Davies v Bundaberg Regional Council [2010] QPEC 100
1-1
[2010] QPEC 100
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COURT
JUDGE ROBIN QC
P & E Appeal No 323 of 2008
GRANT DAVIES AND OTHERS Appellants
and
BUNDABERG REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent
and
BRISBANE
..DATE 16/09/2010
..DAY 1
ORDER
CATCHWORDS
Integrated Planning Act 1997, s 4.1.23
Where appellants have been inactive and respondent Council
wishes to advance the appeal - Council's costs reserved to
"raise the stakes" and encourage appellants to do something
-- 1 of 2 --
1-2 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
HIS HONOUR: What I'm going to do is raise the stakes here.
Essentially, it’s a situation where the appellants are driven
to request an adjournment of the matter. It's granted until
the 7th of October 2010 which is what the appellants have
requested. Under the legislation, that puts the appellants in
the situation where they are at risk of being ordered to pay
costs occasioned by the adjournment.
I'm going to reserve the respondent/Council's costs occasioned
by this adjournment. The least the court can do for the
Council is put the appellants in a position where they know
that unless they do what the Planning & Environment Court
Rules require and seek directions from the court for the
orderly progress of the appeal towards a resolution in the
court, they are at risk of orders for costs being made under s
4.1.23 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997.
Also, for what it's worth, they're at risk of having the
proceeding dismissed for want of prosecution. The appellants
are entitled to some understanding because of indisposition
of the solicitor acting, but the stage has been reached, I
think, where a sterner approach has to be taken so that things
start to happen. Nothing happened at or consequent upon a
mention (by telephone) on 2 September 2010.
Mr O’Brien appearing for the Council has fairly informed the
court that he was in Brisbane from Bundaberg today on account
of another matter.
-----
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QPEC/2010/100