Clement v Backo & Suncorp Metway Insurance Ltd (No 2) [2006] QSC 119
[2006] QSC 119
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CIVIL JURISDICTION
DUTNEY J
No 592 of 2005
JOHN RADCLIFFE CLEMENT Plaintiff
and
ELTON MERVYN BACKO First Defendant
SUNCORP METWAY INSURANCE LIMITED Second Defendant
ROCKHAMPTON
..DATE 05/05/2006
JUDGMENT
-- 1 of 2 --
2
HIS HONOUR: This is a matter in which I gave judgment in Brisbane on the 26th of April
2006 in favour of the plaintiff against the second defendant in the sum of $539,044.08.
It was subsequently- drawn to my attention by the solicitor for the plaintiff that in giving
judgment, I did not include an amount of $10,900 which was claimed for past meal
allowance, notwithstanding that I allowed for the future an amount of $37,500.
Both the future amount of $37,500 and the $10,900 amount for the past were figures which
were agreed between counsel for the plaintiff and counsel for the second defendant.
The omission of $10,900 was an oversight on my part. At my request, the solicitor for the
plaintiff filed an application seeking to have the judgment amended to include the amount
which had been omitted by my mistake. The second defendant does not oppose the
application.
Accordingly, I amend the judgment by including that additional sum. There will therefore be
judgment for the plaintiff against the second defendant in the sum of $549,944.08 in lieu of
the amount of the judgment previously pronounced. The order for costs made previously was
that the second defendant pay the plaintiff's costs to be assessed on an indemnity basis. That
order will stand.
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/2006/119