Blue Thunder Holdings Pty Ltd v Thompson & Ors [2009] QDC 43
1-1
[2009] QDC 43
DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE ROBIN QC
No 2328 of 2005
BLUE THUNDER HOLDINGS PTY LTD
(ACN 108 632 846) Plaintiff
and
GRAEME DOUGLAS THOMPSON
and
GR8 PUB INVESTMENTS (NO 3) PTY LTD
(ACN 109 081 772)
and
GR8 PUB SYSTEMS PTY LTD
(ACN 099 414 918)
First Defendant
Second Defendant
Third Defendant
BRISBANE
..DATE 30/01/2009
ORDER
CATCHWORDS: Plaintiff company's agent, not a lawyer,
presented a draft order for ADR signed by the defendants'
solicitors to indicate consent, but with provision for costs
deleted - his application for costs said to have been paid to
a lawyer to prepare the application documents not acceded to,
but adjourned.
-- 1 of 2 --
1-2 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
HIS HONOUR: The Court makes an order in terms of the
initialled draft.
It requires the parties to participate in a mediation before
Mr Ashton. The order is made by consent on the basis of
Exhibit 1 which is a facsimile communication to Mr Weldon (who
appears as the applicant's agent) dated 12th of January 2009.
The communication annexes a copy of the order Mr Weldon seeks
but with a paragraph providing for payment by the respondent
of the applicant's costs deleted. Mr Weldon is not a
solicitor, he tells the Court, but he still wishes to pursue
the costs aspect in respect of sums he has paid to a lawyer to
get documents prepared. There may or may not be an
entitlement to recover those costs. I express no view about
it but I'm not prepared to do any more today than add to the
provisions that Exhibit 1 indicates consent to orders
reserving costs and providing liberty to apply. I do not
think that goes beyond the consent.
So, orders as per initialled draft, by consent.
-----
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2009/043