Banyo Seminary Trust, Re [2000] QSC 215
~{
,.~,·-_,_ .•.·......
7
~O'tU\f,l·-~ -
~ --
J) lll-~~lll ti.eporrtilg HLC 6C 00(2!5~~--------------------------------------------------------------------------~--
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDiNGS
Copyright in this tr~nscript is vested in the Cro'>vn. Copies thereof must not be m.::1de
cr sold without the 'Nritten ~uthority of the Oirec:or, St.::1te Reporting Bure;Ju.
THE SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CIVIL JURISDICTION
WHITE J
No 3536 of 2000
IN THE MATTER OF THE TRUSTS ACT 1973
IN-THE MATTER OF THE BANYO SEMINARY TRUST
BRISBANE
.. DATE 10/05/2000
JUDGMENT
REVhSCD C~ ISSUED r
State Reporting 6ure.:::L:
Date 18 / S I co
&):<----------------,------------ ~
~~ 1·1""!, Tl1•: l.:nv (t~lll't.'i, C:~.·"q..:•: Stn:d, l:ri"l':lftt.:, (). -tllfl()
!®:
-- 1 of 9 --
10052000 T10/LM26 M/T 7439/2000 (White J)
HER HONOUR: This is an application pursuant to section
105 (1) (e) (iii) to apply part of the property of the Banyo
' Seminary Trust Cy-Pres.
The Attorney-General has been served and appears on this ~
application and I have been much assisted by Mr Green's
submissions on the Attorney's behalf and also by the
submissions of Mr G Gibson, QC, for the applicants who are
the Catholic Bishops of Queensland.
20
It is necessary to say something about the background to the
Banyo Seminary Trust.
A deed of trust which is the subject trust dated 11 April
30
1939 established a trust in Queensland to set up and conduct
a seminary or seminaries for the education of students for
the Roman Catholic priesthood.
The Bishops acquired land at Banyo for the purpose of
40
carrying out the trust. That task was to be carried out by
a Corporation, the directors of which were the Catholic
Bishops of Queensland for the time being. The land at Banyo
was acquired and the transfer registered in 1940.
50
Funds were sought from members of the Church to assist with
the construction of the new seminary. Today the Banyo
Seminary improvements consist of a residential college with
accommodation for 160 students and all the attendant
buildings which would go with such extensive living 60
2 JUDGMENT
-- 2 of 9 --
10052000 T10/LM26 M/T 7439/2000 (White J)
quarters, such as bathrooms and kitchens and so on. Also
included are conference rooms, a library and chapel, and
recreational and sporting facilities.
The Bishops seek to vary the purpose of the trust so as to 1p
enable an arrangement to be entered into with the Australian
Catholic University. That arrangement in essence is that
the Australian Catholic University will occupy 90 per cent
of the Banyo land for its university purposes and, in
effect, the facilities will be shared facilities. The trust 20
will retain exclusively about 10 per cent of the land.
Under the terms of the agreement with the Australian
Catholic University the University will pay the trustee of
the trust $3 million, will maintain the property and its
improvements and will pay all outgoings associated with the
land, for example rates and land taxes.
The Australian Catholic University is a well-known
institution which operates campuses throughout Australia.
It offers a variety of undergraduate programs including a
Bachelor of Theology, a Bachelor of Social Sciences in
pastoral counselling, and other humanitarian and Arts-like
courses.
This is not a decision which has been taken lightly by the
Bishops. As they set out in their joint affidavit, the
direction of the Catholic Church with respect to the
training of men for the priesthood has taken a significantly
3 JUDGMENT
30
40
50
60
-- 3 of 9 --
10052000 T10/LM26 M/T 7439/2000 (White J)
different turn as a consequence of the results of the Second
Vatican Council wherein the Church was directed to turn more
to its role in the world rather than the way in which
institutions such as the Banyo Seminary had been conducted
in the past which tended to be along monastic lines where a 1p
student for the priesthood was withdrawn from the family,
the parish and society.
Presently the students for the priesthood attached to the
Banyo Seminary live outside the seminary and attend there 20
for classes as would be the case in most university
situations.
The Bishops have considered a number of ways of dealing with
the land all of which have their drawbacks including a
proposal for a joint college of theology with other
churches.
There have been two inquiries conducted on behalf of the
Bishops since it was seen that its use, as was initially
envisaged in the trust, is now not practical. The first was
carried out by the Honourable William Carter QC and the
second by the Honourable Justice G E Fitzgerald, the first
in 1993 and the second in 1994.
The bishops are desirous of maintaining the Banyo land for a
variety of reasons, not least the important relationship
with the history of the Church in Queensland. However for
many years the Bishops have found it necessary to contribute
4 JUDGMENT
30
40
50
60
-- 4 of 9 --
10052000 T10/LM26 M/T 7439/2000 (White J)
from their own resources sums ln excess of $600,000 per
annum towards the maintenance of the Banyo Seminary. This,
of course, is a completely undesirable situation ar.d would
tend to undermine the use of the trust.
19-
The negotiations with the Australian Catholic University
have produced an extensive document which is exhibited to
the joint affidavit. It is necessary, I think, to refer
only to Clause 5 of that agreement which establishes a trust
between the trustee of the existing Banyo Seminary Trust and 20
the Australian Catholic University.
Clause 5 provides as follows:
"The Corporation will hold the Cy Pres Land to the use
of the University UPON TRUST for the carrying on by the
University upon the Cy Pres Land of a range of teaching
programs, teaching services and activities normally
associated with a Catholic University, consistent with
its constitution as from time to time in force and with
all Acts of Parliament and subordinate legislation made
thereunder from time to time affecting the University
or regulating its affairs and so as to facilitate,
where reasonably possible, educational arrangements
that will be of benefit to the Seminary/Theologate
conducted by the Corporation."
This may be considered with the original trust document
establishing the seminary which provides in Clause 2 the
30
40
purpose for which the Banyo Seminary Trust was established. 50
60
5 JUDGMENT
-- 5 of 9 --
10052000 T11/PMD18 M/T 7549/2000 (White J)
It provides:
"The trustees shall by all lawful means acquire and
receive real and personal property and (except where
special trusts are declared as hereinafter mentioned)
shall apply the same in or towards the establishment or
conduct of a regional seminary or regional seminaries
in Queensland for the education and training of
students for the Roman Catholic Priesthood for which
purpose they shall do and carry out or assist in doing
or carrying out all such matters and things as are
likely to promote the objects and purposes of such a
seminary or seminaries and may accept or acquire
property for the general purposes abovementioned or
upon special trusts connected with such a seminary or
seminaries either as original trustees or as new
trustees of any trusts already existing or as bare or
passive trustees without undertaking the management and
administration of such property where trusts of such
property in connection with such purposes are to be
administered by other trustees or managers Provided
that the trustees shall not be bound to accept property
for any of the foregoing purposes or for any purpose
unless they shall in their absolute discretion deem it
expedient so to do."
It can be seen that there is some coincidence of goals
between the proposal and the existing trust. For
completeness, it is appropriate to consider the objects of
the Australian Catholic University, which are set out in its
memorandum of association in clause 2.1, which are:
"2.1.1 to establish, operate, maintain and promote,
as part of the mission of the Roman Catholic
Church, the Australian Catholic University
("the University") in accordance with the
beliefs, traditions, practices and canonical
legislation of the Roman Catholic Church and
by doing so to promote culture and the
development of the human person;
6 JUDGMENT
20
30
40
50
60
-- 6 of 9 --
10052000 T11/PMD18 M/T 7549/2000 (White J)
2.1.2 to foster and promote education, scholarship
and research and through the education
programmes of the University provide and
promote preparation and continuing
development of persons inspired by Christian IC
principles who will be capable of assuming
positions of responsibility in the Church and
in society and in particular -
(a) to provide undergraduate and
postgraduate teaching programmes of
university standard;
20
(b) to create an environment for the
achievement of excellence in scholarship 30
and research;
(c) to bring students to a high standard of
professional development;
(d) to foster a Christian environment and
form a genuine human community amongst
the staff and students of the
University. "
40
50
Perhaps because of observations made by me in the decision
of Re Peirson Memorial Trust, unreported decision of 7
December 1995, counsel have considered the question whether
it is necessary when the property of an existing charitable 60
7 JUDGMENT
-- 7 of 9 --
10052000 T11/PMD18 M/T 7549/2000 (White J)
trust is to be applied Cy-Pres whether it is necessary to
establish a general charitable intention.
The passing comment which was made by me in that case was
not intended to suggest that was required. Once a trust has 1 ~
been established as a charitable trust that seems to me, on
authority, to be the end of the matter and the requirement
then is to follow the provisions of the Trusts Act. If it
is necessary to make that comment yet again I would say,
however, that this is clearly a matter which falls within 20
the ambit of a general charitable intention.
There is no doubt then that a scheme has been made necessary
by changing circumstances. Might I also add that in 1999
there are seven resident priests at the seminary catering
for eight candidates for the priesthood who are in training,
compared to 1967 when there were 122 students.
An aspect of the agreement with the Australian Catholic
University is that it can be revoked in appropriate
circumstances. That it has been constituted by a trust
rather than by some other method, such as a licence to
occupy, seems to me to be not a matter that would cause any
concern because of the provision of revocation in the
agreement.
The fact that the facilities are to be shared, that is
continue to be available for the purposes of the trust, is
another factor of some significance.
30
40
50
60
8 JUDGMENT
-- 8 of 9 --
10052000 Tll/PMD18 M/T 7549/2000 (White J)
The proposed terms are set out in the agreement to which I
have made reference and I think it unnecessary to refer to
them further. They have been carefully thought through and
seem to cover every aspect of the arrangements with the
Australian Catholic University, which has agreed to pay all 1 ~
the costs associated with the establishment of this new
arrangement.
I am of the view then that the terms proposed are acceptable
and that the property should be applied Cy-Pres. A draft 20
order has been prepared by the applicant, which has been
considered by the Attorney-General. It is in a simple form,
but seems to cover the case. So the order is as per draft.
30
40
50
60
9 JUDGMENT
-- 9 of 9 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/2000/215