Covino v Power [1999] QSC 274
Z707~
State
-(' 11 (
'5(. ~tJ)z 74 -
. " .JUSTICE
Reporting Bureau
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made
or sold without the written authority of the Director, State Reporting Bureau.
, .. ~ -:-"'
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CIVIL JURISDICTION
HELMAN J
No 1855 of 1992
ANGELO COVINO
and
CATHERINE BRIDGETTE POWER
BRISBANE
.. DATE 30/07/99
JUDGMENT
/
1
REVISED COPIES ISSUED
State Reporting Bureau
DateoJJ / p-/
Plaintiff
Defendant
.1111 FlIHII', Tile Law COllrts, Gcor1!e Sireet. Brishane. O. 4()(}() Tl'h!IIII/,""~ {()7) .17.J7 dl('11 I~·.v· fli/\ 17.1/ ~C;1"
-- 1 of 2 --
300799 D.1 T11/IK29 M/T 5150/99 (Helman J)
HIS HONOUR: On the evidence before me it appears that the
plaintiff is entitled to damages for breach of contract in the
sum of $46,638.61. The contract in question is the agreement
alleged in the statement of claim and I accept the assessment
contained in Exhibit 1 subject to the deletion of $45,500.00
arising from the forced sale of Sydney land. Entitlement to 10
that sum has not been satisfactorily proved because there is
no appropriate valuation in the evidence.
I accept the calculation of interest which has been put before
me and I accept Mr Forde's submission that the deduction
referred to in the schedule of interest should not be made.
The evidence before me shows that the plaintiff is entitled to
the declaration sought and in the circumstances I think it
appropriate to make the order sought under section 114 of the
Land Title Act 1994.
So, the judgment of the Court will be as set out in the draft
that is before me and which I shall initial and have placed
with the papers.
2 JUDGMENT
20
30
40
50
60
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QSC/1999/274