Doxford, Re [2006] QLRT 34
LAND AND RESOURCES TRIBUNAL
QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Re Clyde Ian Doxford [2006] QLRT 34
PARTIES: In the matter of Application for Mining Lease
No 70341 by Clyde Ian Doxford
FILE NO/S: AML0064/2006
PROCEEDING: Application for mining lease
DELIVERED ON: 28 April 2006
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARING DATE: Heard on the papers
MEMBER: Windridge MR
ORDER/S: 1. Hearing dispensed with. (at [2])
2. I recommend to the Honourable the Minister
for Natural Resources, Mines and Water that
Mining Lease No. 70341 be granted over the
whole of the application area for the purpose of
mining for gold for a term of 10 years. (at [17])
CATCHWORDS: MINING – MINING LEASE – RECOMMENDATION
Mineral Resources Act 1989 ss 245, 269(4), 270(1)
COUNSEL: N/A
SOLICITOR/S: N/A
[1] WINDRIDGE MR: This is an application by Clyde Ian Doxford under s. 245 of the
Mineral Resources Act 1989 (“the Act”) for a mining lease over 51.58ha of land on
Lot 1 on DC183 and Lot 127 on FTY1513, County of Dickson, Parish of Miclere,
located approximately 3 kilometres northwest of Blair Athol Mine. The application
was lodged at the office of the Mining Registrar at Emerald on 09 February 2005.
No objection was lodged before the closing date for objections which was 3 April
2006. The underlying tenure is State Forest.
Request to dispense with a hearing - Section 270
[2] I may dispense with a hearing if satisfied as to matters specified in s. 270(1). For
reasons that follow at paragraph [4], I am satisfied that the provisions of part 7 of the
Act have been complied with in respect of the application. There were no objections
-- 1 of 4 --
to this application. It appears there is no restricted land in the area the subject of the
application. I am satisfied that the preconditions to exercising my discretion to
dispense with the hearing have been fulfilled. The material supplied by the
Applicant and the Mining Registrar addresses each of the criteria that I must consider
in making my recommendation on this Application. I am satisfied that there is
sufficient information before me to properly consider this matter. Accordingly, I
order that a hearing of this Application be dispensed with.
Section 269(4) criteria
[3] In taking account of and considering the criteria specified in s. 269(4), I have relied
upon the Additional Information and Statutory Declaration sworn by the Applicant
on 10 April 2006. I have also relied upon the other material lodged by the Applicant
with the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Water and provided by the
Mining Registrar to this Tribunal and the Mining Registrar’s Report in relation to
this application. These reasons refer to the salient points, but not to all the relevant
evidence, that I have taken into account in making my recommendation.
Section 269(4)(a) – Have the provisions of the Act been complied with?
[4] A Certificate of Application was issued by the Registrar on 28 April 2005 which can
only be done if the Registrar is satisfied that the Applicant is eligible to apply for the
mining lease and has complied with the requirements of the Act with respect to
marking out, lodgement, posting, advertising and the giving of notices. I note the
relevant statutory declarations in these matters.
Section 269(4)(b) – Is the land applied for mineralised or are the other purposes for which
the lease is sought appropriate?
[5] The application seeks the grant of a mining lease for the purpose of mining gold.
The Applicant has explored the area under the authority of a prospecting permit and
Exploration Permit (12928). He has located surface signs and intends to operate in
areas previously disturbed from mining in the 1980’s. The area is generally known
for the production of alluvial gold. I am satisfied that there is adequate evidence of
mineralisation, and current prices will give a positive return.
Section 269(4)(c) – If the land applied for is mineralised, will there be an acceptable level
of development and utilisation of the mineral resources within the area applied for?
[6] The Applicant proposes to mine the area using open cut mining methods, dry
blowing the material and rehabilitating as mining progresses. The Applicant has
been involved in the mining industry for a number of years, and has mined in this
area for approximately two years. He has mined on at least 4 other leases in this
area. Very little infrastructure will be needed to complete the project. There is no
evidence to suggest that there will not be an acceptable level of development and
utilisation of the mineral resource in the area.
Section 269(4)(d) – Is the land and the surface area of that land in respect of which the
mining lease is sought of an appropriate size and shape?
-- 2 of 4 --
[7] The boundaries of the lease have been determined by the area of potential
mineralisation. The Applicant has sought a mining lease over the whole of the
surface area that shows recoverable gold. There is no evidence to indicate the size
and shape is not appropriate.
Section 269(4)(e) Is the term sought appropriate?
[8] The Applicant seeks a term of 10 years. There is no evidence to suggest that a
10 year term is inappropriate. The Applicant has the option of surrender if mining
and rehabilitation is completed before the term expires.
Section 269(4)(f) – Has the Applicant the necessary financial and technical capabilities to
carry on mining operations under the proposed mining lease?
[9] The Applicant has sufficient assets, including the mining equipment required, to
undertake the proposed operation. I am satisfied the Applicant has or has access to
the necessary financial and technical resources.
Section 269(4)(g) – Has the past performance of the Applicant been satisfactory?
[10] There is no evidence to suggest that the past performance of the Applicant has not
been satisfactory. The Applicant states that for all the time he has been mining he
has had no previous fines, show cause or convictions in relation to mining.
Section 269(4)(h) – Will any disadvantage result to the holders of existing exploration
permits or mineral development licences or existing Applicants for exploration permits or
mineral development licences?
[11] The Applicant held a prospecting permit and exploration permit at the time of
marking out. I am satisfied that no other person is disadvantaged.
Section 269(4)(i) – Do the operations to be carried on under the authority of the mining
lease conform with sound land use management?
[12] The current land use is state forest with low intensity cattle grazing (under a special
lease) under favourable conditions. The holder of the special lease did not lodge any
objection to the application. I note compensation agreements have been lodged with
the Registrar.
Section 269(4)(j) – Will there be any adverse environmental impacts, and if so, the extent
thereof?
[13] The draft environmental authority was issued on 1 April 2005, effective from date of
grant of tenure. It requires the Applicant to comply with the environmental
conditions contained in the Code of Environmental Compliance for Mining Lease
Projects. The draft authority was publicly advertised and no objections were lodged
in relation to it. There is no evidence to suggest that the environmental impacts will
not be adequately dealt with by compliance with the conditions of the Code.
Section 269(4)(k) – Will the public right and interest be prejudiced?
-- 3 of 4 --
[14] There is no public infrastructure on the area applied for. There was no evidence
before me that indicated public right and interest would be prejudiced. I take into
account that there was no objection to this application on public interest grounds.
Section 269(4)(l) – Has any good reason been shown for a refusal to grant the mining
lease?
[15] There was no evidence before me that indicated any grounds which would justify a
refusal of the Application.
Section 269(4)(m) – Is the proposed mining operation an appropriate land use taking into
consideration the current and prospective uses of the land?
[16] On the basis of the evidence considered in relation to criteria (i), (j), (k) and (l), I
consider the proposed activity is an appropriate land use.
Recommendation
[17] Taking into account all the evidence before me and, in particular, that evidence
referred to above, I recommend to the Honourable the Minister for Natural
Resources, Mines and Water that the mining lease be granted over the whole of the
application area for the purpose and term sought by the Applicant.
-- 4 of 4 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QLRT/2006/034