Beutel v Vickers [1995] QSC 82

sc_ qs/ 03';). State Reporting Bureau TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS (Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made or sold without the written authority of the Director, State Reporting Bureau.) SUPREME COURT CIVIL JURISDICTION j AMBROSE J No ECC 996 of 1994 IRENE GLADYS BEUTEL and LEONARD JAMES VICKERS BRISBANE .. DATE 22 / 03/ 9 5 Applicant Respondent 4th Floor, The Law Courts, George Street, Brisbane, Q. 4000 Telephone: (07) 227 4360. Facsimile: (07) 227 5532 -- 1 of 2 -- 220395 T 3-4/AW M/T 4908/95 (Ambrose J) HIS HONOUR: Yes, well it seems to me, Mr Vickers, that as a matter of law, you do not have a caveatable interest. The legislation was altered in 1978, but unfortunately for you, it did not have retrospective effect and unless you can address some other argument, I must accede to this application and order that your caveat be removed. As a matter of the law, I must 10 rule that you do not have a caveatable interest. I also rule that, letters of administration be granted subject to 2o the formal requirements of the Registrar. I order that the respondent pay the costs of this application to be taxed. Order as per draft which I sign and place with the papers. 2 ORDER 30 40 50 60 -- 2 of 2 --