Di Carlo v Dubois & Ors [2004] QCA 46
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Di Carlo v Dubois & Ors [2004] QCA 46
PARTIES: SALVATORE DI CARLO
(plaintiff/appellant/applicant)
v
DR PHILIP JAMES DUBOIS
(first defendant/first respondent)
PHILIP DUBOIS (MEDICAL) PTY LIMITED
ACN 010 673 864 (deregistered)
(second defendant/second respondent)
DENNIS RICHARD OSBORNE, PHILIP JAMES
DUBOIS, STEPHEN BENNETT KELLER, PIYOOSH
KOTECHA, GARY EDWARD O'ROURKE, MARK
JAMES READY, PETER STOREY, CHARLES BRUCE
LEIBOWITZ, PETER CHARLES LUSH, NICHOLAS
DAUNT, DAVID ALEXANDER NOBLE and PETER
FERGUS LEGH, trading under the firm name or style of
QUEENSLAND XRAY SERVICES
(third defendant/third respondent)
DR MICHAEL CORONEOS
(fifth defendant/fourth respondent)
FILE NO/S: Appeal No 7132 of 2003
Appeal No 2504 of 2004
SC No 1281 of 1996
DIVISION: Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING: General Civil Appeal
ORIGINATING
COURT: Supreme Court at Brisbane
DELIVERED EX
TEMPORE ON: 24 February 2004
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARING DATE: 24 February 2004
JUDGES: Davies and Williams JJA and McMurdo J
Judgment of the Court
ORDER: Appeal with respect to damages against Dr Coroneos
dismissed
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – PRACTICE AND
PROCEDURE – QUEENSLAND - POWERS OF COURT –
ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES – whether appeal with
respect to damages against the fourth respondent should be
dismissed
-- 1 of 2 --
2
COUNSEL: N M Cooke QC for the appellant/applicant
R V Hanson QC, with P L Feely, for the first, second and
third respondents
No appearance on behalf of the fourth respondent
SOLICITORS: Baker Johnson Lawyers for the appellant/applicant
Flower & Hart for the first, second and third respondents
No appearance on behalf of the fourth respondent
DAVIES JA: The appeal with respect to damages against Dr Coroneos is dismissed.
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCA/2004/046