Choy v Bradley & Ors; Prowse v Bradley & Ors [2006] QIRC 104 (2006) 183 QGIG 258
[Extract from Queensland Government Industrial Gazette,
dated 1 September, 2006, Vol. 183, No. 3, page 258]
QUEENSLAND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
Industrial Relations Act 1999 - s. 278 - application to vary or void a contract
Elijah Choy AND Mark Bradley, Vicki Bradley, Tralee Investments Pty Limited, Tralee Asset Management Pty
Ltd, Information Integration Pty Ltd and Data Liberation Pty Ltd (B/2004/683)
Cory Prowse AND Mark Bradley, Vicki Bradley, Tralee Investments Pty Limited, Tralee Asset Management Pty
Ltd, Information Integration Pty Ltd and Data Liberation Pty Ltd (B/2004/684)
COMMISSIONER BECHLY 23 August 2006
DECISION
On 7 July 2006 a hearing was conducted to consider an application by Mr Mark Bradley on behalf of the respondents to
strike out the substantive application on the grounds that Mr Bradley, one of several individual respondents, is a
bankrupt and that entities named as respondents are insolvent.
Various communications were received from Mr Bradley and Mrs Bradley, another individual respondent to the
substantive application.
Substantial advance notice was given to the date of hearing. The respondents were clearly informed that submissions in
support of the strikeout application would be required to be provided on 7 July 2006.
On that day the applicants in the substantive matter were represented by Mr James Yeatman of Harmers Workplace
Lawyers. No appearance was made for the respondents. The material provided by the Bradleys prior to 7 July was not
such as could be relied upon to arrive to any decision to strike the matter out.
The application to strike out the substantive matter is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This matter (the substantive matter) has been on foot for an excessive period of time. Adjournments have been granted
in the past because of Mr Bradley's medical condition and to suit legal proceedings in another State.
This matter must be progressed and brought to finality. Substantial consideration has been afforded to the respondents
to the initial unfair contract applications. The respondents have requested a further deferment of the matter to
November 2006. In accordance with the request, the matter will be set down for hearing on Monday 6 November 2006.
Four days will be set aside to deal with the matter.
The respondents are required to attend the Commission in Brisbane either personally or by way of instructed
representation on the above dates to enable the matter to be finalised. Appropriate Notice of Listing will be issued by
the Registrar.
R.E. BECHLY, Commissioner.
Hearing Details:
2006 7 July
Released: 24 August 2006
Appearances:
Mr J. Yeatman of Harmers Workplace Lawyers on behalf of the
applicants.
No appearance for the respondents.
Government Printer, Queensland
The State of Queensland 2006.
-- 1 of 1 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QIRC/2006/104