Austin v Tuxworth & Woods Mossman Carriers Pty Ltd [2000] QSC 349
Reporting
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made
or sold without the written authority of the Director, State Reporting Bureau .
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JONES J
No 45 of 1996
BRETT IAN AUSTIN
and
TUXWORTH & WOODS MOSSMAN CARRIERS PTY LTD
CAIRNS
.. DATE 24/07/2000
JUDGEMENT
. <.?OOZi Li5c"''~'01
neaJn;:3 1~~ '.r'. · ·:: :•~c1s
0=1nss: S::1k'0'.J CE'.3li\3tl .
---.--..;;....;....Jt'+'""" ··~-· -~
Plaintiff
Defendant
-llh 1·111,w, The Law Courts, George Stred, Brishanc, Q. ,WOO Tch:phone: (07) J2..t7 -IJ(iO Fax: (07) 32-17 5.5J2
-- 1 of 2 --
24072000 D. T5/KEW M/T CNS444/2000 (Jones J)
HIS HONOUR: This is an application by the plaintiff to amend
the summons and statement of claim to include an additional
cause of action, viz breach of statutory duty.
The plaintiff was injured in a work related incident on 12
October 1995 and in respect of those injuries he seeks
damages. His initial writ of summons relied simply on the
cause of action of negligence. Since the handing down of the
decision of the High Court in Astley and Astley, he seeks now
to enlarge the scope of his action to include a claim for
breach of contract.
The defendant who appears before me by its solicitors, neither
consents nor opposes to the amendment. That being the case
there seems to be no reason why the Court should not accede to
the plaintiff's application.
I make orders in terms of the draft initialled by me and
placed with the papers.
2 JUDGMENT
10
30
40
·50
60
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/2000/349