Ariel v Australian Securities and Investments Commission & Anor [2006] QSC 404
State Reporting Bureau
jsccQ QSC 40\
Queensland Government
Department of justice and Attorney-General
a
Transcript of Proceedings
Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made or sold without the written authority
of the Director, State Reporting Bureau.
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JONES J
REVISED COPIES ISSUED
State Reporting Bureau
Date: 24 October, 2006
Application No 378 of 2006
FREDERICK GRAEME ARIEL Applicant
and
AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES & INVESTMENTS First Respondent
COMMISSION
and
JENNIFER ANN HUNTER Second Respondent
CAIRNS
..DATE 20/10/2006
JUDGMENT
WARNING: The publication of information or details likely to lead to the identification of persons in some proceedings is a criminal
offence. This is so particularly in relation to the identification of children who are involved in criminal proceedings or proceedings for
their protection under the Child Protection Act 1999, and complainants in criminal sexual offences, but is not limited to those
categories. You may wish to seek legal advice before giving others access to the details of any person named in these proceedings.
1
4th Floor, The Law Courts, George Street, Brisbane, Q. 4000 Telephone: (07) 3247 4360 Fax: (07) 3247 5532
-- 1 of 3 --
20102006 D.1 T4/KLW ( CNS ) M/T CNS1/2006 (Jones J)
HIS HONOUR: I will give some brief reasons. This is an
application by Mr Ariel, a former director of Kobblestone Park
Pty Ltd, which was deregistered on the 26th of June 2005 by an
administrative process, by ASIC. It was deregistered because
the company had failed to file annual returns for the years
2003 and 2004.
The company is at the apex of the Raging Thunder group of
companies which comprises some nine other corporate entities.
At the time of the deregistration Mr Ariel was the sole
director of the company, although the company records show
that there was another director, namely, his former wife. Her
directorship effectively ceased in the year 2000, when
pursuant to a property settlement in the Family Court her
directorship was ceased, and her shareholding in the company
was transferred to the applicant.
I am satisfied on the material presented to me that the
company was, at the time of deregistration, solvent and it
would resume its position as a solvent company once
reregistered .
The failure to lodge the returns and other documents was
simply an oversight on the part of those controlling the
company, and that situation apparently has been accepted by
ASIC, which in its letter dated 19th of October 2006 has
indicated he does not oppose the re-registration of the
company .
1
10
20
30
40
50
2 JUDGMENT 60
-- 2 of 3 --
20102006 D.l T4/KLW(CNS) M/T CNS1/2006 (Jones J)
Between the date of deregistration, the 26th of June 2005, the 1
company has continued to engage in activities under that name.
The applicant seeks an order validating those transactions
which are set out in paragraph 24 of his affidavit. It is
appropriate in all the circumstances, particularly given the 0
continuing solvent status of the company that those actions be
validated .
In those circumstances I will make orders in terms of the
draft, initialled by me and placed with the papers.
40
50
3 JUDGMENT 60
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/2006/404