DIY Tiles Pty Ltd v Cole & Anor [2009] QDC 365
1-1
[2009] QDC 365
DISTRICT COURT
IVIL JURISDICTION C
UDGE ROBIN QC J
o 1059 of 2009 N
.I.Y. TILES PTY LTD D Plaintiff
and
JILL MAREE COLE AND
TEPHEN NICHOLAS JOHN COLE Defendants
S
RISBANE B
.DATE 15/10/2009 .
RDER O
ATCHWORDS C
niform Civil Procedure Rules r 292 U
Summary judgment application upon a guarantee providing for
liability on demand adjourned to allow plaintiff to present
vidence of the demand before action e
-- 1 of 3 --
1-2 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
HIS HONOUR: This is a summary judgment application under rule
292. The respondent to it is the defendant Jill Maree Cole
who has not appeared when called, although served by service
upon the solicitors who were acting until very recently. She
is now self-represented.
She is sued as the guarantor. I've perused her pleading which
doesn't look very promising by way of establishing a defence,
asserting principally that she was induced to provide the
guarantee by her co-guarantor and former partner, that he had
undertaken in events which had happened to ensure she was not
liable under it, etc.
Notwithstanding those favourable circumstances for the
application, the plaintiff, represented by Mr Thomae, has
taken a cautious approach, feeling unable to distinguish the
circumstances from those considered in Equititrust Limited v
Gamp J and P Development Proprietary Limited [2009] QSC 115 at
paragraph 19.
The importance of establishing, on an application such as the
present one, the making of a demand upon the guarantor, where
the instrument of guarantee in terms provides that the
guarantor should be liable on demand, was emphasised.
Mr Thomae informs the Court that the plaintiff can establish a
demand but has not done so in material filed in Court to date.
I respect his reluctance to spare his client the risk involved
-- 2 of 3 --
1-3 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
in relying on doctrines whereby the commencement of
proceedings may constitute a demand.
In these circumstances, the application will be adjourned
until the 22nd of October 2009 as requested with the costs
reserved. Order as per initialled draft.
-----
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2009/365