Application for Forfeiture - Special Lease 1552956 - Murphy [1999] QLC 61 (1999) 20 QLCR 142
LAND COURT
BRISBANE
3 JUNE 1999
Re: Application for Forfeiture –
Section 238(1) Land Act 1994 –
Special Lease: 15/52956 –
Lessees: WJ and KM Murphy
(Hearing at Cunnamulla)
D E C I S I O N
Pursuant to s.238(1) of the Land Act 1994 (the Act), the Minister, on 30
December 1998, referred to the Court the matter of deciding whether Special Lease
15/52956 may be forfeited.
At the time of the reference, the Court was provided with a copy of a notice
dated 2 December 1998, addressed to the lessees, advising them of the Minister's
intention to refer the matter and the grounds on which the Minister considered the
lease may be forfeited. There has been therefore compliance with the requirements of
sub-ss.(2), (3) and (4) of s.238 of the Act.
The lease is for a term of 20 years which commenced on 1 January 1994, over
land described as Lot 11 CP 841119, Parish of Yowah, County of Wellington,
containing 1,320 m², situated in the Town of Yowah.
At the hearing of the matter on 19 May 1999, evidence was given by Mr MP
McCosker, registered valuer and Mr MW Coleman, operations manager – Land
Services, both employees of the Department of Natural Resources.
A report dealing with the considered non-compliance with a lease condition
was tendered. The lessees had purchased the lease on 18 October, 1995 and as a
requirement of the transfer, had executed Statutory Declarations to the effect that they
were aware of, and would comply with, the lease conditions. An inspection of the
lease was carried out by an officer of the Department on 13 June 1997 when it was
found that compliance with the Development Condition of the lease had not occurred.
Mr McCosker's evidence was that further inspections, one as late as the day before the
hearing, had confirmed that the only improvements on the lease comprised fencing
with an assessed value of $800.
The relevant Development Condition of the lease is as follows:
[1999] QLC 61
-- 1 of 2 --
2
"D1 The lessee shall within two (2) years from the commencement of
the term of the lease and to the satisfaction of the Minister
administering the Land Act 1962, effect structural improvements
on the leased land in accordance with plans and specifications
approved by the Paroo Shire Council of a value of not less than
$15,000.00; construction of such improvements shall be
commenced within one (1) year from the commencement of the
term of the lease and shall thereafter proceed at a rate of progress
satisfactory to the Minister administering the Land Act 1962."
Clearly, compliance with the Development Condition has not been met with
no explanation from the lessees, who did not appear at the hearing.
However, the Court was informed that on 3 May 1999 the lessees had sought
approval for the transfer of the lease to PJ and K Heywood.
Mr Coleman, as delegate for the Minister, had responded to that request by
letter dated 7 May 1999, advising "that the transfer as proposed will be allowed if in
order and lodged promptly" with approval conditions as advised. Mr Coleman did not
seek to have the Minister's reference to the Court withdrawn, but said that he would
not wish to act upon the decision if it was found that the lease may be forfeited, until
the transferees had been given sufficient time to accept the transfer conditions.
The decision of this Court is that the lease may be forfeited on the grounds of
non-compliance with Condition D1 of the lease.
It is recommended however that, in the circumstances, the lease not be
forfeited if the proposed transfer conditions contained in the letter to the lessees dated
7 May, 1999 referred to earlier, are promptly accepted by the transferees.
RE WENCK
MEMBER OF THE LAND COURT
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QLC/1999/061