Dillon v Miles/Chinchilla Aboriginal Housing Company [1998] QIRC 216 (1998) 157 QGIG 90
90 QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL GAZETTE 29 May, 1998
##########################################################
QUEENSLAND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
Workpftu-e Ridmiom Au 1997
s. 218- applicativn for reins1 a1emcn1
Avcril Dillon
AND
Miles/Chinchilla Ahvriginal Housin g Company
/No. 8/.li<Jof/997)
COMMISSIONER BLOOMFIELD
15 May 1998
Reinstatement ·· Dismissal - Termination of Employment - Community
Deve.lopm<!nt Otfo.:cr - Su1111mu·y dismissal - Applirnnt dismi;.scd by newly
"ppoimcd Board members - RC,L'><.ms for termination nor known to Applicanr
until hearing - No previous concerns with Applicani"., perti,m1ance -
Arbitrated Mauer - No warnings given · · No oppo11unil)' to improve
performance - No op1xmunity 10 defend - Decision to 1erminatc Applicant';
;,crviccs was taken wilhoul regard to any industrial laws or requirements -
Dismi,sal was harsh. unjusl or unreasonable - Rcinsrnement unworkable -
Compcnsarion of $5.000 net awarded - Compensation to he paid in 4 equal
instalment, over 4 month,.
DECISION
Thb i, an application lodged by Queensland Servi,es. Industrial Union
of EmplO)'e<?, 1QSIU) which scd, the reinstarcmenc of Ms Avcril Dillon ro
her fom1er position of Community Development Officer with the
Miles/Chinchilla Abo11gin.tl Housing C,,mpan) tthe Company).
Jv1s Dillon hccamc the President of the Compan y at irs delayed 1995
Annual Gene ral Meetin g hekl in Fcl11\mry 1996. Shonly after her elccrion 10
thm position she stancd to perform the function, ,>f the Company·,
Community Development Officer following hi, resignation. She pe1fo11ned
thar role in an unpaid capadty until �O .lune I996 and �ontinued in thar role
a., a paid employee from I July 1996. Durin g her period a, an w1paid
employee rhe monies rhat would have otherwise 1->een available 10 pay her as
an employee were avaih.:d of by the then Board of the Company to clear
,werdue debls.
Following her fom1al appoimment to rhe rnle in " remporary capacity.
comrnen,ing I July I996, the posiriun wa, adveni,cd. She was confirmed as
the suc-ces,ful c·,mdidate in early Augusr 1996 following the considerarion of
al l applicarions by a Commircee whil:h included an impartial ourside
represenrative. An unsuccessful candidate for the position was Ms Vivien
Wybenga who,e name I mention oornu�c it shall reawrc below.
29 May, 1998 QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL GAZETTE 91
Ms Dillon resigned from her position as Presidenr al the 1996 Annual
General Me,eting apparently held in e.arly December 1996. During her
renure as Lxith President and _ Communiry Development Offi,er $he had
excluded her!<elf from d1.scuss1ons which may have involved her role us
Communicy r.xvek1pmen1 Officer because ()f her pecuniary interest.
In early February 1997 Ms Dillon wrote to the Minister for Aboriginal
and Torres Scrait blander Affairs and to the Chairperson of rhe Aboriginal
and Torres Strait blander Commission (ATSIC) raising concerns about the
financial conduct of the Company and alleged unaccounced expenditure of
0,-er $210.000 identified in previous audit Matcments.
Jn April 1997 Ms Dillon successfully applied to be allowed to occupy a
newly construl'ted house nwned by the Company. This house had been built
00 tlie site of a previou, house owne d by the Company which had burned to
rhe crouncl �orne time earlier. Apparently a dispuce arose within the local
com;nunity about rhe decision to grant tenancy 10 Ms Dillon instead of the
previous re,idenis on the basis thar 1hey had occupied_ the house w�ich
pre\'iously cxis1cd ,m that same site. After the personal mtervcnuon ol 1'v1r
Ray Robinson. Deputy Chairman of ATSIC. Ms Dillon agreed to va,ate the
ho�sc allhough she ha d already moved her per:,onal belongings into it.
M, Dillon apparently commenced le.gal action against the Company
seeking some restitution in relation to expenses incurred in moving into the
house and then having to vacate ir. Some allegacions were also made during
t)ie course of the hearing chat rhe decision of the Board 10 allow Ms Dillon to
(>ecupy the new house - allegedly in contlict wi1h ATSIC funding
requircmenr, - had resulted in the Company losing a grant of $220.000 for
the construction of additional houses.
Thi� mauer. and others. c.ausc<l srnne people in the local community to
,1uc>1ion tl1c ac1ivi1ie, of the l:loard of the Company a nd the decisions heing
rnken hy ir. There was apparently also ,ome disenchancment about Ms
Dillon hernu,e of the housing issue (above).
By lerter dated 27 May 1997 Ms Vivien Wybenga re.quested the
President of rhc Company to convene an Extrnordinary Mcering with rwemy
t>nc day,. l\,fartcr, proposed 10 he raised at rhaL meeting were set ouc in the
letter, which w11s also signed by rhe requisite five members of the Company
v.hich the constitution required for such me etings to be convened.
The rc..1uisi1ion wa, apparently not acted upon an d Ms Wybenga took it
upon herself. by lcucr dated I!$ June I997, to convene what was called an
F.w:iorJinar) Mcetin� in the office ofrhe Company at 6.00 p.m. on n .lune
1997.
Although copic, of this notice were apparently delivered to the existing
Board. a, well as Ms Dillon. only a Mr Hal.ard of the old Board ,mended.
At the Extraordinary �•leering held on 2J June the previous Board was
,ailed upon 11, resign and a new Commiuee was elected in its stead. Ms
W)bcnga bc<:ame the Secretary.
Following the elc.:ti,,n of rhe new Commirtcc the meeting <:onsidered a
numllt'r of other matter,. In tht nore.s of the mee.ring taken by the newly
appninted Secretary. Ms Wybenga. the following is recorded:-
--1. Fire CDO.
I. Da,·id C. 2. ,\nthony T . Unanimous.
Not dning duty. pecuniary. disruption communiry
Company to cnun. Breach of confidence.
Wilful damage.
3. �,>ticc to inform of firing and repos,es, car.
:'Jo notice civcn.
I. Lync.11c �H. 2. Amhony T. U nanim\lus:·.
Ms Wybenga rnncedcd in cvidcm;e rhat rhe notes 11::lle\Cted a decision
tak�n t,, rcrn,inare M, Dil.lon · s .services for the reasons identified. She could
not_ remember details of the reasons. simply nvring 1hat they had been raised
by llld1vidual members and that she had recorded the hroad i$SUe misc<l and
nothing more.
A meeting or the new Board wa, apparcnrly held following the
Exrraordinary Meeting ln,:luded in the fomial minures of this meeting are
the following irem,:-
"(J) Lener to Averil Dillon and Board of Direcwr, to notify them
of new Boa rd', decbion. Moved by Amhony Turnbull seconded by
Mefo,sa Bligh. Carried Unanimously.
( 10) Industrial Relations Lo be contacted Re: Miss A. Dillon·s
position a., COO. Vivien Wybenga to action .
Moved hy Trevor L. Seconded by An thony T.
Carried Unanimously:·.
On 24 June 1997 M� Dillon, in the company of the previous Secretary.
a Ms Muir. travelled to Brisbane to meet the State Manager of ATSIC. The
purpose of this meeting, which had been arranged previously. was tn di,cuss
the continuing problems within the Company. including ongoing fricrion
because of familial connections.
Ms Dillon informed me that she was unaMe to gain acce,s to the
Company's premises on 25 June because the locks had been changed. She
notified Ms Muir that the locks had been changed and they agreed to drive to
�ee 10 the ATSIC Regional Manager at Roma taking all Company
documents with them for "safekeeping".
Ms Muir and Ms Dillon infonned me that they handed over tO Mr
Shi mm,. the ATSIC Regional Mana ger. al l Company documents which they
had in their possession including minu1e books. cheque books. rental deposit
books and the Company seal.
After explaining 10 Mr Shimms the. problems a� they s<1w them -
includin g the apparent sacking of tl1e old Bvard - Mr Shimms spoke to the
Company's bank ar Chinchilla and froze all of the Company's accou nts
excepr for several cheques which had heen drawn in favour of Ms Dillon for
wages and for annual leave which ,he wa, due to commen ce on I July 1997.
A cheque was also apparently dra wn for $I()() for e.xpenses a�sociated with
the trip to Brisbane on 24 June 1997.
Ms Dillon gave evidence that be.cause ,he was unable 10 gain ac<.:ess 10
the 01mpany's premises she e0ntinucd m pe,frnm her usual duties from
home between 26 June an(.) 30 June. She proceeded onto annual le ave on I
July 1997.
On or about 7 July I 997 a letter advising Ms Dillon of her 1crminati(1n
wa, delivered to her hnu,e. The le11er was in the following terms:-
--Dear Ms Dillon
You are hereby given notice rh:it your position as
Community Dcvelopmenc Officer has been cenninared u nder the
section 2(h) of the wnstirurion of Miles/Chinchilla Abori ginal
Housing I\> be affective. immediately.
Yours sincerely
Alexandra O,mbamgo (Presidenl)
Vivien Wybenga (Secre tary)
Sarccta Turnbull (Board of Directors)
4t.h July 1997".
Another lellcr was given to her at the same time requiring her co hand
over possession of any Company propc11y. including the Compan y car.
The QSIU subse<juently attcmpred 10 ascertain the reason, for M,
Dillon's tennination. wil11out success.
Ms Dilloo·s membership of the Company was subsequently tem1inated
by lcllcr dated 23 January 1998 on rhineen grounds a$ set out in that lcne r.
Until the handwriucn notes of the Extraordinary Meeting came co light
during the course of the hearing the QSIU. and Ms Dillon. had believed thar
her employment as Community Development Oftker was tcnninatcd on
those. or similar. thirteen grounds. However. as rJ1e note, of the
Extraordinary Meeting show. the grounds were much more Jimiced.
Conclusion
Prior co 23 June 1997 there was no suggestion that any member of the
Boru·d of Miles/Chinchilla Aboriginal Housing Comp any had any concerns
ahout M� Dillon ·s pcrfom1a nc.e as the Company's Community Development
Oflicer.
Indeed, a number of te.,timonial leuer, tabled a s exhibit 31 suggesred
that Ms Dillon had ca1Tied out the function� of the Community Development
-- 1 of 2 --
92 QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL GAZETTE 29 May, 1998
Oflker in a competent anti exemplary fashion during her time in that rok.
Funher, the audit rcpo,1 rrcpare<l !'or 1h.: Dc<.:cmbcr I 99t> Annual General
Meeting ,tatcd ·· . . . q/i,· r 1/Je 11e,r c ommit1ee ,ms appoi111ed in Fehmarr
/996, the recordkn,ping H·<1,, nfa xood .H<mclarcl. Prior 10 this rlu:re u·as
i•err liu/,, record kel;/1i11g mai111ai11edlpr<'.1e111ed .fi11· t111di1i11g f>lh<'r 1ho11
ch<'q1te hooks und depusi1 books:· M., Dillon w,t, the Prc,idem during thi,
ti me antl also ac1ed for the majority of the same time as the Community
Di:, clop1 11ent Olli t:�r in both a vol untary and a paid ha.sis.
Durin� 1he ,ourse of her e,·itkncc and ,uhmi"ion, Ms Wyhcnga. on
behalf of the Company. all<!tnp1ed l•l ju,tify th.e 1crminati<m or Ms Dill,m by
as,ening tha1 Ms Dillon hac.J foiled to currculy rernrtl rental re,:ei p1, anti that
,;he had duplicated a numl:><!r of rental receipt, which had lllildc it diflicuh 10
rc,oncik bankings and rental pay111cm,. However. apart from lim iu:d
reference 10 the duplicated rL't:Cipt, no other matl'rial wa, prc,cn1cd which
'-'OUld enable the Commission 10 make any findings whatso,:vcr on any of
the a:-..�nion� adv:.ttK'cd. In any event nont: of the material sought hl he
rdi"d upon hy Ms Wybenga on behalf of the Company wa,; known about
when 1hc dc,·ision wa, 1akcn on 23 June 1997 10 di,pen,e with M, Dillon·s
scrvic:.:, without notice.
Quite apart from that aspco.:l it is now widely acccp1c<l that heforc an
employee <.:an he ju,1il'iahly 1cnninatcd any allegL't.1 ddit:icncic, in their
pe1formancc must be drawn 10 their a11cn1in11 and an appropriate opponunit)
given to the employee lo impmw their pcrfonnancc. Nont' of that happ,:ncd
here.
In my vic.w. the decision 10 1crmina1c Ms Dill(,n·, scrvkc, wa, taken
without regard to any indu!:itrial law:-. or ri:qui1t.!mcnt� hy a group of people
who <:oul d not di,1111gubh the activi1ie.s of M, Dillon. in her rnle a, a
C()Jlllllunity Dt>velopmcni Ofliccr, from the Board of the Company rn1d from
her much earlier role as President of the Board. The criticism of M, Dillon
for occupying the hou�c uf1cr a <l�(;i:,.ion Oy the Boan.1 w grun1 h.,;r applit:Htion
for tenancy anu. thereby. supposedly resuhing m a ltN, of promised funding
from f\TSIC highlight, 1hi, 1x1i111.
Although taking the det:i,ion tn 1erminmc M, Dillon·, ,crviccs on 23
Jun.: 1997 the Ill"-' Board failed 10 a<.:t tn infrn-m her or her termination umil
on or .Lround 7 July I 997. Thal delay '"is �ought hJ be explained on a
numher or ground, i ncluding that appropriate advice had to he ,ought ah,iut
the rca:-.on� whidl �hould he given. It was -;.aid that the n;a.,on spell out in the
lellcr of termination was suggested to 1he President after she ,poke 10 !he
Dcp.u 1mcn1 nf Training and Industrial Relation, anti that a lcner <.:m1ltl not
be r1..:parcd and ,igned until Ms Wyh�n�a rc1umctl frnm llri�bane (where
,he ,wrkctlJ 10 Chinchilla. I han: not takrn 1he tlday into a,·t:nunl in makin;:
the uhima1,· d�c·ision that I have :ind I .shall simply oh,cn·e 1ha1 ii ""'
...:onsi.,1cn1 with the l3oar<f !-- f;.iilun: lo .\ho"v i111y nmsidera1ion. or t:ourh:::-.y.
whatsoever lo M, Dillon duii ng this whole ti me.
Section 220 of 1h,• Wod.1,lace Rel01io11, Ac1 HNi sets out the mailer,
\\ohi...:h 1hc (\l1 11mis�ion n1ust c,:om, kkr when tle--c.:icJinl_! v ... 'h1..·1h�r a Jbmi!-i�:11 \.Vas
har,,;,h, unjusl t.lr unrca:-.onahh::. After having con!-.id�rcd Cho:-.c matt('f',, I have
11:ad1etl the ,ondu,ion 1ha1 the 1ennina1ion of M, /\ v,eril Dillon hy lcucr
tlakd 4 July 1 997 w,i s harsh. unju,t or unreaso1mbk-.
In my ,·icv.. the employer faik-J 10 oh,ervc the fundamental
rL'ttuircme111, assodatcd with 1crmi11ation in that it faiktl to inform Ms
Dillon. until 1he hearing. of 1he reastms for her termi nation and failed 10
rrovidc her wi1h any oppn1111ni1y. what,oever. IO respond 10 any c"<>ncerns
which 1he new Board ma) haw ha<I al>ou1 her conduct. capa,il) or
pcrfrnrnance. Funher. even if Lhcrc were any "alid crnKcnh no warning wa,
l,!i,·cn 10 M;; Dillon :il>o ul ,ueh ,on<.:crn, and no orrommil) wa.s pmvidcd 10
her to cOJTC<,:l ;.u1y al kgcd <lcficicnde�.
On llehalr or the Company M, W�b<:nga plcalled ignornn,·e about the
nt·ed to follow apprnpri,11e pro,edurcs stuting that withi n Abori _,?inal
communi1ic� ..nol everyone i, an �xp?n on cn�rythi11g..
!\1' Wybcnga also indit:aled that the Comp,uiy would nnt be in a
iioarn: ial JX>sition w pay any L'{,mpcn,aliun lO �h. Dillon if the Company w;.l..,
rountl at fault in this ni,c.
Section 222 (•f thi;; Workp/(lc<' lfriatim1.1 Acl /9Y7 deals \\ith 1h
ft'llll'!di�!-> av\1il�1blc for ,onsi<lt..!ration by tht:: Commis:-.iun if the Cornnfr,sinn is
,atisfied that an employ<'r has unlawfully dismissed an employee.
In my l"icw. rdn,,tatemcnt would 1101 he an inappropria1� remedy. The
<!viUencl! �ugg�!'>t� lht.1l 1hen.' i:-. an ongoing an<l �erious dispute hclwccn the
appli,ant and a number of members of Ll1c Board and of the membership of
th� Company ant.I the thil1('Cn grounds dt�d in the letter of 23 JamHll) 1997
to ju,tify the termination or M, Dillon·, rncmber,hip or 1hc Companv
suggest, 1ha1 ,my order for reinstat<.:n1..:n1 would simply he unworkable.
A<.:t:ortlingly. the Commission 1um:, its mind to an order for thc payment
of <:OITI[)cnsation in acconl,mce wi1h ,. 222( I )(b). In urn,idering any such
order 1he Conuni,,ion i, bountl by ,ubsec1ion t4J "hich b in the following
1e11n:-.:--
--(4) The <:ommission mu,t not make an rn·dcr under subsection
( I J or (2) unlcs,. rnn sidcring all the ,:irrnm,tancc, of the maucr. it
is sati,lied 1he remctly ordered i, appropriate:·
Sub,c't:lion (8) of s. 222 provides:-
..(81 In thi, ,ct: tion -
"drcumstances·. for an appli(.'.ation alleging Lhe dbrni:-.:--al was
har,h. unjust or unrca,,mahlc. include, ..
ta) if raised by the employer - the viability of the employer's
undertaking. c:--1ablishincnt or scrvit'c if the order were
made: and
(b) th� length of the employec·s emrloyme111 with the
�mpl\>ycr. ·�.
Ahhough Ms Wybenga ha, matlc so111e a.,,c11ion, from the bar tabl e
about the operations or the Company and it, financial cap:icity I am not
satisfied that an award of .:umpensation would havc the cfft:l:t for which she
t:ontcnd,. In any cvcn1. I am satislic<l. in all of the c ircumsrnnces of thi,
rnaucr. tha1 the remedy 1ha1 I haw ultimately ordered b appropriate.
In my vkw. 1hc dcc:i,ion 10 tcnninme Ms Dilk> n\ scn ires was taken
without any rt:gard wht.11�<'•1.'!vcr for h�r fundarnemal rights a� an �mployec
and witht>ut any cnn,iderminn nr 1hc ohl i[!atiorb which rna) have been on the
Colllpan)'. The degree of h,11.,,hncss. unjustness anti unr.:a,onablencss
a,sociated with the 1.Crmim11in11 - pa11kularly in ,11<.: h a ,mall community -
dkt;itc th,11 an appropriate level nr <.:nrnpensa1ion be awarded to M, Dillon.
In all nr the circ·um,1ano.:es. afler full and appropriate consideration of
the st ated linanci,11 p,"i1ion or 1hc rmplnyer. anti :,rtcr havint-t considered s.
222( 41. I ha,,e 1-cad1,ed 1he condusi,m 1ha1 :m appropri a1c amount of
wmpen,ation Ill t hb t:asc is SS.000.00 net.
I n my siew. an ,1 p1)ropria1c time within \\'hid1 l\·1' Dillon coultl hare
lx=�n t:xpct.:tcd lt• lind 1\>a:,,on.ihJc ah1:rnatiY..; cmployn1ent would !wvc been
not k» 1han thincen week,. Al h,er weekly wage of approxim:uely $370.IKI
net. :md allowing for :-.iunc sn1all amou nt <1f co:-.ts a(;!'>Ot:it.itcd with attendafll'e
at the hc;,rin�. I ha,\: an-iv.:d .it 1hc amount of $5.(�J0.0O net. Hat! I not been
�otl:,..l.'i\)U� of the rinan..;ial pt)si1ion of the employ0r I may hav.: awarded a
.,lightly higher amount. in chc order of an addition:il four ,web. hut I beJie1e
Lhal 1hc amounl !--O c.lcL..:rmjn..:.·d i� \Ill appro priall! amoonl of comJ)l..!ns.aLion for
Ms Dillrn1. pankularly havini: regard to 1hc lln11 , placed upon me by vinuc
or,. 22l!4i.
h i, my Ot'Jcr 1hat th� amount so detcnnincd i, 10 be paid 10 Ms Dillon
i11 fou r �4ual instalmcm, of 5 1 .2:\0.00 fr<:e of t,,x to he paiJ 1111 I June. I
July. I August :md I Scp1cmbc·r 199�. respective I) .
The Commi:-.:-.ion J�t.l..!rminc,; an<l onk"r-i m.:�on.lingly.
A.L. BLOOMFIELD. C,,mmi"ioncr.
Mr I. Bud,ky. of 1hc Qu,-cnsl and Scrvi,·c,. lndu,triul L'nion of Employ�
for M, /\. Dillllll.
:\1, V. Wyt>cnga for Milcs/Chind1illa ;\l'iorig inul Hou,ing Co, npany.
29 May, 1998 QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL GAZETTE 93
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QIRC/1998/216