Briggs v Booth & Ors [2000] QSC 294
j,) b v=':j .
• State
Z)q)~
Reporting Bureau
<;c 00/;2_r1
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made
or sold without the written authority of the Director, State Reporting Bureau.
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JONES J
Application No 87 of 2000
MAVIS DULCIE PHYLLIS BRIGGS
and
BEATRICE EILEEN BOOTH
. and ANNETTE FRANCES BELL
and MARION MARY BLUNDSON
CAIRNS
.. DATE 01/08/2000
JUDGMENT
Respondent/Applicant
Applicants/Respondents
1
-- 1 of 2 --
01os2aoo D.l T2/MFK M/T CNS482/2000 (Jones J)
HIS HONOUR: I will order that the matter be transferred to
the tribunal and I will reserve the cost of these proceedings
to be determined by the tribunal.
HIS HONOUR: In this matter I will make orders by consent that
the applications before me be transferred to the Guardianship 10
and Administration Tribunal at Brisbane.
The parties have argued before me the question of costs of
these proceedings, each party wishing to be paid the costs.
In circumstances where I cannot adjudicate upon the merits of
bringing either application it seemed to me that there were
only two options open. One was to order that the costs of
both parties be paid out of the estate of the granter of the
enduring power of attorney on the basis that both applications
were reasonably instituted.
The alternative is, in transferring the matter to the
tribunal, to reserve the question of costs of these
proceedings to be determined in the discretion of the
tribunal. The parties before differed in preferring one of
30
40
~
I
these alternate options. Weighing the respective merits of ~-
dealing with the question of costs, it seems to me that the
better course is to reserve to the tribunal's decision the
question of costs in these proceedings.
If the tribunal ultimately feels unable or is unwilling to
make that determination the tribunal has the power to refer
the matter back to this Court for the determination of that
issue.
2 JUDGMENT
50
60
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/2000/294