Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Ryan & Mann [2006] QDC 21
1
WARNING: The publication of information or details likely to lead to the identification of persons in some proceedings is a criminal
offence. This is so particularly in relation to the identification of children who are involved in criminal proceedings or proceedings for
their protection under the Child Protection Act 1999, and complainants in criminal sexual offences, but is not limited to those
categories. You may wish to seek legal advice before giving others access to the details of any person named in these proceedings.
[2006] QDC 021
DISTRICT COURT
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE ROBIN QC
No BD3269 of 2005
AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING
GROUP LIMITED (ACN 005 357 522) Plaintiff
and
PETER FRANCIS RYAN First Defendant
and
LENORE KAREN MANN Second Defendant
BRISBANE
..DATE 03/02/2006
ORDER
CATCHWORDS: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 116 - order in
application "on the papers" for substituted service of a
defendant resident in a secured high-rise apartment block in
face of difficulties encountered in meeting him for service.
-- 1 of 2 --
03022006 T24/PCC29 M/T CMS11/2006 (Robin DCJ)
2 ORDER
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
HIS HONOUR: This is an application "on the papers" for an
order for substituted service on the first defendant. The
affidavit material shows that he has changed his residence
from one "secured high-rise apartment block" at Main Beach on
the Gold Coast to another. It is proving difficult for the
process server to effect service.
Such verbal contact as he has achieved - likewise, such verbal
contact as the plaintiff's solicitor has achieved - is never
followed up by return contact from Mr Ryan who, it seems, is
unlikely to be physically available for service by ordinary,
reasonable efforts. An order for service in another way
pursuant to rule 116 is therefore appropriate.
A draft order has been provided which contemplates service by
"leaving a copy of the claim" with the manager at the new
residential address and "forwarding a copy of the claim by
ordinary pre-paid mail" to that address. The order, as
initialled by me to indicate the Court's imprimatur, contains
three amendments: the word "also" is added at the end of (a)
to make it clear that both modes of service are required.
In addition, since the order deals with service of the claim
and statement of claim, I have inserted in each of (a) and (b)
after the word "Claim" the following: "and statement of
claim, together with a copy of this order". Order as per
initialled draft, which incorporates the above changes.
-----
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QDC/2006/021