Equipment & Machinery Sales Pty Ltd, Re [2006] QLRT 73
LAND AND RESOURCES TRIBUNAL
QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Re Equipment & Machinery Sales Pty Ltd [2006]
QLRT 73
PARTIES: In the matter of Application for Mining Lease No
50224 by Equipment & Machinery Sales Pty Ltd
FILE NO/S: AML120/06
PROCEEDING: Application for mining lease
DELIVERED ON: 28 July 2006
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARING DATE: Heard on the papers
MEMBER: Windridge MR
ORDER/S: 1. Hearing dispensed with. (at [2])
2. Recommendation made that the Mining Lease
be granted. (at [17])
CATCHWORDS: MINING – MINING LEASE – RECOMMENDATION
Mineral Resources Act 1989, ss 245, 269(4), 270(1)
COUNSEL: N/A
[1] WINDRIDGE MR: This is an application by Equipment & Machinery Sales Pty
Ltd under s. 245 of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (the Act) for a mining lease over
27.72ha of land near Gore for limestone mining. The application was lodged at the
office of the Mining Registrar at Brisbane on 7 April 2006. No objection was lodged
before the closing date for objections.
Request to dispense with a hearing - Section 270
[2] I may dispense with a hearing if satisfied as to matters specified in s. 270(1). The
applicant has requested a hearing on the papers. I therefore dispense with the
hearing.
Section 269(4) criteria
[3] In taking account of and considering the criteria specified in s. 269(4), I have relied
upon the Additional Information and Statutory Declaration sworn by the applicant on
7 July 2006 and the material filed with the Mining Registrar in support of his
-- 1 of 3 --
application. These reasons refer to the salient points, but not to all the relevant
evidence, that I have taken into account in making my recommendation.
Section 269(4)(a) – Have the provisions of the Act been complied with?
[4] A Certificate of Application was issued by the Mining Registrar on 6 April 2006
which confirms that the applicant is eligible to apply for the mining lease and has
complied with the requirements of Part 7 of the MRA.
Section 269(4)(b) – Is the land applied for mineralised or are the other purposes for which
the lease is sought appropriate?
[5] The application seeks the grant of a mining lease for the purpose of mining limestone
and associated activities. The applicant has explored the area under the authority of a
current prospecting tenure. There are a number of other leases in the area. The area
is generally known for the production of limestone, and I am satisfied that the area is
generally mineralised.
Section 269(4)(c) – If the land applied for is mineralised, will there be an acceptable level
of development and utilisation of the mineral resources within the area applied for?
[6] The applicant proposes to mine the area using conventional open cut methods. The
applicant has the necessary infrastructure and equipment to complete the project.
There is no evidence to suggest that there will not be an acceptable level of
development and utilisation of the mineral resource in the area.
Section 269(4)(d) – Is the land and the surface area of that land in respect of which the
mining lease is sought of an appropriate size and shape?
[7] The boundaries of the lease have been determined by the area of potential
mineralisation. The applicant has sought a mining lease over the whole of the
surface area. There is no evidence to indicate the size and shape is not appropriate.
Section 269(4)(e) - Is the term sought appropriate?
[8] The applicant seeks a term of 20 years. There is no evidence to suggest that such a
term is inappropriate.
Section 269(4)(f) – Has the Applicant the necessary financial and technical capabilities to
carry on mining operations under the proposed mining lease?
[9] The applicant has sufficient assets, including the mining equipment required to
undertake the proposed operation. I am satisfied the applicant has or has access to
the necessary financial and technical resources.
Section 269(4)(g) – Has the past performance of the Applicant been satisfactory?
[10] There is no evidence to suggest that the past performance of the applicant has not
been satisfactory. The applicant has been involved in the industry for a number of
years and mines a current limestone lease nearby.
-- 2 of 3 --
Section 269(4)(h) – Will any disadvantage result to the holders of existing exploration
permits or mineral development licences or existing Applicants for exploration permits or
mineral development licences?
[11] There are no other holders or applicants for exploration tenures who would be
affected by the grant.
Section 269(4)(i) – Do the operations to be carried on under the authority of the mining
lease conform with sound land use management?
[12] The current land use is low intensity cattle grazing. Limestone mining is an
appropriate land use in this area.
Section 269(4)(j) – Will there be any adverse environmental impacts, and if so, the extent
thereof?
[13] The draft environmental authority was publicly advertised and no objections were
lodged in relation to it. There is no evidence to suggest that the environmental
impacts will not be adequately dealt with by compliance with the conditions of the
Code.
Section 269(4)(k) – Will the public right and interest be prejudiced?
[14] There is no public infrastructure on the area applied for. There was no evidence
before me that indicated public right and interest would be prejudiced.
Section 269(4)(l) – Has any good reason been shown for a refusal to grant the mining
lease?
[15] There was no evidence before me that indicated any good reason why this
application should be refused.
Section 269(4)(m) – Is the proposed mining operation an appropriate land use taking into
consideration the current and prospective uses of the land?
[16] On the basis of the evidence considered in relation to criteria (i), (j), (k) and (l), I
consider the proposed activity is an appropriate land use.
Recommendation
[17] Taking into account all the evidence before me and, in particular, that evidence
referred to above, I recommend to the Honourable the Minister for Natural
Resources, Mines and Water the mining lease be granted over the whole of the
application area for the purposes and term sought by the applicant.
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QLRT/2006/073