Fazzari, Re [2000] QMW 21
IN THE MATTER OF:
BEFORE:
APPLICANT:
REPORT:
APPLICATION UNDERPART 7 OF THE WNERAL
RESOURCES ACT 1989 FOR A MINING LEASE
(NlThIBER 60306) IN THE QUILPIE DISTRJCT
MR A J CHILCOTT, ACTING WARDEN
FRANK FAZZARI
The applicant (hereinafter referred to as the miner or applicant miner) seeks a mining
lease under the provisions of Part 7 of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (hereinafter
referred to as the MRA or the Act) for the purpose of mining for OPAL and for the
purpose of associated infrastructure namely WORKSHOP/MACIDNERY/STORE. The
application is for a surface area of 13.5 hectares and is situated on LOT 447 on PH 895,
PH 10/447 County of WlNDULA, Parish of TUNA, being approximately 52 kilometres
west ofErornanga. Access is to be gained through the same area.
Power to grant such a lease is vested in the Governor-in-Council pursuant to section 234
of the Act after recommendation by the Minister. Save for the reservation in section 8(3),
all minerals are the property of the Crown. The grant of a lease does not create any estate
or interest in the land (s.10), although there is the power to determine title to land
(s.363(5)). The landowner bas no right of veto. The use of the land for the purposes
60306MLA.QUI 1
[2000] QMW 21
-- 1 of 3 --
Warden's Court of Queensland 25 January 2000
nominated is a pennitted use under s.319 of the MRA. Any mining tenure is not subject
to the provisions of the Integrated Planning Act, being exempt from the provisions of the
Local Government Planning and Environment Act 1990 by virtue of s.319 (Part 8) of the
MIU.
The application was lodged at the Mining Registrar's Office at QUILPIE on 18 October
1999. A certificate of application was issued on the same date (s.252 (1)) setting the last
date for receipt of objections as 15 November 1999 (s.252(2)).
No objections were lodged pursuant to s.260(1) of the Act. The following matters have
been taken into account and considered in making my recommendations. (s.269(4)).
(a) Have the provisions of the Act been complied with?
The material indicates that the Applicant is an eligible person as defined in section 5 of
the Act and is entitled to make the application under s.232 of the Act.
The application area is not located on or forming part of any reserve. I find that the
application is therefore not in respect of land over which, pursuant to s.238(1) of the
MRA, a mining lease shall not be granted without the consent of another person or
persons. There is no relevant permanent building or relevant feature on the land as
defmed in s.5 requiring the consent of any person (s.238(1)).
At the time of marking out and lodging the application, the applicant was the holder of
Prospecting Permit 60942 (s.232(1)).
A declaration of posting was lodged on 23 December 1999 (s.252(9)), and service of
documents was in accordance with s.399.
I am satisfied, on the material, including the uncontested information in the application
form and the declaration of posting and advertising that all the provisions of the Act
60306MLA.QUI 2
-- 2 of 3 --
Warden's Court of Queensland 25 January 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
Upon consideration of all the matters set forth in s.269(4) of the Act, I recommend
that the mining lease be granted over the whole of the application area for the
purpose of mining for OPAL and for the establishment of associated infrastructure
namely WORKSHOP/MACIDNERY/STORE for a term of TEN (10) YEARS
(s.270(2)), subject to compensation being settled between the parties or determined
by this Court.
Dated at BRISBANE this 25 day of January 2000.
AJ. CHILCOTT
ACTING MINING WARDEN
©2000
60306MLA.QUI 8
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QMW/2000/021