Edwards v Frain & Nominal Defendant [2002] QSC 409
State Reporting Bureau
good^50 40^
Queensland Government
Department of Justice and Attorney-General
Transcript of Proceedings
Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made or sold without the written authority
of the Director, State Reporting Bureau.
__ ___
REVISED COPIES ISSUED
Slate Reports! bureau
lie UW « /
SUPREME . COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JONES J
Plaintiff
First Defendant
Second Defendant
CAIRNS
..DATE 11/11/2002
JUDGMENT
Claim No 48 of 1999
JAI EDWARDS
and
JASON DAVID FRAIN
and
THE NOMINAL DEFENDANT
WARNING : The publication of information or details likely to lead to the identification of persons in some proceedings is a criminal
offence. This is so particularly in relation to the identification of children who are involved in criminal proceedings or proceedings for
their protection under the Child Protection Act 1999, and complainants in criminal sexual offences, but is not limited to those
categories. You may wish to seek legal advice before giving others access to the details of any person named in these proceedings.
1
4th Floor, The Law Courts, George Street, Brisbane, Q. 4000 Telephone: (07) 3247 4360 Fax: (07) 3247 5532
-- 1 of 2 --
11112002 D.l T2/AW M/T CNS1/2002 (Jones J)
HIS HONOUR: This is the matter of Edwards versus Frain and
The Nominal Defendant. The parties have reached agreement as
to the amount of the judgment for damages which the plaintiff
seeks.
Mr Houston of counsel representing the plaintiff and Ms Rolls
representing the defendants are prepared to consent to
judgment in the terms which appear in the draft order.
There is evidence, principally from Mr Robert Walkley,
psychologist, that it would be in the interest of the
plaintiff for the net proceeds of his personal injuries claim
be administered on his behalf pursuant to the provisions of
the Guardianship and Administration Act. The plaintiff
consents to this course being taken and The Public Trustee who
appears before me represented by Mr Davitt agrees to undertake
the guardianship administration pursuant to the terms of that
Act .
It seems to me in those circumstances that it is appropriate
to make orders which in the main are made by consent as they
appear in the draft which I now initial and place with the
papers.
2 JUDGMENT
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/2002/409