Equititrust Corp v Boscorp Pty Ltd & Ors [2006] QSC 216
State Reporting Bureau
JzcOtZj QSC Zlb
Queensland Government
Department of Justice and Attorney-General
Transcript of Proceedings
Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made or sold without the written authority
of the Director, State Reporting Bureau.
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHESTERMAN J
No 9622 of 2004
EQUITITRUST CORP
and
BOSCORP PTY LTD
and
MARIA BOSILJEVAC
and
STEVO BOSILJEVAC
and
STEVE ZELJKO BOSILJEVAC
BRISBANE
..DATE 31/07/2006
JUDGMENT
WARNING: The publication of information or details likely to lead to the identification of persons in some proceedings is a criminal
offence. This is so particularly in relation to the identification of children who are involved in criminal proceedings or proceedings for
their protection under the Child Protection Act 1999, and complainants in criminal sexual offences, but is not limited to those
categories. You may wish to seek legal advice before giving others access to the details of any person named in these proceedings.
1
REVISED COPIES ISSUED
State Reporting Bureau
Date: 4 August, 2006
Plaintiff
First Defendant
Second Defendant
Third Defendant
Fourth Defendant
4th Floor, The Law Courts, George Street, Brisbane, Q. 4000 Telephone: (07) 3247 4360 Fax: (07) 3247 5532
-- 1 of 3 --
HIS HONOUR: In this action, 9622 of 2004, the plaintiff seeks
to recover moneys advanced by it to the first defendant which
were guaranteed by the second, third and fourth defendants.
Each of those were directors and shareholders of the first
defendant Boscorp Pty Ltd. Another company has been added and
has become plaintiff by counterclaim, that is, Boscorp No 1
Pty Ltd. That company is owned and controlled solely by the
fourth defendant Mr Steve Bosiljevac Jr, the son of the second
and third defendants.
This action was called on for trial this morning after I had
tried another related action, 3793 of 2005. The plaintiff was
the same, but the defendants in that action were Mr Stevo
Bosiljevac and Mrs Maria Bosiljevac. I have reserved judgment
in that action. In the course of it, Mrs Bosiljevac appeared
for herself and her husband and gave evidence. She became
quite distressed and emotional, and when I indicated that I
would be obliged on the evidence to give judgment against her
and her husband, they left and declined to stay for the
hearing of the second action.
None of the other defendants in that action, that is, 9622 of
2004, have appeared, though they have been called. It is
clear from some evidence given by Mrs Bosiljevac that her son
Steve knows that the trials of these actions were to proceed
today. He has chosen not to come. It follows that both
Boscorp Pty 'Ltd and Boscorp No 1 Pty Ltd also knew that today
was set down as the first day of the trial against the
31072006 BLP (Chesterman J)
2 JUDGMENT
-- 2 of 3 --
companies. It is therefore appropriate to continue ex parte
and deal with the plaintiff's case. The defendants, I make it
abundantly clear, have had adequate notice of the trial and
have chosen for their own reasons not to appear to resist it.
The claim is one for moneys advanced on six separate occasions
by Equititrust Limited to Boscorp. The details of the
advances appear in the statement of claim and in the affidavit
of Mr Mclvor, who speaks for the plaintiff in his affidavit of
14 December 2004 in action 9622 of 2004. Moneys were advanced
to enable Boscorp to conduct some property development at the
.Gold Coast. The advances are fully documented, as is the
obligation of the second, third, and fourth defendants to
guarantee the payment of moneys advanced to Boscorp by the
plaintiff.
It is clear from Mr James' affidavit, filed this morning by
leave, that there is a balance outstanding. Some moneys have
been recovered; some have been repaid; but of the moneys
advanced, together with interest, there is an outstanding debt
owed by Boscorp Pty Ltd of $2,614,245.92. I therefore give
judgment for that amount against the first, second, third, and
fourth defendants, and I make orders in terms of the draft
handed to me by Mr Jackson, which I initial.
31072006 BLP (Chesterman J)
1
10
20
30
40
50
3 JUDGMENT 60
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/2006/216