Clift v Timms [1996] QCA 421
[1996] QCA 421
COURT OF APPEAL
PINCUS JA
DAVIES JA
MACKENZIE J
Appeal No 1095 of 1996
COLIN DUFF CLIFT Appellant (Defendant)
v
KELVIN RAY TIMMS Respondent (Plaintiff)
BRISBANE
DATE 18/10/96
PINCUS JA: In this matter an issue has arisen with respect to an affidavit sought to be read
by counsel for the appellant.
The affidavit relates to a matter which was dealt with by the Judge below at page 453 of the
record.
Having given judgment in favour of the plaintiff, His Honour was confronted by an application
for interest made by counsel for the successful plaintiff. There was some brief discussion about
that application and His Honour made an order for interest from writ to Judgment, without any
opposition.
The application is to adduce evidence in support of Ground of Appeal, Ground 3, which
challenges the award of interest as having been excessive.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
It is common ground that no attempt was made to do this below. Had there been an issue to be
raised with respect to the basis upon which the plaintiff's counsel asked for interest, it should
have been done there.
Counsel for the respondent has urged upon us the view that the affidavit sought to be read does
not comply with the usual test with respect to adducing fresh evidence, I agree with that
contention and I would, for myself, be inclined to refuse the application to adduce fresh evidence.
DAVIES JA: I agree.
MACKENZIE J: I agree.
PINCUS JA: The application is refused.
-- 2 of 2 --
Official source: https://www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCA/1996/421