authority to sign
such a document on its behalf or that the "claims manager" is
representing a relevant insurer.
Exhibit 2 is a letter of the applicant's solicitors to the
second respondent and the other entity alluded to above. The
-- 2 of 3 --
1-3 ORDER
return of the signed consent order was the response. Making
the order is justified in the circumstances.
...
-----
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2010/324