Currumbin Sand & Gravel Pty Ltd, Re [2000] QMW 23
Warden's Court of Queensland 28 January 2000
JN THE WARDEN'S COURT [QP.IfENSLAND
Q4.,/ '-"> ;-
er:/ ~. 9' \ .
HELD AT BRISBANE IA$>: ,:~ .. . - •
IN THE MATTER OF:
BEFORE:
APPLICANT:
REPORT:
flr- •'- ,
...... -: ·...~,
APPLICATION UNDERPART 7 OF THE MINERAL
RESOURCES ACT 1989 FOR A MINING LEASE
(NUMBER 70214) IN THE EMERALD DISTRICT
MR A J CHILCOTT
ACTING MINING WARDEN
CURRUMBIN SAND & GRAVEL PTY.L1D.
Toe applicant (hereinafter referred to as the miner or applicant miner) seeks a mining
lease m1der the provisions of part 7 of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (hereinafter
referred to as the MRA or the act) for the purpose of mining for ZEOLITE and for the
purpose of STOCK PILE ORE/OVERBURDEN and TREA1MENT PLANT/MILL
SITE. The application is for a surface are~ of 6.475 hectares and is situated on LOT 6 on
GHFL 0/212199, County of PLANTAGENET, Parish of WOODBINE. Access is to be
gained through the same area. The lease if granted is to be known as ROBERT TWO.
Power to grant such a lease is vested in the Governor-in-Council pursuant to section 234
of the act after recommendation by the Minister. Except for the reservation in section
8(3), all minerals are the property of the Crown. The grant of a lease does not create any
estate or interest in the land (s.10), although there is the power to determine title to land
(s.363(5)). The landowner has no right of veto. The use of the land for the purposes
nominated is a permitted use under s.319 of the MRA. Any mining tenure is not subject
70214MLA.EME 1
[2000] QMW 23
-- 1 of 4 --
Warden's Court of Queensland 28 January 2000
(d) Is the area sought an appropriate size and shape?
There is nothing in the information supplied by the applicant to suggest that the surface
area of the land in respect of which the mining lease is sought is not an appropriate size
and shape. The area sought follows the surface indications.
(e) Is the term sought appropriate?
The term of lease applied for is twenty years. I am satisfied that the term sought is
appropriate and will allow for mining and rehabilitation to be completed. The applicant
has the option of renewal under s.286 of the Act, or surrender at an earlier date under
section 309.
(f) Has the applicant the necessary financial and technical capabilities to carry
on mining operations under the proposed mining lease?
From the information supplied, I am satisfied the applicant has the necessary financial
and technical capabilities or access to those resources to carry out the mining operation.
Mining for sapphire is basically an extractive industry utilising shallow open cuts and
does not require extensive plant, processing equipment, or large injections of capital. The
applicant has been involved in the mining industry for a number of years and in my
opinion has the experience necessary to complete the mining operation. [Carr -v-
Simnovec (1980) 26 SASR 263 at 268, and Pacminex -v- Aust. Nephrite Jade Mines
(1974) 7 SASR 401 at 415].
70214MLA.EME 4
-- 2 of 4 --
--------
Warden's Court of Queensland 28 January 2000
G) Will there be adverse environmental effects caused by the proposed
operation, and if so, the extent thereof?
An Environmental Management Overview Strategy (EMOS) has been lodged with the
Registrar and accepted under delegatio~ subject to any recommendation of this Court
and any further requirement of the Minister. This operation will become part of project
PJM 70021.
The proposed mining activity is in an isolated area away from human habitation. The
mining will not have any deleterious effect on any river or creek system. Chemicals will
not be used in the mining process. Due to low rainfall and the method of mining, erosion
will not be a problem provided the usual control measures are put in place. There are no
other environmental factors of significance which may be adversely effected by the
operation. It is observable from other operations that the disturbed crust retains more of
the natural rainfall, thereby encouraging the regeneration of native flora. The applicant
will be required to backfill where possible as mining progresses, keeping out-standing
rehabilitation to a bare minimum where possible.
By section 35 of the Mineral Resources Regulations 1990, the applicant is required to
maintain the lease and access free of parthenium weed and any other weed declared
under the Rural Lands Protection Act 1985.
(k) Will the public right and interest be prejudiced?
No factors prejudicial to the public right and interest have been identified. There appears
to be no endangered flora or fauna within the application area. There are no public
utilities on or across the application area. There are no sites of historical interest or
aboriginal significance within the area. If any such sites are identified, the EMOS can be
amended to put fotward specific site protection or site avoidance strategies.
70214MLA.EME 6
-- 3 of 4 --
Warden's Court of Queensland 28 January 2000
agreement has or has not been filed with the Registrar in accordance with s.279 of the
Act.
GENERAL COJ\.1:MENTS
This recommendation is based on an assessment of the information supplied. Should
there be any dispute over damage or loss, or should the miner depart from his plan of
operations or EMOS and cause loss or damage or interruption to the management of the
property not envisaged or not foreseen in the terms of the compensation agreement, the
parties are at liberty to apply to the Court for a determination or award of compensation,
and if necessary, injunctive relief under the powers contained in s.363(6).
RECOMMENDATION:
Upon consideration of all the matters set forth in s.269(4) of the Mineral Resources
Act 1989, I recommend that the mining lease be granted over the whole of the
application area for the purpose of mining for ZEOLITE and for the purpose of
STOCK PILE ORE/OVERBURDEN and TREATMENT PLANT/MILL SITE for a
term of TWENTY YEARS, subject to compensation being settled between the
parties or determined by this Court. (s.270(2)).
Dated at BRISBANE this 28 day of JANUARY 2000.
A.J. CHILCOTT
ACTING MINING WARDEN
©2000
70214MLA.EME 8
-- 4 of 4 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QMW/2000/023