Commissioner of Taxation v MacPherson [1998] QCA 256
[1998] QCA 256
COURT OF APPEAL
McMURDO P
THOMAS JA
MACKENZIE J
CA No 153 of 1998
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION BY KEVIN MARK THOMPSON
v.
GRAHAM JOHN MacPHERSON
(Applicant)
CA No 157 of 1998
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION BY LEIGHTON DAVID EVANS
v.
GRAHAM JOHN MacPHERSON
(Applicant)
BRISBANE
..DATE 04/08/98
JUDGMENT
1
-- 1 of 3 --
040898 T5/JB M/T COA181/98
2 JUDGMENT
THOMAS JA: This is an application for leave to appeal from
a decision in the appellate jurisdiction of the District
Court. We cannot say at this stage that the result, which
was a denial of costs to a successful defendant at the end
of a taxation prosecution in the Magistrates Court, was
plainly right.
In short, the ultimate correctness of the decision is
arguable and the preliminary question arises as to the
nature of the discretion that exists in the award of such
costs. The question arises whether the discretion is
limited to the short statement in section 8ZN of the
Taxation Administration Act or whether section 158A of the
Justices Act still operates in such cases. In other words,
the question arises whether enforcement proceedings brought
under part 3 of the Taxation Administration Act are covered
by section 158A of the Justices Act.
To decide that question, there appears to be a
constitutional issue involved under section 109 of the
Commonwealth Constitution. It is noted that the Attorneys-
General have been advised and that at this stage they do not
intend to intervene in these proceedings.
These circumstances are sufficient to justify a grant of
leave to appeal.
The order of the Court will be that leave is granted to
appeal against the order of Robin DCJ pursuant to notice of
-- 2 of 3 --
040898 T5/JB M/T COA181/98
3 JUDGMENT
appeal filed on 13 May 1998. It may be added that we do not
propose to limit the issues on the appeal as contended on
behalf of the Commissioner by Mr Jackson QC. The costs of
today should be costs in the cause.
THE PRESIDENT: The order of the Court is as stated by Mr
Justice Thomas.
-----
-- 3 of 3 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCA/1998/256