Fazzari, Re [2005] QLRT 74
LAND AND RESOURCES TRIBUNAL
QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Re Fazzari [2005] QLRT 74
PARTIES: Re Application for Mining Lease No. 60334 by
Frank Fazzari
FILE NO/S: NTML148/03
PROCEEDING: Application for mining lease
DELIVERED ON: 23 June 2005
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARING DATE: Heard on the papers
MEMBERS: Koppenol P and Windridge MR
ORDER/S: The Tribunal’s native title issues decision is that
Application for Mining Lease No. 60334 applied for
by the Applicant, may be granted for the purpose,
area and term applied for, subject to the contract
conditions set out in Attachment A. (at [6])
CATCHWORDS: MINING – MINING LEASE APPLICATION –
NATIVE TITLE ISSUES DECISION –
COMPENSATION
Mineral Resources Act 1989, ss 271(1)(c), 675(1),
677(1), 711
Land and Resources Tribunal Act 1999, s. 41(2)
COUNSEL: N/A
SOLICITORS: Mr Fazzari (Applicant) appeared on his own behalf
Ms L. O’Neill (Department of Natural Resources and
Mines) for the State of Queensland
Mr F. Power (Queensland South Representative Body
Aboriginal Corporation) as amicus curiae
[1] KOPPENOL P: On 13 August 2004, I recommended that subject to compliance
with all relevant provisions of Part 17 (native title provisions for mining leases) of
-- 1 of 3 --
the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (the Act), Application for Mining Lease No. 60334
applied for by the Applicant be granted for the purpose, area and term applied for.1
[2] Earlier this month, the Honourable the Minister for Natural Resources and Mines
referred Mr Fazzari’s application back to the Tribunal under section 271(1)(c) of the
Act for the Tribunal to make a native title issues decision under section 675(1).
[3] Section 675(1) of the Act provides as follows:
“675 Nature of native title issues decision
(1) The native title issues decision must be 1 of the following—
(a) that the proposed mining lease may be granted;
(b) that the proposed mining lease may be granted, but subject to either or both of the
following—
(i) that conditions, described or identified in the native title issues decision, are to be
included in the mining lease;
(ii) that conditions (contract conditions), described or identified in the native title issues
decision, are required to be complied with by 1 or more of the consultation and
negotiation parties (even though the conditions are not included in the mining lease);
(c) that the proposed mining lease should not be granted.”
[4] At the directions hearing on 6 June, the State of Queensland submitted that the
appropriate native title issues decision would be that the proposed mining lease may
be granted but subject to certain conditions (contract conditions) as set out in Exhibit
3. Mr Fazzari indicated that he was agreeable to that and the native title parties were
given until midday yesterday to make any submissions about those proposed
conditions. No submissions were made.
[5] This matter was heard by a panel constituted by Windridge MR and me; however the
decision is required to be made by me alone.2 I have examined the proposed contract
conditions and regard them as appropriate in the present case. In so concluding, I
have taken into account the various factors set out in section 677(1)-(3),3 insofar as I
1 Re Fazzari [2004] QLRT 75.
2 Land and Resources Tribunal Act 1999, section 41(2). In making my decision, I conferred with Mr Windridge.
3 Section 677(1)-(3) is in the following terms:
“677 Tribunal’s native title issues decision
(1) In making its native title issues decision, the tribunal must take into account the following—
(a) the effect of the grant of the proposed mining lease on—
(i) the enjoyment by the registered native title parties of their registered native title rights and interests; and
(ii) the way of life, culture and traditions of any of the registered native title parties; and
(iii) the development of social, cultural and economic structures of any of the registered native title parties; and
(iv) the freedom of access by any of the registered native title parties to the land; and
(v) the freedom of any of the registered native title parties to carry out rites, ceremonies or other activities of cultural
significance on the land in accordance with their traditions; and
(vi) any area or site on the land of particular significance to the registered native title parties in accordance with their
traditions;
(b) the interests, proposals, opinions or wishes of the registered native title parties in relation to the management, use or
control of land in relation to which there are registered native title rights and interests of the registered native title parties
that will be affected by the grant of the proposed mining lease;
(c) the economic or other significance of the grant of the proposed mining lease to Australia, Queensland, the area in which
the land is located and Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders who live in the area;
(d) any public interest in the granting of the proposed mining lease;
(e) any other matter the tribunal considers relevant.
(2) In deciding the effect of the grant of the proposed mining on the matters mentioned in subsection (1)(a), the tribunal must also
take into account the nature and extent of—
(a) existing non-native title rights and interests in relation to the land; and
(b) existing use of the land or waters by persons other than the registered native title parties.
(3) In complying with subsections (1) and (2) the tribunal must take into account all objections lodged under this division to the
granting of the proposed mining lease, and any other documents lodged or filed under this division.”
-- 2 of 3 --
was able to having regard to the material before me. I note that those conditions
include provision for the payment of compensation (clause 2). In those
circumstances, section 711 of the Act applies to make it a condition of the mining
lease that the leaseholder must comply with that clause.4
[6] There will therefore be an order that the Tribunal’s native title issues decision is that
the proposed Mining Lease No. 60334 may be granted subject to the contract
conditions set out in Attachment A.
4 Section 711 provides as follows:
“711 Conditions of agreement or compensation decision
If there is an agreement about compensation under this part, or a compensation decision, for a relevant act relating to a mining claim
or mining lease, it is a condition of the mining claim or mining lease that the holder of the claim or lease must comply with the
terms of the agreement or decision that apply to the holder.”
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QLRT/2005/074