Dennis v Workers' Compensation Board of Queensland [1997] ICQ 21 (1997) 155 QGIG 322
QUEENSLAND INDUSTR!AL COt RT
\\'()RKERS' COlv1PE!~SATIOt<
Rrlotunc; Ac!
app·coJ from deci:-.;1on t)f indu.'striai
(No, C!O
Jt'STlCE JFRSEY, PRESiOENT
t6 May I
YUDGME:'iT
An indu:;,trlai J'v1agisrrme affirn"Jed th,~ f('Spondent BnnnJ's tlct·i:--.ion tn
the appdbnr':; cialm ft.1r comrN:;nsation The appellant appcah
tkcJ:;;ion ~o Corni
·rhc appeH~1m's injury J dcprc'>;~ivc iHne~s ro
t.1f a Di Ryth. his ::rnploymenr a
fnr an \\.-0(1!,vorth:-: .,e;ifood
The I\·1.-igist.wtc found that the 1rnury
dlnt>~s. wa~ sufif:'n;d "hecau~-.e :,f
zqznfo:;;t (him} Jn connectjon \·i,.ll.h
1The tenns of the
0-;1 the cv idcnce
the i o the recent arne.nd1ncnt
In !w;; judgmem, tht• ~Aagi;S!:rate rcfr!rs
contributed (1_) the dcvc!nprn.::nt cf the ,h>nn•cc•""' I-I,;_• expres.;;;cd reas.'.-,n~
\vhy ht: did, did noL accept p~:.nicultir ~1cc.;Jun1s those rnatrers. and to
tht·ir signifii..':Jf}L'.e He t;nndly milrnm,,,.,,1 a
~ufficiem in the. evidence, thm ;:ippr:1\ant '"folt thm he shotdd net be
any i.:hecking'': 1ha1 the ~i.ppeihm1_ ''die; rnkc critiu~rn foo wdr)
Althqugh ivt~ Ryrie,
5ubrrns:-.!cn, in reladon
incident:--:, on
appelinnr.' s
the vie\,\
:tnd h,;;-t~,1
h;;:
Loudt1ni t:hs:Jgreed
s:..1ppi.ii:rJ
~tppei1am and fvfr LoudanL within view
\Valdon
leachng C\·enttwlly 10 the tJf the appeHaw
Byrh, !he psyt:l-1ja1risr, dr~scribf:d
prav.:n\ and the ;\.ires.sing down hy his _\rarr,edinh· m,.n""''''
singk rnajor e.vent which wo.rscned bi-;
tirr1c'" ~!ls R;Tic submitted th~t that incident
the appellant •- it was.
the exception in
dismls~:ng
w.:1\ siu1ply i11~1pμhcJ.bJe.
in rdiaJ1cc on that
!n response, S,::ipsfnrd, V<'ho fr1r
evidence nf 1\th l .i,md~mi that he told
the supplier v.:h0 denied rcfroz;er; the prJ',\-TS
the appellanr rhat t.lr Loudani said: "There':; nothing
and you'll sell \vhat I put in here," foH1)v.'e<l by hi:;
porsuc-d the ~ton..' n,mrnger" s office.
()n th;.1.t
Com}k't1Su1irin Boa:·d
towards the ap~llD-nt.
apfKll.::rnt, notwithstanding the. appdlzt:1t'~
H \NG:Jid hav~ bt·-en
i\-f:J.gistr;ite, in hts judg1nent,
Dppruach ro
m-udent u1 a
ln !rnve accepted.
The appeal
ft.':'-icr"' ed.
Di
30 May, 1997] QUEENSLAND GOVER.i~MENT INDUSTRIAL GAZETTE 323
-- 1 of 1 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/ICQ/1997/021