I AM THE LAW
Browse › Case law › Queensland

Douglas Shire Council v Walker [2003] QSC 355

Case law · Queensland · 2003
State Reporting Bureau feooilQsc 355- Queensland Gove rnment Department of Justice and Attorney-General Transcript of Proceedings Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made or sold without the written authority of the Director, State Reporting Bureau. SUPREME COURT CIVIL JURISDICTION WILSON J REVISED COPIES ISSUED State Reporting Bureau Date: 15 October, 2003 Application No 448 of 2003 DOUGLAS SHIRE COUNCIL Applicant and PHILLIP MELVILLE WALKER Respondent CAIRNS .. DATE 03/10/2003 JUDGMENT WARNING: The publication of information or details likely to lead to the identification of persons in some proceedings is a criminal offence. This is so particularly in relation to the identification of children who are involved in criminal proceedings or proceedings for their protection under the Child Protection Act 1999, and complainants in criminal sexual offences, but is not limited to those categories. You may wish to seek legal advice before giving others access to the details of any person named in these proceedings. 1 4th Floor, The Law Courts, George Street, Brisbane, Q. 4000 Telephone: (07) 3247 4360 Fax: (07) 3247 5532 -- 1 of 3 -- 03102003 D.l T5/KLW M/T CNS1/2003 (Wilson J) HER HONOUR: (1) (2) (3) The orders will be these: The respondent, whether by himself or his agents or servants or any of them, or otherwise, be restrained by injunction, from trespassing on the applicant's property by erecting a fence or other temporary structures, and movement of motor vehicles and equipment on the applicant's property after 4 p.m, on 24 October 2003; The respondent restore the property by removing the fence and other temporary structures and make good any damage to the property by 4 p.m, on 24 October 2003; The respondent pay the applicant's cost of the application . 1i 3 ( RESPONDENT: Excuse me, your Honour, the - the amount that they've said costs, that to me seems very high anyway, and I - do I — - --- HER HONOUR: Well, I can't — RESPONDENT: How do I ----- HER HONOUR: I can't determine the amount of the costs, but there is a procedure known as assessing costs which, if there's a dispute, is done by the taxing officer or a deputy Registrar of the Court. Now, that's something you'll have to follow through if you can't reach agreement on the amount of the costs. RESPONDENT: Right. HER HONOUR: All right. MR MORZONE: Your Honour's order, of course, for 5( clarification, is to - for the assessment on the standard basis . HER HONOUR: Yes. MR MORZONE: I think other discussions may have been on a different basis. 2 JUDGMENT SC -- 2 of 3 -- G3102QQ3 D.l T5/KLW M/T CNSX/2003 (Wilson J) HER HONOUR: Well, this only says costs of the application- MR MORZONE; Quite. HER HONOUR: And that is all that I would be prepared to order . MR MORZONE: And that's all we'll seek. Thank you, your Honour . 1 10 HER HONOUR: I will add that, actually, to be assessed on the standard basis. So the third order is the respondent to pay the applicant's costs of the application, to be assessed on the standard basis, 20 30 40 50 3 JUDGMENT SO -- 3 of 3 --